Dellatorre From Brazil, joined May 2000, 1087 posts, RR: 2 Posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2383 times:
Both flights will be introduced on October 29th and also will be operated by 767-300ER. I am a bit surprising with this decision. I think the São Paulo flight could somehow work, but the Ezeiza flight is likely to fail.
FutureFO From St. Vincent and the Grenadines, joined Oct 2001, 3118 posts, RR: 22 Reply 1, posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2353 times:
I disagree. Both flights will succeed based on the Argentinian and Brazil residents of the Northern Va and So. Md area as well as the feeder service from UAX and other Mainline service that they will work.
SWALUVFA From United States of America, joined May 2002, 277 posts, RR: 6 Reply 5, posted (11 years 6 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2309 times:
Is UAL taking these routes from ORD or JFK? Or are they just adding them in addition to ORD, JFK, and MIA? I think that they will both work. The California transcons and the Europe flights will all connect very well with both of them. Not to mention the express flights from smaller cities.
FutureFO From St. Vincent and the Grenadines, joined Oct 2001, 3118 posts, RR: 22 Reply 7, posted (11 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2247 times:
UAL is removing the service from JFK and transplanting the service to IAD. So the routes will be covered from IAD-ORD-MIA. Also IAD does not have an overconcentration of flights for UA. And it will be daily service on 767-300ER equipment with a flight time of just under 9 hours to GRU and just a touch over 10 hours to EZE. Configuration will be 10F/32C/152Y.