Dellatorre From Brazil, joined May 2000, 1084 posts, RR: 2 Posted (11 years 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1840 times:
Both flights will be introduced on October 29th and also will be operated by 767-300ER. I am a bit surprising with this decision. I think the São Paulo flight could somehow work, but the Ezeiza flight is likely to fail.
FutureFO From New Caledonia, joined Oct 2001, 3095 posts, RR: 24 Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1810 times:
I disagree. Both flights will succeed based on the Argentinian and Brazil residents of the Northern Va and So. Md area as well as the feeder service from UAX and other Mainline service that they will work.
SWALUVFA From United States of America, joined May 2002, 272 posts, RR: 7 Reply 5, posted (11 years 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1766 times:
Is UAL taking these routes from ORD or JFK? Or are they just adding them in addition to ORD, JFK, and MIA? I think that they will both work. The California transcons and the Europe flights will all connect very well with both of them. Not to mention the express flights from smaller cities.
FutureFO From New Caledonia, joined Oct 2001, 3095 posts, RR: 24 Reply 7, posted (11 years 3 days ago) and read 1704 times:
UAL is removing the service from JFK and transplanting the service to IAD. So the routes will be covered from IAD-ORD-MIA. Also IAD does not have an overconcentration of flights for UA. And it will be daily service on 767-300ER equipment with a flight time of just under 9 hours to GRU and just a touch over 10 hours to EZE. Configuration will be 10F/32C/152Y.