Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Long Beach Says No To AS - Tells AA Only Until 1/6  
User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6006 posts, RR: 27
Posted (13 years 12 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2909 times:

Long Beach has told Alaska Airlines that they will not be given any slots for the service scheduled to start in Sept. The city feels that giving AS slots on Sept 9 that will go to JetBlue on Oct 9 makes no sense, especially since AS has no other service at LGB at this time.

Meantime, LGB has sent a slot lease agreement to AA. In the agreement, AA is getting the use of 4 temporary slots only until Jan 6, when it appears that JB will add service.

Full details:

"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 12 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2860 times:

What?!?!? What is this happended with AS want go to LGB slots and it say no to AS. This is due to the slots into Long Beach, CA airport. And when is start first Jetblue want give up more slots to the new cities at OAK, SLC, and LAS flight. This is will have to fifth flight to JFK on October 2002. I knew that as for all the information as for myself. Isn't that was correct one? Please let me know if you guys know do something. Thanks!!

User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 43
Reply 2, posted (13 years 12 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2857 times:

Now what do you suppose will happen when 1/6 rolls around and with AA in place, the fun that LGB is going to have serving AA with "eviction" papers.

You know exactly how this is going to work out....AA is going to stall it in court over some legal technicality, and en essence achieve a de facto long term permanent presence.

What was LGB thinking when they allowed these "temporary" slots?

User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4028 posts, RR: 31
Reply 3, posted (13 years 12 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2736 times:

Regarding Alaska, I wonder if they might consider letting Horizon operate the route with regional jets.


User currently offlineJmacias34 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 380 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 12 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2708 times:

I was going to suggest the same thing LoneStarMike. LGB has a cap of 25 Regional slots, correct? I think that route would be more effective instead of using an MD80 which would be hard to fill once jetBlue finalizes plans to SEA and PDX.

User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11200 posts, RR: 57
Reply 5, posted (13 years 12 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2669 times:

So JetBlue is going to use those 4 slots on January 6?

Anyone have any idea where they will be used to?

My guess is SEA and DEN.


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineAirDD From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 375 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 12 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2655 times:

I dont think that AS is really interested in RJ slots, their main focus, like AA, is to block the slots for Jetblue.

AS & especially AA seem to totally freak out at the prospect of Jetblue in LGB.

AA is offering triple miles on the flights LGB-JFK

Seems like AA is trying to pull the same thing they did at DAL killing Legend Airlines.


User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 34612 posts, RR: 70
Reply 7, posted (13 years 12 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2649 times:

FLL-LGB, 07Jan03. I'm almost certain of it. DEN and SEA are likely, and so is a reduction of OAK flights. BOS is a possiblity, but with AA being kicked out, I think ORD has a good chance.

User currently offlinePenguinflies From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 996 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 12 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 2610 times:

What is funny is that this same thing happened back in the '80s

JetAmerica started as an outfit who flew out of LGB with MD-80s with some success with routes like ORD and DFW. AA got MD-80s later and started flying out of LGB too. After a while, JetAmerica became unstable and was merged with Alaska.

Alaska stopped flying to LGB and AA pulled out because there was no longer a hugh demand (the demand was a result from the low fares JetAmerica published).

User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 12 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2557 times:

Well, From what I can see in this LGB situation. jetBlue is gonna kick some ass. I cannot wait until January 6. I want to read the news when AA gets "eviction" notices too. AA f***ed with Legend and shut them down. But they ought to know not to mess with jetBlue. Same goes to jetBlue. They shouldn't go to fast or they are bound to slip in one of AA's traps.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Venezuelan Govt Says NO To AA Flights SJU-Porlamar posted Tue Jun 21 2005 15:47:14 by Luisde8cd
LGB Says No To AA In Administrative Hearing posted Tue May 14 2002 17:31:43 by FATFlyer
Boeing Says No To Southwest! posted Tue Nov 28 2006 05:57:44 by Bringiton
FAA Says No To JAT For U.S And Canada Flights. posted Tue Apr 25 2006 16:59:16 by Wolsingerjet
America West Says NO To Fargo posted Thu Oct 13 2005 04:33:01 by Azstar
Canada Says No To Universal posted Fri Dec 3 2004 14:40:33 by LatinAviation
CO Says No To GNV posted Thu Jan 15 2004 15:00:34 by FlyPNS1
Usxp Says No To NAA posted Mon Nov 24 2003 22:13:43 by LatinAviation
Accc Says NO To Qantas/Air New Zealand posted Tue Sep 9 2003 02:41:07 by AJ
Ryanair Says NO To American Express posted Fri Jun 20 2003 16:39:01 by Britair