Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
6th Runway In DEN To Open In Fall 2003  
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1700 times:

The first sections of concrete are going to be poured later this month for the new 6th runway.

The new runway will be 16,000ft. long and 200ft. wide and will be the longest commercial runway in North America.

It's main goal is to allow non-stop service to Asia which currently is not possible on any long-range widebody aircraft without severe weight restrictions. Tests have shown that the A340 is best fit for the job to operate to Asia with the current 12,000ft. runways, however it will still suffer severe weight restrictions which will make the flight not economical.

The new runway will allow fully loaded A340s, 777s, and 747s to take-off and fly on to Asia.

So far, JAL has expressed the most interest in operating a NRT-DEN flight. A couple months ago when the Mayor went to Japan, he met with JAL CEO's who expressed "great" interest to him in operating a non-stop flight to Denver (DEN) within the next few years.

Recently, ANA has also expressed interest, probably in response to JAL.

Here is the full article about the new runway:
http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2002/05/13/story1.html

I do think that there is definately a market for non-stop NRT service. I could see NRT-DEN coming in 2-4 years from now, and possibly a little earlier.

At a later stage in about 10 years or so, I could see non-stop service to HKG and some other Asian cities.

Regards


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineM27 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 314 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 1632 times:

BA:

Would like to know a little more about the tests that show an A340 is best fit to operate Asian flights. Which model A340, and who ran the tests? What did it test, range vs weight, range vs payload, or whatever?

Thanks in Advance


User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 1625 times:

M27,

I am not sure which A340 tested better. My guess is the A340-200 since it's smaller, and technically the longest ranged airliner CURRENTLY in airline service.

However it was very very close behind the 777. The 777 probably fell back since it is a much heavier and larger aircraft.

I am pretty sure they would have had to compare the A340-200 versus the 777-200ER and obviously the A340 will be the winner. Not exactly a fair comparison, but the point of the tests was to see which could do runs to Asia best.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1601 times:

I was hoping for it to be complete a little sooner than the Fall 03'. But..whatever floats their boat as long as they get it done in time.


I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineMlsrar From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 1417 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1592 times:

OK, sorry I had to add this, but they're going to put rebar in this time, right?


I mean, for the right price I’ll fight a lion. - Mike Tyson
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 5, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1563 times:

Mlsrar,

I have no idea. I'm sure they know what they are doing though.

I hope! Big grin

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineTWAMD-80 From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 1006 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1556 times:

16,000 feet - Wow! Thats a long runway!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



Two A-4's, left ten o'clock level continue left turn!
User currently offlineFlyinryan99 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 2001 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1547 times:

Instead of doing 2 touch and goes on a 12,000ft runway in the same pass, you could do 3 touch and goes in a C172. ;o)

Ry


User currently offlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1280 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1541 times:

6 runways! Clearly DEN is one of the busiest airports in the US. I guess most of the traffic is domestic, as I don't think there are many international flights out of DEN (yet).

The design of the terminal is absolutely beautiful.

Hkg82.


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8003 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1520 times:

I think that 4876-meter runway could also mean another thing: the possibility we may eventually see the A380-800 fly to DEN. We might even see LH A388's fly the FRA-DEN route during the winter at the height of the ski season.

User currently offlineJayhup From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 452 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1512 times:

The only way that DEN gets an LH A380 is if there is a lot of interline traffic that goes on to UA. Same thing goes for service to Asia. I could see NH because of their relationship with UA.....

JH


User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 11, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1474 times:

Before 9/11 struck, I heard that Lufthansa was planning on operating the 747-400 to Denver during the summer because of the incredibly high loads they experienced last summer. That has changed now though.

Its not surprise either, when I flew Lufthansa last summer, the flight was overbooked by more than 50 passengers. Luckily I wasn't selected to give up my seat.

I could see LH operating the A380 during the summertime.

Here is an article about the 6th runway in the Denver Post:
http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36%257E53%257E612465,00.html?search=filter

Here is a rendering of where the new runway will be located:


Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently onlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32723 posts, RR: 72
Reply 12, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1469 times:

Wether the loads were there or not, the 744 would not work on DEN-FRA. Weight and load restrictions. I read about it in I belive the Denver Business Journal. I doubt the A380 will be used to DEN. The A380 will be used on VERY, VERY dense routes and DEN is not one of them. In the US, JFK, MIA, and SFO fit the profile. DEL, NRT, SIN, BKK, and HKG will see them first, though.


a.
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 59
Reply 13, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1465 times:

MAH4546,

No, a 747-400 can fly from DEN to FRA easily. British Airways flew the 747-400 from DEN to LGW, for 8-9 months of the year (including summertime) the 747-400 can fly non-stop to Europe from Denver. It has a weight restriction, but not a very heavy one.

The problem in this story is Asia. Asia is not reachable, but Europe is absolutely no problem.

I disagree about DEN not getting the A380. During the summertime, BA and LH really fill up there planes. LH could use the A380 during the summertime when loads are very high.

If they've considered flying the 747-400 to DEN. Then why wouldn't they consider the A380?

Denver Int'l was built to handle the A380, future flying wings, and other aircraft.

One of the reasons why Denver's runways are so thick.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CLE's New Runway Gets Ready To Open posted Tue Dec 10 2002 18:42:47 by Clefan
AA Off Runway In DEN posted Sun May 29 2005 04:02:21 by F9darol
747 To Be Crashed On Live TV In Late Fall On FOX T posted Fri Sep 3 1999 06:17:16 by The Fly Guy's
in reference to 'Go-ahead For Heathrow Expansion' article posted Fri Dec 8 2006 20:05:12 by Itsonlyme
Eads In Talks To Sell Part Of Airbus posted Thu Nov 16 2006 07:41:00 by N1786b
Eads In Talks To Sell Part Of Airbus posted Thu Nov 16 2006 07:39:44 by N1786b
Eurostar In 2007: LON To PAR In 2h15, BRU In 1h51 posted Tue Nov 14 2006 12:03:35 by AF454GRU
Baby Dies In Flight To MAD posted Wed Oct 18 2006 13:19:13 by EZEIZA
EK Sends In Auditors To Assess New A380 Schedule posted Mon Oct 16 2006 13:21:11 by Leelaw
AA 762 In DEN posted Sat Sep 23 2006 18:20:28 by Longhornmaniac
AA 738 Off Runway In YUL posted Tue Nov 30 2010 18:59:54 by matt
Where Did The Classic Airplanes Fly To In The End? posted Sun Nov 28 2010 01:28:30 by captaink
UA DAL-DEN A Slap In The Face. posted Sat Oct 23 2010 07:03:58 by swa4life