Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing Trying To Change South African's Choice  
User currently offlineReggaebird From Jamaica, joined Nov 1999, 1176 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2235 times:


Hi all,

I was reading a very interesting article from an African business magazine which said that Boeing is secretly working behind the scenes to overturn South African Airways' recent decision to replace the majority of its Boeing fleet with Airbus aircraft.

The article said that Boeing's loss of this important customer was not due to product or pricing considerations. The main issue was that the South Africans were reacting to the botched (and some say illegal) selection process that resulted in an order for Boeing 737-800's in the late 1990's. It seems that the former CEO of SAA was American and pushed through the order for American aircraft. Apparently, Boeing has quietly acknowledged the problems from the previous order and has been forgiven by the SAA leadership. As a result, they are now in a better frame of mind to consider Boeing's products.

The article went on to say that Boeing is proposing a mixture of 777's (-200ER and -200LR), 767's (-300ER and/or -400ER) and 757's (-200) for the bulk of SAA's needs. In addition, SAA is seriously interested in the new 747XQLR as a longer term replacement for it's ageing fleet of 747-400's.

I was stunned to learn about this activity! I have heard about failed and successful attempts to change fleet decisions before but never anything on this scale. I also wondered what, if any, penalties the airline would incur and whether Boeing would absorb those penalties.

Although I am a major Boeing fan, I wonder if this kind of activity is good for the company in the long run. If they are doing this now, can Airbus be far behind? What will it do to the industry if orders are not as "firm" as they used to be?



29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2169 times:

I wonder if this kind of activity is good for the company in the long run. If they are doing this now, can Airbus be far behind? What will it do to the industry if orders are not as "firm" as they used to be?

This has always gone on. It'll be better for Boeing in the long run with a 100 plane order than being "moral".


User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2148 times:

I think we can trust in SA's management to make a decision which is right for their airline....in that context, it doesn't really matter whether Boeing or Airbus are trying to secretely dissuade SA from opting one or the other-they will make a choice which makes sense to their particular operation, and that is the end of the story.

Cheers


User currently offlineAerosol From Germany, joined Oct 2000, 558 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2088 times:

April again?
Sorry but I can`t take these news (SQ, Qantas and others) serious anymore!


User currently offlineTravellin'man From United States of America, joined May 2001, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2062 times:

The 738's were also controversial for the silly reason that they didn't get the right seats for them initially, maybe just in business class, and so passengers complained about comfort level, and grew to dislike the plane. I say silly because that seems to be a fairly fixable problem. Maybe there was more under the surface, as everyone is pointing out here.


It is not enough to be rude; one must also be incorrect.
User currently offlineReggaebird From Jamaica, joined Nov 1999, 1176 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2037 times:

Aerosol,

I do not understand what you were trying to say. Please clarify, if possible.



User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2026 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

SAA is seriously interested in the new 747XQLR as a longer term replacement for it's ageing fleet of 747-400's.

I wouldn't say they're ageing, some are realtively new while some are in mid-life, but not ageing.  Smile

Arsenal@LHR



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2020 times:

I hope Boeing can persuade SAA to change their mind and go for the 777-200ER with RR Trent 800s instead of the sluggish CFM56-5C powered A340-300.

User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1995 times:

There was more than met the eye for the SAA order. I read that the Airbus order was part of a broader government initiative to improve relations with Europe. This was according to the aerospace analyst at Goldman Sachs. I cannot remember his name. The whole business about people not liking the 738 was weird. They got rid of the A320s for 738 and now are returning to the 320.

User currently offlineMD-11 forever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1988 times:

TEDSKI
What's your problem with the "sluggish CFM56-5C powered A340-300"? You're talking about a plane that serves several major airlines like CX, AF, LH and so on pretty well. Also, thes "sluggish" engines are pretty well if it comes to economy to operate them. I'm kind of fed up with these posts about the so called underpowered A340-300!!! Besides that, it hasn't got anything to do with the topic....
Bacvk to topic, I guess it's a part of the business game they are playing now, but to me it seems as if Boeing is becoming desperate to sell their planes at any cost...... Also it seems that an order once knows as "firm" has stopped to exist in this business?
Just my humble idea...

Cheers, Thomas


User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1971 times:

I misspoke earlier but not by a lot. Here is the article I was referring to:

http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=boeing080&date=20020308&query=south+african


User currently offlineAreopagus From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1369 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1966 times:

What was claimed to have been illegal? If the problem is that the former CEO of SAA was American and pushed through the order for American aircraft, then that's not exactly Boeing's fault. If Boeing has quietly acknowledged the problems from the previous order and has been forgiven by the SAA, then there must have been something in particular that they are alleged to have done wrong. Does anyone in this forum know?

User currently offlineReggaebird From Jamaica, joined Nov 1999, 1176 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1963 times:

Arsenal@LHR,

Thanks for pointing out the issue with the "ageing" phrase. However, I did mention that the 747XQLR's were of "longer term" interest, i.e. not immediately.

It should be noted that the first four 744's in SAA's fleet are now about 10 or 11 years old. At 15 years old, they are officially classified as "ageing" and will require special ageing aircraft maintenance. With that in mind, I really wasn't that far off.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



User currently offlineBA DC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2001, 145 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1902 times:

SAA management will have chosen airbus aircraft for their performance, economy and reliability, which in the long run are more important than the initial ouput. Whether airbus or boeing aircraft are better than each other, SAA made that decision, and after commiting so much i fail to see how it would benefit SAA to change the order.



User currently offlineSAS23 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1876 times:

The South African government - like just about every other African government - is incredibly corrupt. The ANC jumped on the gravy train on 27 April 1994 and it's gaining momentum on a daily basis.

Interestingly, it was Andersen (yep, as in Enron!) that recommended to SAA's board that they should go Boeing. Unfortunately, the -800 is not a hot and high performer and they have been an absolute disaster in every way for SAA.

I am sure that if Boeing offer the right "incentives" to various government ministers (4WDs are very popular there!  Big grin ) then they will get the contract ... until Airbus offer them more.

If you can't take a joke, don't come to Africa! Big grin Big grin Big grin



User currently offlineManni From South Korea, joined Nov 2001, 4221 posts, RR: 23
Reply 15, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1863 times:

After China Airlines it is now SAA. I wonder were people keep getting these stories from. BTW, any news on the 10 777-300s that were due to replace Virgin Atlantic's 10 A340-600s?  Big grin

It looks like every big airline is interested in the 747WATHEVER, but no one is ordering it! Big grin

Let me predict who's next. Qatar Airways is seriously interested in the 747WATHEVER and the Sonic Cruiser, it seeks to replace the ordered A380 and A330 aircraft with these fine Boeing products. After Bush secretly admitted that he is a muslim the board of Qatar has changed her mind about the fleet renewal. Big grin  Smile Big grin




SUPPORT THE LEBANESE CIVILIANS
User currently offlineLj From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4418 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1855 times:

I hope that SA sticks with the A320s. Those lovely ex-SA B737-800s look very good in Transavia livery.  Big grin

User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13184 posts, RR: 77
Reply 17, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1811 times:

I understood that SAA also have A340-600's on order, as well as 'sluggish' A340-300's.
Still, SAA cannot know anything about hot and high requirements can they?


User currently offlineQatarAirways From Qatar, joined Sep 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1790 times:

I don't think that SAA will change thier minds. We keep hearing these stories with VS, CI, QF, SQ and now SAA.

Manni,
Actually Qatar Airways have said that they will buy the Sonic Cruiser if Boeing's promises are true.


Regards,
QatarAirways
Aviation Gulf


User currently offlineSA-JET From South Africa, joined May 2000, 297 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1778 times:

Just for the record; the last time a European company (Daimler Chrysler) tried to "persuade" some government officials to purchase certain equipment (army) and offered 4wd cars-the entire thing blew up so badly, some are still trying to recover from the fallout. The Daimler CEO for Southern Africa has been fired and is back in Germany awaiting trial on charges of fraud.(as well as in SA) The government official who took the heat is ANC ex-chief parliamentary whip Tony Yengeni-who was fired. So, 4wd presents might work in other parts of Africa, but NOT in my country!!
All this crap about Boeing now trying to persuade high gov officials to now cxl a multi billion dollar deal and go Boeing...please.


User currently offlineJAL From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 5083 posts, RR: 8
Reply 20, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1730 times:

I hope that this is true.


Work Hard But Play Harder
User currently offlineReggaebird From Jamaica, joined Nov 1999, 1176 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (12 years 3 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1670 times:

Qatarairways,

You should remember that Boeing successfully overturned SQ's committment to the Airbuse A340-300. The whole fleet is being progressively replaced by Boeing 777's.



User currently offlineSetjet From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 1119 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (12 years 3 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1611 times:

"After China Airlines it is now SAA. I wonder were people keep getting these stories from. BTW, any news on the 10 777-300s that were due to replace Virgin Atlantic's 10 A340-600s?"

Manni: Just read the initial post and you will see where people (in this case Reggaebird) get these stories (in that case from an African Business Magazine).

"Unfortunately, the -800 is not a hot and high performer and they have been an absolute disaster in every way for SAA."

SAS23: The 737NG can't be bad in "every way" for SAA, they are using the -200 almost since it was introduced. Although you might be right that it isn't a hot and high performer, can you prove your point by comparing it to the A320 please?


User currently offlineSaa737-244 From South Africa, joined Jan 2000, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (12 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1509 times:

SAS23's comments earlier cannot go unchallenged, as they are either speculation, opinion, or just plain incorrect:

The South African government - like just about every other African government - is incredibly corrupt. The ANC jumped on the gravy train on 27 April 1994 and it's gaining momentum on a daily basis.

Not exactly on topic, but sure, there are some corrupt officials here - one reads about them occasionally in the free press that we have in South Africa, when they are exposed and arrested. Corruption is a crime in this country, as several jailed officials caught on the take can testify. The incidence of it is no more prevalent than in other developing countries of similar economic strength.

Interestingly, it was Andersen (yep, as in Enron!) that recommended to SAA's board that they should go Boeing.

That is not correct. The company consulting SAA on the shorthaul fleet choice that resulted in the 738 order was Bain & Co, American CEO Coleman Andrews's old firm. An old friend of mine was working for Bain in Johannesburg at the time, and was involved in this.

Unfortunately, the -800 is not a hot and high performer and they have been an absolute disaster in every way for SAA.

An exaggeration, in both respects. There are two main problems with the 738 in SAA service (the second being a partial spinoff of the first), neither of which has been mentioned here: cargo container capability & capacity; and turnaround times.
Much of the pressure on SAA to switch back to Airbus aircraft has come from freight companies which used to rely on SAA's A300s and A320s to transport their perishables intercity in the past. The 738s don't take the LD3 containers used in that industry, whereas the A320/319 can (in 46W form).
When SAA's management said that the 738 hadn't lived up to expectations they were referring specifically to the turnaround time issue.
These problems are common knowledge in SA aviation circles.


User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (12 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

Thanks for filling in the missing facts.

25 Post contains images Udo : I have nothing to add here, except....
26 Joni : Trying to recover already lost tenders is routine in many industries. It rarely works, of course, but it's worth the try.
27 Post contains images Klaus : ...and floating rumours about it can help persuading your next prospective customer, of course...
28 Alessandro : So does the US invest in SA? I know that Ford assembles cars in SA, but compared with VW,BMW and Daimler-Chrysler its not much ,can this be a part of
29 Cba : "Unfortunately, the -800 is not a hot and high performer and they have been an absolute disaster in every way for SAA". I recall that SAA ditched the
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rude Cabin Crew Trying To Change! posted Sun Feb 12 2006 19:24:06 by Concorde001
Corsair 744 To Our South African Friends posted Tue Mar 8 2005 20:15:13 by FCKC
Boeing Trying To Avoid Spat With Airbus posted Thu Sep 23 2004 16:22:39 by Nyc777
To All South African Aviation Fans posted Sat Mar 9 2002 16:51:02 by Saa-sal
Boeing Trying To Sell 767s To US Military posted Tue Nov 13 2001 13:38:01 by Republic
Kulula.com Set To "Leave" South African Airspace posted Wed Jan 25 2006 19:18:42 by SA7700
South African ZS-SBK Name Change? posted Mon Sep 5 2005 10:53:03 by Springbok139
South African To IAD posted Mon Apr 11 2005 14:41:34 by Stretch 8
What's Happening To South African 744's? posted Fri Sep 3 2004 06:37:44 by Jonniesa
South African: Airbus Long-haul, Boeing Short-haul posted Thu Apr 29 2004 03:55:54 by Cancidas