Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Cargo Vs Passenger  
User currently offlineUprightnlocked From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 123 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1334 times:

This thought crossed my mind as I witness numerous Cargo arrivals at MIA the other day....

Which creates more revenue 1) a fully loaded cargo 757/767 at the going rate or 2) a fully loaded pax 757/767 at the average fare. Both for a transcon flight - say JFK to LAX. Assume a/c acquisition, leasing and maintenance costs are the same.



3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAtlamt From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 240 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1321 times:

Cargo always make more money pound for pound. And a cargo plane is configured to use all the available space.


Fwd to MCO and Placard
User currently offlineNZ767 From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 1620 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1318 times:

I would guess that the cargo flights do.
1. You don't have to feed cargo; livestock excepted.
2. Cargo doesn't demand PTVs.
3. It doesn't demand upgrades or accrue frequent flyer points.
4. The airline doesn't have to throw in a free stopover and accomodation along the way just to get its business.
5. Most cargo business represent long term contracts.
 Smile



User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25049 posts, RR: 46
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 1298 times:

Having dealt with airline flight costing and profitability analysis in the past let me give you some ideas.

For your particular example of JFK-LAX, a passenger flight clearly would make more as this trancon route has a large amount of high yield business traffic, as compared to the very low domestic cargo yields. (majority of US freight moves on trains and trucks).

However in the international arena the reverse is possible. A good example is for instance cargo traffic coming out of Asia eastbound headed for the US. A few years back when the world economy was much stronger, a full B747F operating out of Japan could generate revenue of about $400-500,000. While on the other hand a B747 passenger flight from Japan to the US would generate revenue of less than $325,000 even with the high amount of first and business class traffic.

With the wide imbalance of trade however many cargo routes are mostly one-way. Using the above example the same B747F headed westbound to Japan would be lucky to generate $150,000 in revenue.

From a cargo profitability point of view the key is to find and operate in markets that have high yields without major cargo flow imbalance, or ensure one generates enough of a high yield in one direction to ensure the round trip becomes profitable. (ie USA-Asia-USA)








From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Cargo Vs Passenger posted Tue Apr 30 2002 00:26:22 by Uprightnlocked
Cargo Pilots Unprofessional Vs. Passenger Pilots? posted Sat Oct 7 2006 02:21:04 by Jawed
Air Cargo,dedicated Carrier Vs Passenger Aircraft posted Tue Apr 4 2006 15:35:22 by Bravogolf
Cargo To Passenger Conversion. posted Thu Nov 9 2006 21:10:24 by Jlbmedia
Loading Cargo Vs Being On Time posted Mon Dec 12 2005 23:08:55 by VSLover
"Beware Of Bombs In Cargo Of Passenger Jets" posted Tue Jun 11 2002 11:06:45 by Toda,Reisinger
Question On Cargo To Passenger Conversions... posted Thu Oct 4 2001 00:58:00 by Boeing727
VS Flight Diverted With Sick Passenger posted Tue Oct 31 2006 09:13:47 by LuckyEddie
Beta Cargo (Brazil) 707 Passenger Flights? posted Wed Jun 21 2006 19:16:24 by IDAWA
C5B Galaxy Vs Airbus A380 Cargo posted Sat Jan 7 2006 02:14:37 by Airfoilsguy