Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Crichton's "Airframe"-based On Real Life Incident?  
User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1966 times:

Hey folks,

I was browsing the NTSB's database of incident reports when I came across this one (sorry for the all caps, thats how it came):

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20001211X12107&key=1

NTSB Identification: DCA93MA037 . The docket is stored on NTSB microfiche number 48295.

Scheduled 14 CFRPart 129 operation of Foreign CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES
Accident occurred Tuesday, April 06, 1993 at SHEMYA, AK
Aircraft:MCDONNELL DOUGLAS MD-11, registration: B2171

Injuries: 2 Fatal, 60 Serious, 96 Minor, 97 Uninjured.
FLIGHT 583 WAS LEVEL AT 33,000 FEET WHEN THE LEADING EDGE SLATS DEPLOYED INADVERTENTLY. THE AUTOPILOT DISCONNECTED AND THE CAPTAIN WAS MANUALLY CONTROLLING THE AIRPLANE WHEN IT PROGRESSED THROUGH SEVERAL VIOLENT PITCH OSCILLATIONS AND LOST 5,000 FEET. THE SAFETY BOARD DETERMINED THAT THE INADVERTENT DEPLOYMENT OF THE SLATS WAS THE RESULT OD AN INADEQUATELY DESIGNED FLAP/SLAT HANDLE THAT ALLOWED THE HANDLED TO BE EASILY AND INADVERTENLY DISLODGED FROM THE UP/RET POSITION, THEREBY CAUSING SLAT EXTENSION.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident/incident as follows.

THE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD DETERMINES THAT THE PROBABLE CAUSE OF THIS ACCIDENT WAS THE INADEQUATE DESIGN OF THE FLAP/SLAT ACTUATION HANDLE BY THE DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY THAT ALLOWED THE HANDLE TO BE EASILY AND INADVERTENTLY DISLODGED FROM THE UP/RET POSITION, THEREBY CAUSING EXTENSION OF THE LEADING EDGE SLATS DURING CRUISE FLIGHT. THE CAPTAIN'S ATTEMPT TO RECOVER FROM THE SLAT EXTENSION, GIVEN THE REDUCED LONGITUDINAL STABILITY AND THE ASSOCIATED LIGHT CONTROL FORCE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MD-11 IN CRUISE FLIGHT, LED TO SEVERAL VIOLENT PITCH OSCILLATIONS. CONTRIBUTING TO THE VIOLENCE OF THE PITCH OSCILLATIONS WAS THE LACK OF SPECIFIC MD-11 PILOT TRAINING IN RECOVERY FROM HIGH ALTITUDE UPSETS, AND THE INFLUENCE OF THE STALL WARNING SYSTEM ON THE CAPTAIN'S CONTROL RESPONSES. CONTRIBUTING TO THE SEVERITY OF THE INJURIES WAS THE LACK OF SEAT RESTRAINT USAGE BY THE OCCUPANTS.

For those who dont wanna read it I'll sum up the similarities that I see here (some more detailed than others):

-China/Hong Kong widebody jet involved
-Inadvertent slat deployment
-poorly designed handle
-pitch oscillations
-over the Pacific Ocean
-similar casualty figures (in Airframe, 3 dead and 56 injured)
-similar but not entirely identical probable cause...
-similar flight numbers (TPA 545 in Airframe)
-aircraft involved had a reputation for problems

What do you think?

Greg


Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTNboy From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 1131 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

I've just started reading it. The cover notes say it contains Crichton's hallmark "scientific research", so maybe the research was partly based around this particular incident?
Cheers
Bill



"...every aircraft is subtly different.."
User currently offlineChe From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 537 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1912 times:

It could be based on that event. I just read it not too long ago and it is an excelllent book!!! It kept my attenticion the entire way through.

che


User currently offlineFrequentflier From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 422 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1909 times:

Interesting...

What a great book, by the way.

Never take it on a trip, though!  Smile


User currently offlineSquigee From Canada, joined May 2001, 652 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1889 times:

Its so funny that I just finished reading the book, and I keep noticing people mentioning it. It must be that I finally notice all the references which I missed before. If you haven't read it yet - DO! It's a really good read, and you learn a lot too.

BTW- MD-11 and N-22, coincidence? I think not  Big grin



Someday, we'll look back at this, laugh nervously, and then change the subject.
User currently offlineJonathan L From United States of America, joined May 2001, 171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1847 times:

I've read it twice, and now I wish they'd make a movie out of it already...

User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16370 posts, RR: 56
Reply 6, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1825 times:

The parallels with MDD are very evident.

I enjoy his novels from an aviation standpoint. Some of the non-av drama & personal plots are a little corny.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineSccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5617 posts, RR: 28
Reply 7, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1800 times:

Ah, but the ultimate culprit is not the aircraft, and the unusual circumstances applicable there are taken from life, in Rusia.... no more hints, for those who've not yet read it.


...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1780 times:

Heheh sccutler,

I see what you mean now I remember reading about the Russian similar incident as well...although circumstances were a bit different between the two.

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineBNE From Australia, joined Mar 2000, 3189 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1765 times:

Greg thanks for finding that incident report. I thought the accident was caused in a simlar way to the Russian accident but you have now given me the other part of the story. I might have to go re-read the book as I read it a few years ago before I realy knew as much as I do now about aircraft.

I found the book rather easy to read and amazon is showing the book as available for $7.99.



Why fly non stop when you can connect
User currently offlineJayhup From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 452 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1755 times:

For those of you who haven't read the book and don't want to know what happens stop reading now........

I though the point of the book was that it was human error and not a mechanical one that caused the accident. Although it has been a long time since I read the book and I've read a hundred books since then so I may have confused it with a John Grisham or Patricia Cornwell novel......

JH


User currently offlineUALPHLCS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1749 times:

I have read the book as well, you have the point of the novel down correctly Jayhup.

I also agree w/ the subplots about media bias and laziness,(read my post in the Media bias thread) and the EU politics. Both seem pretty true to life.


User currently offlineLZ-TLT From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 431 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (12 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1710 times:

Another paralel(sp?):

In the book, the Norton Aircraft manufacturing facility was located in Burbank.

The book is good either. I believe, however, Crichton took one accident to "shape" the book around, but there have been several other incidents he has studied in order to get the final result. One I recall was an Inex Adria DC-9 crashing on approach to Ajaccio-Campo Dell'Oro . As various sources cite, evidently the son of the captain was in the cockpit and his voice clearly identified on the CVR. Here and there, this is considered a contributing factor leading to the crash. Here is a brief description of the accident:

http://aviation-safety.net/database/1981/811201-1.htm


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
No More "beverage Only" In FC On Northwest posted Wed Sep 6 2006 22:59:02 by Burnsie28
"Het KLM Hek Clipper" At SXM On Video posted Sun Aug 6 2006 16:33:45 by JHSfan
AS "Special Livery" In PDX On Fri 7/14? posted Fri Jul 14 2006 06:20:29 by Polar1
"Researchers Working On Alternative Jet Fuel"! posted Tue Jun 20 2006 06:41:22 by NWDC10
"Go" Ferry Flt On Way To HNL posted Fri May 19 2006 19:28:32 by TropicBird
UA To Air "Today's Military" Short Film On IFE posted Sat May 6 2006 19:43:17 by 777fan
Air Canada: Pax "ecstatic" About IFE On Embraers posted Fri Apr 14 2006 17:31:53 by PlaneHunter
"A" Boarding Passes On WN, For A Fee.. posted Mon Nov 28 2005 18:39:22 by Type-Rated
"GOL, Took On Varig/TAM. Mexicana/AeroMexico Next" posted Sat Sep 10 2005 06:35:08 by Juventus
CNN: "Travel Risky On Peru's Airlines" posted Wed Aug 31 2005 21:10:08 by LH459