Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA 587 Update  
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1111 times:

A new NTSB press release, below are some of the witness stats.

The Witness Group has received 349 accounts from eyewitnesses, either through direct interviews or through written statements. An initial summary of those statements follows:

· 52% specifically reported seeing a fire while the plane was in the air, with the fuselage being the most often cited location (22%). Other areas cited as a fire location were the left engine, the right engine or an unspecified engine, and the left wing, the right wing or an unspecified wing.
· 8% specifically reported seeing an explosion.
· 20% specifically reported seeing no fire at all.
· 22% reported observing smoke; 20% reported no smoke.
· 18% reported observing the airplane in a right turn; another 18% reported observing the airplane in a left turn.
· 13% observed the airplane "wobbling," dipping" or in "side to side" motion.
· 74% observed the airplane descend.
· 57% reported seeing "something" separate from the airplane; 13% reported observing the right wing, left wing or an undefined wing separate; 9% specifically reported observing no parts separate.


More here http://www.ntsb.gov/pressrel/2002/020604.htm

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyingbronco05 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3840 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1084 times:

What's up with this post? What happened to flight 587 and stuff?


Never Trust Your Fuel Gauge
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1073 times:

AA 587? The A300-600R?

User currently offlineBlatantEcho From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1896 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1009 times:

hum, AA 587 crashed after takeoff from JKF into a grouping of houses. All aboard the A300-600R died and so did some people on the ground. Rudder seperation occured after the plane encountered wake-turbulence.

No reason yet for why the tail seperate, but the above numbers are terribly interesting in the difference of stories people have when they are called as eye-witnesses.

Bronco, do you talk like you type and stuff?  Big grin



They're not handing trophies out today
User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1009 times:

Hope they don't use that in the crash report !!

User currently offlineRai From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 996 times:

Being from New York and familiar with JFK takeoff and landing patterns, there is no way the plane was making a right turn that day. It took off from RWY 31R that day and all flights which take off from that runway immediately bank left after take-off. I wonder what the 18% who saw a right turn were seeing.

User currently offlineJcxp15 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 997 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 985 times:

It most likely means a right turn after the plane had departed and already made the initial left turn

User currently offlineFlyingbronco05 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3840 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 925 times:

Oh ok. Sorry. I know what you are talking about. So AA and the FAA don't know what caused the accident?


Never Trust Your Fuel Gauge
User currently offlineSailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (11 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 897 times:

Obviously, eyewitnesses are no good when it comes to aircraft accidents.
Most people say that "there was a big explosion", or "the aircraft fell apart mid-air", or "the aircraft came down" (my favourite one).

SailorOrion


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA #587 Crash, Any Update Info On This Crash Yet? posted Thu Sep 12 2002 04:07:37 by Bobcat
Another AA 587 Crash Update posted Wed Jan 16 2002 20:13:36 by 777236ER
AA 587 Subject To Maritime Law posted Fri May 12 2006 21:28:17 by Dc10s4ever
AA-587 Crashed 4 Years Ago Today posted Sat Nov 12 2005 23:35:04 by KC135TopBoom
Senator Calls For 2nd Look At AA 587 posted Fri Apr 8 2005 21:47:32 by QQflyboy
AA 587 Reopened? posted Tue Jan 11 2005 05:50:44 by NightFlier
Stored AA M80s; Update? posted Tue Dec 28 2004 08:34:14 by The777Man
AA 587 Crash 3 Years Ago posted Thu Nov 11 2004 22:27:25 by Ltbewr
Ntsb Concludes AA 587 Investigation posted Thu Sep 16 2004 07:18:48 by Qqflyboy
AA 587 Linked To Al Qaeda posted Mon Sep 13 2004 19:01:32 by Qqflyboy