Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Swiss:Alliance With BA/Oneworld May Be A Faliure  
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13745 posts, RR: 19
Posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3249 times:

SWISS Chairman Pieter Bouw has said that the planned alliance with BAW and Oneworld could be a faliure becuase of the tight regulations regarding LHR landing slots.

"This (failure) would mean that Swiss (Air Lines) wouldn't get complete access to the global alliance OneWorld."

"We would like to be able to work together, however there are some very difficult issues, for example the slots at London Heathrow, that are very difficult to solve."

More information at the Annanova and Reuters/Yahoo websites



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineIwantaBBJ From Switzerland, joined Jun 2002, 777 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3215 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Slots are always a problem at LHR, it seems, but I don't understand the problem; Why could the (non-)availability of slots at LHR be dangerous for those alliance-plans?

IwantaBBJ


User currently offlineSwiss-airplane From Switzerland, joined May 2000, 591 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 3176 times:

I still hope that Swiss can join to the Onewold Alliance very soon. I don't understand the slot problem too. I hope this is not true. I only heard that Finnair and Qantas and Iberia and of course AA wants that Swiss joins Oneworld.
greets, Mike


User currently offlineETA Unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2089 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 3158 times:

Sounds like Swiss just found their excuse to NOT join oneworld!

User currently offline747firstclass From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3142 times:

Swiss knows that AA will be part of oneworld. At some point in time BA/AA will want to once again apply for US antirtrust immunity. Again slots and landing rights for other US carriers will be an issue. AA has US antitrust immunity with both Finnair and Swiss. Both Finland and Switzerland have openskies with the US. Get the picture?

User currently offlineMarara From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 678 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3119 times:

Does anyone know who is leading Oneworld at the moment? I think it is Aerlingus or Lan isnt it?


I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. Jerome K Jerome
User currently offline747firstclass From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3128 times:

I would say AA.based on some reading between the lines that I have done.

User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5569 posts, RR: 36
Reply 7, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3093 times:

Marara, I am not sure, is this a joke?? The leading airlines of Oneworld are: AA and BA.

User currently offlineSwissgabe From Switzerland, joined Jan 2000, 5266 posts, RR: 33
Reply 8, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 3044 times:

747firstclass got the point. I could imagine that AA wants pushing BA to let join another strong carrier in Europe (if possible one based in a country were USA has and openskies agreement). Optimal would be a airline based in Central Europe.
The possibility that Swiss could join OneWorld are much higher when BA and AA still don't get the US antirtrust immunity and even if they would get it, I don't think that AA would be able (or willing) to feed all passengers through LHR only. Swiss has to offer excellent connections to African, Middle East and European Destinations.

Where does AA arrive at LHR, which terminal? Whats the minimum connecting time from this terminal to the one with European flights.

Why are CX and QF not that strong in the OneWorld alliance as BA and CX?



Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
User currently offlineMarara From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 678 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2992 times:

No, not joking, the OW members used to take turns at leading the alliance (dunno if they still do). I guessed it was one of those two because the last (?)meeting was in Ireland and the next one is in Santiago.


I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. Jerome K Jerome
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2951 times:

Perhaps KL/Co/NWA is in the picture again. I heard Bouw knows some people there .. At least then he doesn't have to talk to 13 airlines ...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © PixAir




User currently offlineSwissgabe From Switzerland, joined Jan 2000, 5266 posts, RR: 33
Reply 11, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2920 times:

So I could dream about MAS more often at ZRH again  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

But I personally don't think to that Swiss would go once again into direction KL or NW at all...



Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
User currently offlineJAL From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 5093 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2923 times:

I hope that all parties involved in the negotiations can resolve their differences so that Swiss can join OneWorld. With rival Star growing bigger and stronger, OneWorld desperately needs a new member to better compete.


Work Hard But Play Harder
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2885 times:

Bigger is not automatically stronger ...

E.g. every airline within Skyteam would have been gone without its governments except Delta (?).

-1 + -1 + -1 = -3 not +3 ....

Better strong & stable in a few markets then proudly spanning the world and going bust .. (Ask SN, SR, MH, ...)



User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2877 times:

I think it turns out that OW's biggest asset- BA's LHR hub is also it's biggest liability from a regulatory perspective. It is so big and so important as an international destination and transit point that the OW alliance as envisioned by the members is viewed as anticompetitve by regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. What a weird dilemma for BA. When push comes to shove, BA will not give up (too many) slots at LHR. It would not be smart.

User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2853 times:

It makes me quite sad to think that LHR, a truly global airport, suffers from so many problems.

As those who have used LHR will know, the airport terminals can become EXTREMELY congested, even T4, probably the most user-friendly terminal at LHR, used by BA/QF/UL/KL and maybe some others....

AA uses Terminal 3, the non-BA terminal for intercontinental airlines. (Terminal 2 is Euro airlines, T1 is domestic flights--although there are some exceptions).

LHR only has two big r/w's and desperately needs to expand if it is to continue to compete with CDG, FRA, AMS, MUC etc.

Unfortunately, the UK has some very complex and silly planning regulations which make it very difficult to actually get any kind of expansion or runways even proposed!! Politics is also, as ever, involved.

Bermuda-god, I'm soooooo fed up with this stupid rule. LIBERALIZE!!!!!! Both of you!!!

Hope SWISS joins OW, from what I've heard they are a quality airline!

Ciao



User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2849 times:

The British government and citizenry really needs to sit and think about LHR. It is ridiculous for people to move near an airport and then complain about the noise. I wish there were more environmentalists on this forum to give that side of the story. But from what little I have heard from them, their position is absurd. The lost economic value from preventing LHR expansion is huge.

User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (12 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2849 times:

I totally agree, an expanded LHR would benefit the country tremendously.....in all sorts of ways.

I'm not sure how built-up the area around the airport is though.....I guess that has to be taken into consideration...I wonder how CDG, AMS etc. managed.

The Env lobby in this country is significantly large, and there's votes to think about.....where's the lady with the handbag when you need her?.....  Sad

Regards


User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5485 posts, RR: 15
Reply 18, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2771 times:

As for the leader in Oneworld, I would give honors to either British Airways or Qantas. American definately has its opinions heard, but British Airways or Qantas are probably the leader for the following reasons:

-BA is loaded with slots at LHR, which is probably the central hub for the alliance.
-QF has immunity with just about every Oneworld member.

Regarding SWISS, I think they will join. First of all, Zurich could ease congestion at LHR and would be a good alternate to ease congestion there and move some of the Oneworld operations over to to ZRH. I am pretty sure that American wants SWISS in that alliance mainly for the fact that they(and Oneworld) can have a presence in Central Europe. Also, AA/BA did got get anti-trust immunity, so American needs another European partner to make up for it.

From Oneworld's standpoint, I think it needs to be known that there is a Star Alliance lounge in ZRH, and if SWISS does decide to give Oneworld the green light, I am sure Star might have second thoughts on that lounge given the fact that ZRH would become dominated by Oneworld.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5373 posts, RR: 24
Reply 19, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2767 times:

It is ridiculous for people to move near an airport and then complain about the noise. I wish there were more environmentalists on this forum to give that side of the story. But from what little I have heard from them, their position is absurd. The lost economic value from preventing LHR expansion is huge.

I wrote an Environmental politics seminar paper on this so maybe I can shed some light on this subject. As I saw it, the whole thing is, more or less, a double-edged sword. If LHR does not, for example, build T5 they stand to lose a significant amount of revenue to Continental airports which are far less hemmed in. BAA/BA have promised that they will build T5 and not a thrid runway.

For their part, enviromentalists (especially the West London Friends of The Earth) don't buy into BAA/BAs line. They say that the history of LHR is one of broken promises. Therefore, they are convinced that construction will not end with T5. Rather, they are convinced that a 3rd runway will follow in short order succeeded by a sixth terminal. Furthermore, they argue that because West London is now one of the most congested areas of London that building T5 will only excacerbate the situation. Moreover, they argue that the Perry Oaks Site (the site on which the proposed terminal will be built) which acts as a wildlife refuge, the Twin Rivers, and the Colne River Valley are all far too important to Britain to be destroyed in order to bring about T5 construction as well as the widening of the M4. Finally, they argue that, because the airport has already surpassed the number of aircraft movements that BAA claimed LHR would be at in 2008 with the opening of T5, this is a clear indication of the fact that BAA and BA have no interest in curbing the number of flights at the airport. Thus, they argue that flight movements will continue to increase affecting local noise pollution, air pollution, and water pollution.

This is a very, very abbreviated version of the problem. My paper was roughly 27 pages long and IIRC the governments report on the matter was some 1000 pages long. There's no clear answer to the problem. The only clear thing in this whole mess is that both sides have compelling arguments to back up their position.



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlineUal777contrail From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2721 times:

i bet swiss finally came to their senses, and realized that oneworld sucks.
and wished they could join the STAR.


ual 777 contrail


User currently offlineSwissgabe From Switzerland, joined Jan 2000, 5266 posts, RR: 33
Reply 21, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2649 times:

Well, if Swiss could replace LH they might think about joining STAR  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

But I don't think at all, it isn't the question if Oneworld sucks or not, its just the better solution for them iso to go into a Group where you find LH, OS, NG etc., there would be simply no place for Swiss at all.



Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5485 posts, RR: 15
Reply 22, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2621 times:

Ual777contrail-
If SWISS really wanted to join STAR, why didn't they hook up with United?  Insane

The issue is not Star vs. Oneworld or how/why Oneworld sucks. It is about SWISS and their decision. That comment by you was pretty useless if you ask me.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2589 times:

I wonder what role Swiss see for themselves in those alliances.

That will probably determine which one they join.


User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2551 times:

Thanks for the info OA412. Environmentalists typically reject all forms of cost/benefit analysis on the grounds that assigning monetary 'values' to clear air or clean water is unacceptable. Is that also the case with West London people?

User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5485 posts, RR: 15
Reply 25, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2535 times:

Keesje-
I would think that Swiss would find itself better in Oneworld. STAR already has a large central-european network and Skyteam already has a little bit of one.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Skyteam <u>MAY</u> Be In Talks With BA posted Mon Oct 23 2000 01:31:58 by EVA744
BA / Swiss Alliance Near To Collapse posted Wed Jun 2 2004 23:37:57 by Singapore_Air
Swiss To Soon Join OneWorld Alliance posted Sun Aug 10 2003 21:01:03 by Elal106
NW Says Alliance With KLM May Come To An End posted Thu Aug 7 2003 04:38:41 by Floris
US Airways May Create Alliance With United (sure.) posted Thu Jun 27 2002 15:38:29 by Keesje
BA In Talks With SKYTEAM, Oneworld Breaking Up posted Thu Oct 26 2000 21:59:59 by Aer Lingus
Alaska Gets In Trouble With FAA (may Be Suspended) posted Fri Jun 2 2000 19:03:43 by Acvitale
Looks Like The Old Paradigm May Be Broken With AWA posted Sun Feb 27 2000 04:31:38 by FrontierMan
AN-124's-More May Be On The Way posted Thu Jan 4 2007 07:36:27 by Tugger
Air Madrid Crews May Be Fleeing posted Wed Jan 3 2007 22:38:18 by Emptyarm