United777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1657 posts, RR: 0 Posted (11 years 7 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1133 times:
What do you think about Seattle's future of becoming a major world hub or expansion of more international airlines? Seattle has only a few flights to Asia and Europe but alot of flights to Canada and Mexico thanks to it's hometown carriers, Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air.
American Airlines recently suspended flights from Tokyo from Seattle and Northwest Airlines suspended flights to Osaka and at one time use to fly from Seattle to Hong Kong even Thai Airways use to fly to Seattle.
The port of Seattle is still considering building a new international terminal where the cargo terminals are currently located. Do you think there is a future for this? What airlines do you think will start service to Seattle.
I think Vancouver and San Francisco take alot of the routes from Seattle. Vancouver is just a two hour drive flight from Seattle so if you want to fly to Hong Kong why not just drive to Vancouver and catch Cathay Pacific Airways. I think it is really odd Lufthansa flies to Denver but not Seattle.
Seattle has proved it's self to be a major world city so why isn't there any airlines starting service? The airport is expanding and going through alot of re-modelling.
What do you think, here are the airlines that currently flu to Seattle to international cities. Did I miss any?
United Airlines - Tokyo (777-200)
United Express - Vancouver
Northwest Airlines - Tokyo, Amsterdam (747-200)
Alaska Airlines - Mexico, Canada
Horizon Air - Canada
Asiana Airlines - Seoul (B777-200)
EVA Air - Taipei (747-400)
British Airways - London (747-400)
SAS - Copenhagen (A340-300, 767-300?)
Kwbl From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 441 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (11 years 7 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1069 times:
I could see SEA getting more international flights in the near future. They have recently had a great increase in domestic flights and with PDX losing DL transpacific, the door is open. However, as you mentioned, there is alot of competition at YVR. Also, even though PDX lost it's service, there is still a market large enough for one or 2 flights across the ocean. PDX will market itself very aggressively for new service and YVR has done it for years. SEA will be in position to do the same. As for LH in Denver, it is primarily because of the code-share with UA
Justplanesmart From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 707 posts, RR: 2 Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1071 times:
Aeroflot serves SVO from SEA with the 777-200; I believe the routing is SFO-SEA-SVO. In addition, the NW flights to AMS are with DC-10's, AFAIK. In the past, Seattle had flights such as JAL to Tokyo, NW to Seoul, UA to Hongkong and Heathrow, & Finnair to Helsinki. I also find it difficult to believe that there is not enough demand for other flights (in good economic times) to other major cities, particularly in Europe. Certainly Frankfurt or Paris should generate enough traffic for a weekly flight.
Erikr From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 108 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted (11 years 7 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1002 times:
Air Canada serves Toronto with a daily flight. I think with an A319 or A320.
To add a bit of history, Martinair used to fly 2/3 charters to Amsterdam per week during the summer years ago using first DC-10s, 747-200s, and finally 767-300s. I think these flights were discontinued as NW starting making daily flights.
There are some international cargo flights. Martinair does make a flight or two to AMS. I think CargoLux does Luxembourg. China Airlines flies into Taipei.
Searpqx From Netherlands, joined Jun 2000, 4343 posts, RR: 11 Reply 5, posted (11 years 7 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 988 times:
Seattle has seen a fair amount of international service, especially Asian, come and go. NW had started to build SEA into a significant secondary gateway (NRT, KIX, SEL, HKG) before the Asian economy tanked. China Southern also served the area for awhile.
I think Seattle will continue to play an important role as a secondary gateway, but the focus will be more on O&D traffic. We just don't have the level of feed that SFO, LAX and YVR have to sustain a lot of connecting markets (hence AA's cancelling the SEA-NRT run).
"The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity"
SailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6 Reply 6, posted (11 years 7 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 922 times:
I know for sure that before 9-11, LH was interested in flying FRA-SEA daily with an A343. I do know not what has happened to these plans meanwhile, but it traffic increases, I think we could see that flight around 2004.
OA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5156 posts, RR: 25 Reply 8, posted (11 years 7 months 23 hours ago) and read 897 times:
Well both AF and LH have expressed interest in serving SEA so one should expect to see service to both CDG and FRA in the near future. The problem with SEA is that, as stated by others, it is does not have the feed of SFO, LAX, YVR, etc. Furthermore, its position at the far northeast of the US means that it cannot work as an effective transatlantic hub except for north-south west coast connections. As a result, airlines flying into SEA must rely on a greater degree of O&D traffic than at places such as DEN. This I would argue, is what has prevented more European carriers from serving the airport.
Alexinwa From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1127 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted (11 years 7 months 21 hours ago) and read 863 times:
The new North Terminal will NOT be for international traffic. That will stay at the South satellite. The new North Terminal will be a 40 gate addition to SEA-TAC. United will be 1st up in the bidding for how many gates and the location when it is built. It is part of the master plan with the 3rd runway and a new North ground transportation area that will link SEA-TAC with downtown via light rail.
My dream for SEA-TAC
UA or LH SEA-FRA
UA or NW or CX SEA-HKG
Alexinwa From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1127 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (11 years 7 months 19 hours ago) and read 825 times:
It did fly it. Twice actually. It started when they got the heather slots with a 763 and a 747sp. Then they cut it for a few months. Started again and then cut it for good. The slots went to ORD/SFO/LAX/JFK/IAD/EWR.