Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Comparing BA And AA  
User currently offlineB737-700 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1340 times:


Hello,

when flying via Heathrow to the US on Oneworld you can either fly on BA or AA to many destinations.
Now that AA has more room throughout coach, it seems very logical to fly on AA and not on BA. Anyone agrees ?
Or is BA service a lot better ? What would you choose and why, please ?

Do all BA 747s and 777s have PTVs ? And how about AA 767s ?

Thank you.

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyboy36y From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3039 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1332 times:

AA will not grant miles on BA flights that are transatlantic. I think BA will not either.

User currently offlineB737-700 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1325 times:


Ohh, that sounds strange.


User currently offlineFlyboy36y From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3039 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1319 times:

Go on the AA website and look up mileage partners. Click on BA and read what it says. It clearly says (sadly) you don't get miles on transatlantic BA flights. I think this is because most people would chose BA and it is not fair to AA. AA offers enough flights that it does not hurt the customer to not have a choice.

User currently offlineJ-bird From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 109 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1310 times:

Having done both flights lately, I would make the following observations:

1. AA more room in coach is definitely worth it in my opinion - at least if you're relatively tall like me. You really feel better on arrival - less cramped and sore relative to BA;

2. Inflight entertainment seemed slightly better on AA- more variety, turned on sooner;

3. Service standards were about the same on both carriers in economy - relatively pleasant crews, decent food, on-time departures/arrivals.

So, to sum up, AA pulls ahead basically on the leg-room. As for the mileage bit, I have no real comment as I collect on JAL currently, although I am contemplating a switch to BA's program.

Hope that helps.

Cheers.


User currently offlineTurbineBeaver From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 1199 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1302 times:

No way BA/AA!

[filler]


User currently offlineBkkair From Thailand, joined Aug 2001, 409 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1284 times:

Flyboy36y, not granting mileage AA/BA and vv. has nothing to do with people choosing BA over AA( although they probably would). It has to do with the US/UK governments not agreeing to let AA/BA cooperate more closely. ( eg. Open Skies and BA/AA not giving up enought slots at LHR).

BA/AA would sorely like to offer mileage and code shares on eachothers services transatlantic.


User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1279 times:

With respect to Economy class travel, although I've only flown AA domestic, from what I have read and heard, I wouldn't say there is much difference in flying AA or BA across the pond (I've only used BA to the US because they offer student fares, AA don't....)

In the premium market, I think BA are trying to pull ahead with their flat-bed concept, whereas AA hasn't yet got round to revamping the J section yet; in First class, I think BA probably still rules, at least in this region.

Just my thoughts.

Regards


User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5482 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1245 times:

Domestically, I must admit that Club Europe is nicer than MRTC. The seat is leather and there is a little bit more legroom, but this is only on I think intra-UK flights.

Transatlantic, it has been awhile since I flew BA transatlantic(they were still flying the DC-10s!). I admit though, that American surprised me. If you think AA sucks domestically, take a long haul with them, that should change your mind.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1244 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Depends on what u want really. BA flies 744's/777's and 767's over the altantic versus AA's 777's/767's. BA's 744's and 777's have PTV's in all classes while AA has PTV's in the 777's only. the 767 don't. Although i gues AA's MRTC is very tempting, legroom is important to pax these days. With BA you are guaranteed at least decent service, if not, excellent service. But i'd say whichever carrier you choose, you'll get good service.

Arsenal@LHR



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineB737-700 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1240 times:


Thanks for your opinions !


User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5482 posts, RR: 15
Reply 11, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1202 times:

The AA 767s may not have PTV's, but I would still recommend them. They offer good comfort and the engines are pretty quiet after take off, and this is someone who has sat right behind the wing and right over the engines!

It's a really tough choice. I'd say either way, you will win. In a tough decision like this, go with the cheaper price.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineTimeForFlight From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 267 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1192 times:

Foretting what BA and AA did to VS years ago, I will tell you now to take any British carrier over a US carrier when possible. The simple reason is that US carriers are more concerned with profiting while British carriers are more concerned with customer satisfaction. VS, for example, offers "goody bags" where customers get free "socks," eye covers, pen and notepad, etc. I can't remember what BA offered ahead of the US competition but my flight from ATL-LGW on them a few years back was much more enjoyable then on any US carrier. AA isn't a bad airline. More Room Throughout Coach is a nice amenity, but, as an American, I find nothing worse than putting up with Americans while travelling internationally. The British are quieter, kinder, and more willing while Americans are, well, American... Not an insult to my fellow Americans out there, just a complement to my fellow British citizens out there (I'm a dual citizen...).  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5482 posts, RR: 15
Reply 13, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1143 times:

TimeForFlight-
I have flown AA business class and we got amenity kits. In AA economy, you do not get them. With BA and VS, you might. It has been awhile since I flew BA overseas.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineFlyboy36y From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3039 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1140 times:

Bkkair, thank you for telling be about the real reason miles are not granted. I made an assumption.  Smile

User currently offlineDLMCO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1110 times:

I've never flown AA long-haul, but having recently flown BA in World Traveller from JFK to LHR, I must say that BA has the finest economy product of anyone I've ever flown on. Hands down, better than AF, AZ, DL, or US across the pond...

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA And AA To Possibly Merge...& BA A380's? posted Sun Oct 9 2005 07:48:54 by Jacobin777
Comparing BA's GE 777s And RR 777s. posted Fri Feb 14 2003 02:15:36 by CX747
Oneworld And AA/BA posted Tue Mar 7 2000 17:22:34 by Eg777er
BA And 'the Cross'........ posted Fri Nov 24 2006 18:00:38 by BAStew
BA And SQ Vie For SUs Lapsed 787 Slots posted Thu Nov 9 2006 10:08:15 by PanAm_DC10
OneWorld At JFK And AA's New Terminal posted Wed Nov 8 2006 20:22:20 by NYC-AIR
BA And Helsinki posted Mon Oct 30 2006 02:10:38 by CXA330300
Efficiency Of BA And CX - OneWorld Alliance posted Mon Oct 9 2006 16:58:33 by DernierVirage
BA And IB To Start Gibraltar-Spain Routes! posted Mon Sep 4 2006 12:29:49 by AIR MALTA
BA And SOU.. posted Wed Jul 26 2006 22:16:44 by Soudave