Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Branson To Spend $100 Mil On US Low Cost Airline  
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13745 posts, RR: 19
Posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4452 times:

Richard Branson, plans to start a US no frills airline with $100 million.

The airline, Virgin Red (hmmm), will start if US and €uropean revive open skies talks succesfully to allow foreign groups to control American airlines.

Branson also said that he does not plan to derail EZY's £400 million bid for Go.

Virgin Red is hoping to have a base on the north-east coast of the US, operating 10 planes, expanding to four hubs and 40 planes later.

More information at The Herald website


Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4281 times:

You have a big interest in Virgin these days, I wonder why  Big grin

User currently offlineHawkeye2 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4243 times:

Assuming the foreign-ownership rules are relaxed in the first place, Branson should just buy a stake in JetBlue and be done with it. B9 is the closest US equivalent to a low-cost airline with a hip "Virgin-like" flavor.

User currently offlineAirNewZealand From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 2542 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4236 times:

LOL Hkgspotter,

Anyways, he expanding all over the world isnt he!! Man i wonder where he will go next?? Middle East?

Mike


User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13745 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4223 times:

HKGSpotter: You have a habit of trying to spoil my posts. I wonder why.

The article indicates that Branson wants to expand into the markets of Japan and South Africa. China would also be a good place for him since it's going to grow the biggest in the near - medium term future.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4198 times:

This is hardly news. It's been known for ages that Dickie would set up a US airline if the ownership rules changed.

Any chance of something more up-to-date?


User currently offlineSAS23 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4166 times:

Considering that he's currently limited to just 24.9% ownership, I really doubt that this story is true - of course, there is nothing stopping him entering into a franchise deal with a US carrier! Big grin

User currently offlineN863DA From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 48 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4111 times:

LOL!!! Y'all make me laugh.

Call up JetBlue HQ and ask why all the guys are British.... got any ideas? Because in everything but name, JetBlue is Virgin America.

(JetBlue = Virgin Blue, America).

Obviously with current rules nothing can be written down in stone, but there is no doubt that they will write it down as soon as the rules lax up (which they should not do).



User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4575 posts, RR: 41
Reply 8, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4103 times:

Hawkeye2 - funnily enough, I was going to suggest the same. They could even rename it, wait for it, Virgin Blue USA... Seriously, a Virgin JetBlue partnership seems like a great idea in my opinion - Lets hope good old Sir Richard doesnt show the world's media an cheque to buy JetBlue, then tear it up saying its a joke...

AirNewZealand - Japan I believe is the next place he wants to set one up, according to an article I was reading the other day.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 22
Reply 9, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4076 times:

Not likely it will happen. The U.S. hasn't been very willing to change the foreign ownership rules.


"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlineTNboy From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 1131 posts, RR: 19
Reply 10, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4063 times:

Branson grandstanding again. Oh well, Singapore_Air, makes a change from your SQ press releases. Whose money does Dicky plan to spend, and who will he eventually sell to, and to subsidise what new "venture".
Everything changes, yet everything remains the same.
Cheers
Bill



"...every aircraft is subtly different.."
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4514 posts, RR: 34
Reply 11, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3985 times:

Foreign ownership rules should be relaxed in the US, just like most industries in the US have free trade and real competition. The US high-cost network-airline Cartel needs all the well-managed low-fare competition it can get. Consumers deserve no less.

The most likely scenario for allowing foreign-owned domestic US carriers would be if the Cartel carriers tried to consolidate again. I've argued at this forum for a long time that superconsolidation among the US network carriers--from 6 down to 3--would be disastrous for consumers....unless, Uncle Richard et. al. were allowed to come in and offer competition.

Southwest and other US low-fare carriers are very well managed, but the concentrated market power of the high-cost cartel in 3 supercarriers is NOT a risk the Justice Department will allow. That is why the pro-business current US administration killed UA-US last year. Then Sept. 11 happened, and nobody wants to consolidate....right now.

But the whining continues. Leo Mullin of Delta has been whining for years about how the Cartel 6 barracudas must be allowed to consolidate for alleged "economic reasons." It's possible that the Cartel "Six Families" Dons and Congress could work out a deal where they are allowed to consolidate, and Uncle Richard and WestJet, et. al., are allowed to come in and offer an even broader base of competition. US Superconsolidation should *not* be allowed otherwise.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3976 times:

You got to admire Sir Richard, when his name hasn't been in the papers for a few days, he says something to get it back in. Yes, it is no secret that he wants an American airline in order to have an airline of his own to transfer VAA pax onto. Virgin was at one time rumored to be buying a stake in a U.S. carrier. The U.S. gov't may have to change their policies concerning foreign ownership of airlines in order to get an open skies agreement going again with the UK. $100 million can definitely get an airline started, but he would be better off buying an exsisting carrier and using some of that money to expand it. The U.S. is saturated with low-fare carriers, so buying several of the smaller ones and consolidating them may be the best bet for Branson if he is given the chance.

User currently offlineAA717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3896 times:

AA/BA is allowed to go. Richard will withdraw his objection about the LHR slots. Foreign ownership rules are changed in the U.S.... With the proper amount of money, anything is possible.TC


FL450, M.85
User currently offline767ALLTHEWAY From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 659 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3884 times:

You say he wants to start operating with A base in the northeast, do we have any indication of to which airport he would want to base Virgin Red out of?


"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that something else is more important than fear"
User currently offlineNonrevman From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1302 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3886 times:

Shoot,

I was hoping that this thread was about Branson, Missouri trying to get a low fare carrier into Branson or maybe Springfield.  Sad

I now return you to your thread.


User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 16, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3865 times:

How would a low fare US carrier help a transatlantic,high fares airline in feed?

User currently offlineMcdougald From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3858 times:

You can bet the major carriers will be lobbying ferociously against allowing foreign-owned competitors into the market. The odds would be in their favour, since each major carrier carries a fair bit of clout in any state in which it has a hub -- i.e., all the large states and a few medium-sized ones.

That said, liberalising the world's foreign ownership laws would be a good thing. Especially for smaller countries, where foreign ownership restrictions limit struggling carriers' and start-ups' options when seeking investors.

Branson could explore the possibility of franchising out to local owners/operators if he wanted to, but even that faces potential problems. Greyhound Air (originally owned by Phoenix-based Dial Corp.) tried to get around Canada's foreign ownership rules by hiring B.C.-based Kelowna Flightcraft to do the flying while they looked after the marketing and scheduling, but were stopped anyway. Branson could face a similar situation in the U.S. and other countries if he went that route.


User currently offlineRyanair From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 654 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3805 times:

So Richard Branson come up with a headline grabbing idea that is actually impossible because of a minor thing called the law. Gee that's never happened before!!!!!!

Back on earth, what's said about Jetblue is very true. Jetblue poached ruthlessly from Virgin Atlantic taking much of that companies best and brightest management.

It's been sad to see VS go down hill ever since, I never thought I'd see the day where former Virginites talked of BA being better. I know my employers corporate account with VS is up for grabs again because they've p"£$ed us around once too often. Rather than rattle on about pipe dreams, come on Richard get what is back to their once proud best!!!!


User currently offlineCiro From Brazil, joined Aug 1999, 662 posts, RR: 6
Reply 19, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3789 times:

A Virgin in Red! Cool name!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


The fastest way to become a millionaire in the airline business is to start as a billionaire.
User currently offlineBa777-236 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 674 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3736 times:

I thought Mr Branson wanted to start an airline in Canada?
He had said in an interview on a local TV station about a year ago - that he was interested in starting up an airline if Canada changed their foreign ownership law. Have they changed this law?



I like British Airways! I'm not sure why, but I do! ;-)
User currently offlineMcdougald From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3696 times:

BA777-236 wrote: "I thought Mr Branson wanted to start an airline in Canada?"

He expressed interest in it. Transport minister David Collenette, however, has repeatedly said he has no intention of permitting foreign ownership of Canadian carriers.

There has been talk of raising the foreign ownership limit to 49%, but whether Branson would be interested in anything less than majority control is another question.

This exposes a double standard: Both Collenette and his U.S. counterparts are fine with foreign ownership in the railways. Canadian National was allowed to buy the Illinois Central Railroad, sell one of its domestic lines to a Denver-based company and then seek a merger with BNSF which would have produced North American Railways, the world's largest, had anti-trust regulators not objected.

But with the airlines, it's a totally different story. Go figure.


User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 22, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3690 times:

I suspect Mr Branson has said in an interview that he wants to rule the world too.

User currently offlineFrequentflier From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 422 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3656 times:

Let's get it on!

Go Blue!


User currently offlineTonyBurr From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1038 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3656 times:

China would be a very intersting place for Branson to start an airline!!! yes there are lots of Chinese airlines, but he would bring an expertise that is missing.

An American line would certainly feed into Virgin's international gateways. If it is possible it makes sense.

It sould be great to have some competition for USAirways in the northeast.


25 Tullamarine : Jet Blue current has a market capitalisation of USD2.3Bn so you'd have to think that USD100M isn't going to buy Branson much of an existing carrier. S
26 Wilcharl : N863DA what you said about Virgin and JetBlue sounds like it came from an Embry Riddle Airline Managment Professor...
27 N863DA : LOL Indeed it did. Does it show?? I turned around and called them because I was inquisitive. What do you know... he was right. LOL.
28 Wilcharl : i didnt beleive him, so they really are brits... wow
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Potential For New Low-cost Airline On Intra-Italy posted Mon Jan 31 2005 19:53:24 by Pe@rson
Taca To Start Low Cost Airline In Mexico? posted Tue Dec 14 2004 19:04:18 by MAC1
All Nippon Airways To Launch Low Cost Airline posted Mon Jun 7 2004 11:27:19 by Singapore_Air
Thomson To Launch Low Cost Airline From Coventry. posted Thu Dec 18 2003 00:48:04 by Gilesdavies
Branson Planning Asian Low Cost Airline posted Wed Dec 10 2003 09:02:24 by Singapore_Air
New Low-cost Airline For Britain (LTN To Be Exact! posted Tue Mar 11 2003 13:09:01 by David_itl
Is CX Going To Establish A Low Cost Airline? posted Wed Apr 17 2002 15:53:55 by Fear_of_fly
Austrian Airlines To Start A Low-Cost Airline posted Sun Feb 17 2002 23:34:12 by Singapore_Air
LH To Launch Low Cost Airline posted Tue Feb 5 2002 10:02:43 by Lhuaaua
AC's Low-cost Airline To Be Based In YVR posted Wed Aug 15 2001 19:00:44 by Jiml1126