Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Mid Sized Jet For Boeing?  
User currently offlineMls515 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3076 posts, RR: 9
Posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1895 times:

Friday May 10, 6:19 pm Eastern Time
Reuters Company News
Boeing considering new mid-sized jet - sources

By Chris Stetkiewicz and Bradley Perrett

SEATTLE/LONDON, May 10 (Reuters) - Boeing Co. (NYSE:BA - News) is considering building a new, more efficient airliner to replace its slow-selling 757 and 767 models in what would be its first all-new program in a decade, people familiar with the plans said.
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/020510/transport_boeing_1.html






Interesting. A tricky spot Boeing is in.

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11151 posts, RR: 59
Reply 1, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1798 times:

I say update the 757 and 767.


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineSquigee From Canada, joined May 2001, 652 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1783 times:

I think this is also an opportunity for the Boeing engineers to flex their designing muscle. Many had left the company because they felt they were only doing redesigns of existing models, while other companies were doing new designs.


Someday, we'll look back at this, laugh nervously, and then change the subject.
User currently offlinePmk From United States of America, joined May 1999, 664 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1778 times:

Why is a Boeing news report originating from Washington State?

User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 4, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1770 times:

Thanks for posting, you beat me to it!

We spoke about this topic a few days ago here......it is time for Boeing to look at replacing the 757/767, or offer next-generation models of each in my opinion. This is a hugely important market for Boeing, as Airbus does have a void in its line-up in the 200/250 seat category at the moment (A300 is old-tech, and there is a major gap between the A321-200 and A330-200) and Boeing cannot afford to let this market slip away.

The 757/767 has been a huge success, but the 764's lack of popularity when compared to the A332 is a sign that something new and improved is needed.


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 7929 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1748 times:

I wouldn't be surprised that a replacement for the 757/767 line has begun engineering studies.

Imagine a reduced size 777 and that might be the plane we're talking about. It might essentially be a plane that uses the current 767 fuselage but with a new nose, new tail assembly, and lower-drag wings so the plane can cruise faster (at least the same as the 777 on long-range cruise) and fly further.

Given the large number of 767's in service I don't think there's pressing need for Boeing to include side-by-side LD3 container compatibility.


User currently offlineFlyboyOz From Australia, joined Nov 2000, 1974 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1693 times:

Does it looks like a new small sized fuselage of a "Boeing 777"?


The Spirit of AustraliAN - Longreach
User currently offlineTransSwede From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 993 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1661 times:

Perhaps this is the Sonic Cruiser backup program...  Smile

But seriously, I agree with others that a 757/767NG is needed for Boeing to stay competitive, and it is an excellent oppertunity to fill the void in the 200-pax segment of the airliner market.

BTW, if they go for side by side LD3, they will have to basically size it just like an airbus 300/310. It would probably be better to just update and revise the 767 cross section.


User currently offlineBruno From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 853 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1612 times:

Any chances of a rear engine T-tail jet?



I support the women’s movement up and down!
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 7929 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

Bruno, not likely.

Mostly because of center-of-gravity and T-tail aerodynamic issues for such a big plane with your suggested design.

My suggestion of using the 767 fuselage with new nose, new tail and new wings with new engines is probably what I think Boeing is working on. Given all those changes I wouldn't be surprised it'll be called the 787 when it's finally revealed.


User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6199 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1560 times:

sounds like the 737-800, -900.


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1479 times:

RayChuang..how would a new nose help the 767? Apparently it was good enough to use on the 777!

User currently offlineVoodoo From Niue, joined Mar 2001, 2053 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1463 times:

Its called the Pinnochio nose.
Every time Boeing announces a new plane
the nose gets longer and longer.



` Yeaah! Baade 152! Trabi of the Sky! '
User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4856 posts, RR: 20
Reply 13, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1457 times:

LOL  Smile nice one, voodoo!

Seriously, that's the end for the Sonic Cruiser for sure. "No market demand, economy downturn" or anything like that will be their excuse


User currently offlineAerosol From Germany, joined Oct 2000, 552 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1434 times:

From a strategic point of view, boeing's civil aircraft division's policy of announcing and dumping aircraft is a catastrophy. Can anybody name the aircraft they announced in th last two years?

User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5476 posts, RR: 15
Reply 15, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1406 times:

Isn't this what the proposed 777-100 was supposed to be like, but only longer range?

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineAmmunition From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2002, 1064 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1395 times:

Im sure airbus is fully aware of the massive gap between the A321 and the A330, and they too must be thinking hard and worrying what to do, thay have a lot of projects on teh go and maybe they dont have the resources at the moment, but im sure they wont let boeing get 1 over them in this market. The demand is massive, the A300/A310/762 were very popular, and a replacemenet from both manufacturers could be likely, i think.


Saint Augustine- 'The world is a book and those who do not travel, read only 1 page'
User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7737 posts, RR: 16
Reply 17, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1396 times:

I think we can all agree that Boeing needs to be far more aggresive in its new product development. While the originals are pretty good, you can get only so far with derivatives.

I wonder if Boeing would still offer its medium-sized jet with two fuselage cross-sections. A new wider narrow-body and a revised smaller wide-body. I am not sure if they could successfully make a widebody replacement for the 757.



Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineSjc>sfo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1389 times:

I guess I'd probably agree here. Frankly, after doing alot of SFO/SJC-JFK trips, I've found the 767 to be a spectacular airplane for the passeneger, even in cattle class. The versatility of the plane is awesome too, it can fly long distances, have a 2-class set up, or a 3-class set up. Its a good plane for reaching smaller cities in Europe from the US, and if traffic increases like some people say it will, it may be very useful for more medium range routes like ORD-MIA etc.

User currently offlineYyzcabincrew From United Arab Emirates, joined Apr 2002, 101 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1374 times:

Airbus is aware of the gap between the A321 and the A330-200 thats why they came up with the model called the A330-100 it was to replace the ageing fleet of A310's. I believe the plan was scrapped, then again this was before 9/11. who knows it might be in talks again.

User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 20, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1349 times:

Lots of possibilities, and I am sure that Boeing is exploring each one of them.

I think that Boeing is talking about a totally new airliner here, of course using a part or two from the existing lineup, for the 200/250 seat market. A 777-100 would be too big and heavy to replace the 767 line, although one could say that a 777-100 may have been a better alternative than the 767-400, but that is in the past.

I am betting that the new airliner will be a wide-body, 8 abreast for coach with side-by-side capacity for LD3s in its belly, so that limitation of the 767 series can be put to rest. Likely in 2 lengths, one in the 225 seat category and one in the 275 seat category (smaller is really not necessary, the 739 can take over many missions from the 757), each with 2 range options: medium (3,500 miles - 757 range) and long (6,500 miles - 767ER range);maybe an ultra long-range version(8,000 nm) will follow depending on the Sonic Cruiser.



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing: Mid-sized Jet To Dominate China's Market posted Wed Mar 12 2003 14:03:37 by Carnoc
Busy Takeoff For Boeing's New Commercial Chief posted Sat Dec 16 2006 23:08:00 by Leelaw
Jet To Exercise Options For Boeing, Airbus Planes posted Mon May 1 2006 08:56:24 by 777ER
Forever New Upcoming Orders For Boeing! posted Fri Jul 16 2004 04:08:03 by BoeingBus
New Order For Boeing? posted Thu Jul 3 2003 23:47:06 by Qb001
Airlines Ask For A New 250 Seat Jet. posted Sun Feb 18 2001 22:20:02 by P&M
Gecas Finalizes 76 Jet Order For Boeing Aircraft. posted Sat Sep 30 2000 23:06:34 by CX747
New Orders For Boeing posted Sat Sep 30 2000 00:23:56 by Wingman
New Delta Scheme: Habitat For Humanity posted Fri Nov 10 2006 03:22:59 by BigPhilNYC
Big Week For Boeing posted Fri Nov 10 2006 03:19:07 by CO738