Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA 777 Engines  
User currently offlineBoeing767-300 From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 665 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 1 month 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2140 times:

Much has been written on the fact BA were the launch customer for 777 GE engined aircraft and the fact that they later took 777s with Rolls Royce Trents. This was because thay had cancelled a 744 order with RB211s and to forfill the contract with RR they took the last ones with the Trents.

So they now have a 777 fleet with mixed engines. They are probably the only 777 operators with more than one type of engine.

BA are traditionally a Rolls Royce customer. What made them go for the GE engine in the first place?

If there are subsequent 777 purchases will they be GE or RR powered?

Do BA have a preference and are there any advantages to either of performance/reliability etc? A would know better than anyone the merits of either.

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13386 posts, RR: 77
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 month 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2092 times:

I don't know where this story about the later 777's only getting Trents because BA cancelled some 747 options comes from.
More like BA were not happy with some aspects of the GE90, they thought that R/R were the better bet because back in 1998 R/R had a Trent that could solve the problem of restrictions on some 777 flights.
Of course GE would go on to further develop the GE90, but at the time R/R was the better option, and the P&W engine was also evaluated.
GE got the contract because they offered to take BA's newly modernised South Wales engine overhaul facility off BA's hands, which BA now regret, according to managers in BA Engineering just a few years later.
It hasn't saved BA money, quite the opposite, a lot of experienced staff left after GE took over.
It was a shock choice, and did R/R much damage in the short term, but they clawed their way back on 777 in time.

User currently offlineBoeing767-300 From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 665 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 month 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2070 times:

GDB Thanks for your reply. I have read several times on this post the cancelled 744/77 engines to RR to compensate theory on this board.

So I guess any subsequent 777 BAs will be trent powered.

User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13386 posts, RR: 77
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2053 times:

It would be likely that future 777's will have Trents, but not if BA eventually buy the new longer-ranged 777's, unless Boeing moves away from the GE exclusivity on these aircraft.

User currently offlinePW100 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2002, 2799 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2025 times:

How many RR 777s and GE 777s does BA have at the moment? Did BA get any additional GE ones after they swithced over to RR?

Should BA regret the switch to RR, since I believe that GE is the only one to offer 115k lbs for future 777 developments? Will this limit BA's choice of operations long haul ops [not withstanding their 744's...], since RR does not offer the large engine for the heavy 777s?


Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
User currently offlineAamd11 From UK - Wales, joined Nov 2001, 1063 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2009 times:

i believe its 30 GE and 16RR... not entirely sure on the GE engines... its aboud 29/30... but i know for fact its 16RR 777s...

User currently offlineRaggi From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 1007 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1980 times:

I remember reading that BA was contractually obliged to take six 777s with GEs after the switch to RR..


Stick & Rudder
User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1967 times:

The early GE90 powered B777 had some grinding/rubbing problems that resulted in metal-shavings in the fuel tank. BA did not like that very much. I think that played a big part in the switch back to RR.

User currently offlineAFa340-300E From France, joined May 1999, 2084 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1961 times:


In February 2001, Flight International outlined British Airways' interest in a Rolls-Royce-powered 777-300 (below the 319t scope close).

So, IMHO, if British Airways places a further order for 777-200ERs, this is likely to be for RR engines -- unless GE comes up with an appealing offer for its GE90-94B (which would be in line with BA's requirement for a more powerfull engine than the -92B).

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Hall

Best regards,
Alain Mengus
Air Transport Business

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA 777 Engines posted Thu Apr 25 2002 18:24:41 by Boeing767-300
Story Behind BA 777 Engines posted Mon Nov 19 2001 11:45:23 by 9V-SVE
BA 777 Engines posted Sat Jan 16 1999 02:26:25 by cv990
Why Did BA Change 777 Engines posted Wed May 2 2001 08:27:58 by Boeing764
BA 777 Back To SEA posted Mon Oct 30 2006 03:41:45 by Suprazachair
BA 777 & 747 At MCO On 10-23? posted Tue Oct 24 2006 07:56:33 by Swatpamike
BA 777 Seating posted Tue Sep 12 2006 20:24:29 by PSAHO88
BA 777 & VS A340 @ EWR Today posted Thu Aug 10 2006 17:28:48 by Rw774477
BA 777 At MAD? posted Wed Jun 21 2006 04:24:55 by GEEZ
BA 777 Rolls Royce Vs GE90 posted Fri Jun 16 2006 06:44:21 by DFW13L