Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA (Longon-MCO) Equipment?  
User currently offlineFlynavy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 691 times:

I'm confused. I've heard talk of BA replacing the 744 with the 772 on its MCO operations beginning June 1. Is this true? Today, June 3, I saw a BA 744 on approach into MCO. I believe the aircraft was G-BNLN (see http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=G-BNLN). I'm not sure of the exactly registraton, but it did have a teal/blue-colored tail. Regardless, that aircraft being a 744, when can we expect a BA 772 at MCO?

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32604 posts, RR: 72
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 680 times:

BA 772s to MCO starts in July.


a.
User currently offlineEnglandair From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2000, 2228 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 633 times:

I think it's very interesting that VS is dominant over BA in a US city! VS has 3 daily 747 services into MCO (one from MAN) where as BA are down grading the route to a B777! Who'd have thought it possible 18 years ago...!

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chris Sheldon



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Hall



User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32604 posts, RR: 72
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 602 times:

Englandair, I don't think it is amazing. Orlando-London yields are pretty pathetic, especially compared to other city's. Virgin Atlantic can handle the lower yields and still make a profit, British Airways cannot.


a.
User currently offlineEnglandair From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2000, 2228 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 600 times:

Yeilds to VS's leisure destinations aren't actually pathetic! Economy is often jam packed and Premium and Upper Class are often fairly full too.
And yes I'd say it is pretty amazing that an airline that started with just one 747 up against extreamly feirce competition has done so well, when everyone said they'd fail, actually!


User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32604 posts, RR: 72
Reply 5, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 594 times:

Englandair, as I said, Virgin is able to make a lot of money serving destinations like Orlando and Las Vegas that have weak yields, BA is too business passenger-oriented. Yields to Orlando ARE pathetic, but Virgin is able to make a profit with them.


a.
User currently offline727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 6386 posts, RR: 17
Reply 6, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 594 times:

Funny you should ask, I just checked BA's website yesterday& it says the flight is NOW a 777-200.


Listen Betty, don't start up with your 'White Zone' s*** again.
User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8894 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 576 times:

The reason for the switch to a 777 is that BA is going to only have 777s flying longhaul out of LGW, as the 744s are going to be transferred to Heathrow. My assumption is that it will be one of the VII 777s operating this route.

Jeff


User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5489 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 559 times:

BA today is a 744. I thought the 777 switch was in mid June?

User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5231 posts, RR: 25
Reply 9, posted (12 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 544 times:

I second MAH4546s sentiments. In several ways, VS and BA are completely different operations. One of these is, as MAH pointed out, the fact that VS can fly low-yielding flights profitably while BA cannot. MCO is traditionally a very low-yield destination from Europe. Don't believe me, just look at the number of European charter airlines that serve the airport. Also, IIRC BA is using one of those specially configured 777s on the MCO route that feature only Club World, WT+, and WT, no first class. If it were a high yielding flight for BA they would certainly be flying either a 4-class or 3-class 777 equipped with First Class on the route.


Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA LGW-BLQ Equipment Question posted Fri Aug 10 2007 04:44:33 by Ualcsr
BA#9602 MCO-LGW 29 Sept. posted Wed Nov 30 2005 08:33:54 by SCXmechanic
Near Riot For BA In MCO posted Thu Feb 17 2005 06:26:35 by VSFullThrottle
BA To MCO posted Fri Sep 7 2001 16:22:25 by Dens
BA LGW-DEN Equipment Questions. posted Thu Dec 14 2000 00:35:45 by CX747
BA Club World LGW-MCO In July posted Sat Jul 12 2008 03:36:33 by CAD
BA Double Flights To MCO Starting April. posted Thu Dec 13 2007 08:59:51 by Readytotaxi
BA V Virgin To MCO From LGW,the Fuel Costs. posted Sun Dec 10 2006 18:32:38 by Readytotaxi
BA 777 & 747 At MCO On 10-23? posted Tue Oct 24 2006 07:56:33 by Swatpamike
BA Connect BRS-EDI/GLA Equipment posted Mon Feb 27 2006 19:24:12 by Sevenair