Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Phase II Expansion For NW At DTW  
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7711 posts, RR: 27
Posted (12 years 6 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1899 times:

Just new this week, NW plans to start phase II on the WorldGateway in Detroit.

Thursday and Friday, there was newspaper articles and news reports about changes coming to Concourse B & C out at DTW. NW is studying how to change the operations of Concourse C which haven't exactly worked as well as planned for the regional ops. They mentioned how Concourse C will be rebuild or reconfigured to improve operations. Also, gates will be added onto Concourse B.

I agree, that Concourse C doesn't exactly work as well as it should. The waiting area is way too small for the number of passengers and there can also be a shortage of gate space at times. People don't understand how to use the waiting room doors and don't line up properly. Good thing changes are coming quickly to make this new place even better.

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyCMH From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 2287 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1887 times:

Great to hear. I think this will definitely help the gate situation at Concourse C. It's a great facility, and the improvements should make it even better.

User currently offlineDTW/ORD Fan! From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 288 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 6 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1844 times:

Do you know when all of this is supposed to start?? Whne will construction begin??

User currently offlineDTW/ORD Fan! From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 288 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1834 times:

Oh yea, I forgot, how many gates will NW be adding to B concourse as well???? Thanks again!

User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 23 hours ago) and read 1796 times:

DTW/ORD Fan,

I got it an for the 8 gates by the concourse B only as for small concourse. That is one as for useing on Continental Airlines into the concourse B. Ok? Hope this is your helped itself on the New terminal. Thanks!!


User currently offlineCV640 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 952 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (12 years 6 months 23 hours ago) and read 1788 times:

It is a shame about the C concourse as the rest of the DTW terminal is near perfect. Lots of room and space, well lighted and easily laid out. The C boarding area is just far too small. It would have been far too small without the CRJs, but adding them just made the problem aparent from week 1. People are always confused and crowded by the boarding area, always see people linning up at the wrong gate. Plus if the come in one one the AIrlink flights they et conused on where to go, especially if takig another Airlink flight out.

I just wish people had looked a head a little more, regional operations are far to impotant for todays airlines to do something like this.


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7711 posts, RR: 27
Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 20 hours ago) and read 1764 times:

If you've been out to C, you know it doesn't work.

The plans call for adding 9 mainline gates onto Concourse B. Currently Concourse B has only 8 gates, and CO has 3 of them. The remaining 5 are used for the Arvo's.

Concourse C will be be demolished and replaced with a two story structure with 41 gates and individual gate areas, like a real concourse.

Construction is supposed to start Fall 2002 and be complete in 2004.

Now, question is where will Concourse C ops go during construction??? Is the Golfcourse-type operation going to be reincarnated with the shuttle busses????? What can they salvage from the new place, can they use those regional jetways from a two story building? Interesting


User currently offlineFlyinryan99 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 2025 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (12 years 6 months 18 hours ago) and read 1742 times:

PSU...do you happen to have links to those articles?? If not it's ok..I'd just like to read them.
=o)

Ry


User currently offlineDeltaShuttle From United States of America, joined May 1999, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 6 months 16 hours ago) and read 1728 times:

Flyinryan99,

Here is a link to one of the articles on Northwest's possible plans for the Midfield Terminal.

http://detnews.com/2002/business/0205/30/b01-501958.htm

Delta Shuttle


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7711 posts, RR: 27
Reply 9, posted (12 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1666 times:

Sorry, I don't have any links it was on Ch. 7 News the other night.

Unfortuntely, when NW & Wayne County designed the Midfield Terminal complex, they underestimated regional operations, and the whole landscape of regional operations has changed drastically in the past few years. Plans were created in the mid to late 90's. We're talking around 1997-1998. At that point in time, regional airlines where still somewhat of an afterthought compared to mainline operations. The industry, and especially NW was still heavily relying on turboprops. Well, things have changes, RJ growth has exploded, and NW quickly has jumped into the game with that. Airlines have realized how important the regional operations are to their mainline feed, and many new routes have been opened and become economically feasible with RJ's. 25 Regional gates with a common waiting area may have worked a few years ago, but definetely not now. Actually the current waiting area in Concourse C appears to be smaller than the old Concourse G in the Davey terminal.

Its good to see that NW realized that the infrastructure for their regional operations was insufficent and will be doing something about it. Its a good thing too, one could only wonder what they would be doing in the near future without it, given the many, many more CRJ's they have on order.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NWA's Phase II Expansion At DTW-use? posted Fri Jun 7 2002 16:16:08 by DTW/ORD Fan!
Intentions For J.M Davey At DTW posted Tue Dec 16 2003 06:27:59 by Avion346
A Hassle For NW At MEM; Bedlam For FedEx? posted Wed Jul 23 2003 05:37:38 by JohnJ
Best Photo Ops For NW Planes(DTW Or MSP) posted Wed Dec 5 2001 20:06:29 by Midway DC9-10
NW Hub's At DTW & MSP posted Wed Oct 25 2006 02:32:43 by RedTailDTW
North Air Terminal Expansion At DTW OK'd posted Fri Mar 24 2006 20:11:52 by KarlB737
Airbus Employees Doing Maintenance At MSP For NW posted Thu Jun 30 2005 22:05:39 by KarlB737
UA/NW Approved For ORD-PVG/DTW-NRT-CAN posted Fri Jul 23 2004 18:44:28 by MAH4546
NW Keeps Growing At DTW posted Thu Jun 17 2004 18:39:03 by Boeing757/767
Shy NW A330s At DTW posted Sat Mar 13 2004 00:35:04 by ManchesterMAN