Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A340-200 Vs -300 Range Question  
User currently offlineCF-CPI From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 1058 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2501 times:

I'm aware that in 1993 when the A340 was introduced, the -200 had a range advantage over the -300 simply by trading payload for distance. However, recently there's talk about an upgraded series 300, say the -300E or similar, that supercedes the original -200 in range. This all sounds reasonable, but is Airbus now offering a corresponding A340-200E , which in theory would be the ultimate in range for Airbus until the -500 is available? The Airbus website says the the -200 is still the 'long ranger' (8000 nm) vs. 7500 nm for the -300, but I'm confused as to what they're comparing.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2460 times:

You raise an interesting question: I think that Airbus is comparing the current longest range versions of the A342 and A343, and not the upcoming A343-Enhanced with improved engines and other detail changes. The mission of the A343-Enhanced is to update the A343 and offer improved performance to airlines that dont require the super long range A345 or larger A346. I have not heard if an enhanced version of the A342 will be developed, probably unlikely, as the airlines have always been far more interested in the A343 and niche that the A342 was to fill has largely been taken over by the A332 aircraft. Its been a while since Airbus has received an order for an A342 in any case, but if someone would want an A342 or even an enhanced version, I guess Airbus would build it.

User currently offlineTom_eddf From Germany, joined Apr 2000, 451 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2380 times:

The 8000nm A340 is the -213X, powered by the 34k-lbs engines, also known as the A340-8000. But only very few (if any?) have been sold so far.

The 7500nm aircraft is the -313X, powered by the same engines.


User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 33
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2378 times:


The A340-213X aka A340-8000 which was sold to the Sultan of Brunei is the only one ever produced. Initially the A340-8000 was referred to as "A340-200HGW".
Two further -213 (without X) went to the Saudi Arabian VIP flight. (What´s the difference between the X and the non-X version?)

iirc the -8000 gains her superior by sacrificing some cargo space for additional fule tanks. For that reason the wing structure is slightly enforced where it´s joined to the hull (again, iirc).

Daniel Smile



User currently offlineTom_eddf From Germany, joined Apr 2000, 451 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2362 times:

Daniel, afaik the difference between the "X" and "non-X" version is the higher MTOW of 275t.

Cheers,
TOm.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A340-200 Vs. A340-300 posted Tue Jun 20 2000 12:18:42 by Ben88
Airbus A340-200 Or 300? posted Wed Oct 19 2005 06:40:16 by Captaink
A340-300E Vs -300 Enhanced posted Fri Feb 13 2004 17:53:04 by MaverickM11
A340-200 Ultra Long Range posted Tue Jan 20 2004 13:59:25 by Ryder10uk
QF A330-300 Range Question posted Thu Dec 18 2003 05:17:31 by QANTASpower
777-300 Range Question posted Mon Jun 23 2003 14:46:43 by JAL
A330-200 Vs. -300 posted Wed Jul 24 2002 18:13:00 by Cactuscmh
Help! Is It A A340-200 Or -300? posted Wed Oct 10 2001 16:22:46 by Pilatus
767-200 & 300, Vs 767-400 Cockpit Communality. posted Thu Nov 2 2006 05:49:34 by Jlbmedia
Airbus 330-200 VS A330-300 posted Mon Jun 5 2006 21:11:02 by YULYMX