Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA Nicknamed "Boeing Airways" At Airbus?  
User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2863 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Is it true that BA was once nicknamed "Boeing airways" by some folks at Airbus due to BA's reluctance to buy from Boeing?

Rdgs
Arsenal@LHR


In Arsene we trust!!
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineVC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3702 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2815 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

BA & it's predessor BOAC have been Boeing Airways since 1956

User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2808 times:

It was Boeing Allways, and it was a general term. With 737s 757s 767s 747s and involvement with the 777 everyone thought that BA would always stay Boeing.

User currently offlineNightcruiser From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2743 times:

But now I think British Airways operates A319's and A320's. Nevertheless, BA operates an overwhelmingly Boeing fleet.

User currently onlineCrosswind From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 2601 posts, RR: 58
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2718 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yep,
BA definitely were Boeing Airways!

One of the most stark examples being;
They took delivery of 10 A320s from an order they inherited with B.Cal in 1988-1990. They obviously liked the A320, or I doubt they would have kept such a small fleet of 10, especially when early demand for the A320 meant there would have been many airlines willing to take almost new aircraft rather than wait for a delivery slot. However, they remained "Boeing Airways" and ordered the B737-400 as part of their short-haul fleet renewal soon after the A320 entered service. So the 2 types with near identical capacities have operated side-by-side ever since. It was 10 years after service introduction of the A320 before BA ordered an Airbus by choice!

Regards
CROSSWIND


User currently offlineElal106 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 975 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2673 times:

ELAL and Southwest - BoeingAirways!!!!!!
Qantas and United are defectors!


fly boeing!!!!!
cheers
elal106


User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2665 times:

That mean we can call it US Air-BUS-ways?



User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2666 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

That tag must now go away i'd say, BA has zillions of A320/A319/A321's now. With the 757/767's disappearing, a airbus short haul fleet is the norm for BA now.

Arsenal@LHR



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 8, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2661 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

That mean we can call it US Air-BUS-ways?

Indeed we can.

Arsenal@LHR



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 9, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2652 times:

BA's early (ex BCal) A320s were not as sought after as suggested above, because they are very early build -100 series aircraft (no winglets for one thing) and the -200 appeared quite soon after the -100. If BA had got early deliveries of A320-200s they would have had a much higher resale value.

PS El Al tried to defect (a la BA and United) by ordering A330s, but no way was the US State Dept going to tolerate such ingratitude.



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently onlineCrosswind From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 2601 posts, RR: 58
Reply 10, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2630 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Cedarjet,
Yes, BA's first 5 A320s are series 100s. I still don't think BA would have had too much trouble finding a buyer for the aircraft, around the time of delivery. Being "very early build" machines doesn't really matter when the aircraft is 6 months old and it's the most advanced airliner flying!

I take your point about the A320-100 now though when they're 12 years old, I always wondered whether BA would strike a deal to sell 'em to Air France who already operate 12 A320-100s, maybe now they will once more V2500-powered A320s arrive.

In a similar vein, I doubt anyone will be falling over themselves to take the 2 non-ER B777-200s that BA have just returned to Boeing. They may have been of interest to Asian airlines like Cathay/Malaysian as range is not an issue on their trunk routes, but their GE90 engines mean these airlines are unlikely to be interested.

Only 2 potential customers spring to mind;
China Southern and JAL, who've switched from PW to GE for recent 777 orders.

Regards
CROSSWIND


User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2500 times:

Is there a chance the GE90 ex BA772s could be re-engined?Cathy took the 1st 777 I believe not too long ago ofr intra-Asian flying

User currently offlineEE-Kay From Ireland, joined Nov 2001, 152 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2432 times:

Does KLM also qualify for "Boeing Airways"? Maybe not, if they get the A330 (and they had the A310 in the past).

User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 13, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2423 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Delta also qualifies as "Boeing airways"



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlinePH-BFA From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 562 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2418 times:

KLM was a Douglas customer. They operated almost every type: DC 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 and MD-11.

PH-BFA


User currently offlineRichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3756 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2412 times:

Delta does not qualify as "Boeing Airways" because the letters B and A do not appear in "Delta".

American Airlines would qualify as "Airbus Airways" if it had a preference for Airbus aircraft, but it doesn't, so it isn't.


User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 33
Reply 16, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2409 times:

Did those early BA A320 actually fly for BCal or were they delivered straight to BA? I´m just wondering whether there were 3 or 4 -100 operators.
Daniel Smile


User currently offlineScorpio From Belgium, joined Oct 2001, 5040 posts, RR: 44
Reply 17, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2354 times:

The A320-100s were delivered straight to British Airways I believe.

User currently onlineCrosswind From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 2601 posts, RR: 58
Reply 18, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2356 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The A320-100 never flew for B.Cal, but the first aircraft was delivered in full B.Cal colours and had to be repainted before service entry.

Here is the only photo I could find on the net;


If anyone knows of any others, please post a link!

Regards
CROSSWIND


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8025 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2255 times:

What's interesting is that British Airways could have been a big Airbus customer earlier had the British government not stupidly bowed out of the Airbus Industrie consortium in 1969.

If the British had continued to support Airbus back then it would have been very likely that British Airways would have ended up buying 30-35 A300B4's powered by RB.211-524 engines for European operations instead of buying Lockheed L1011's, and very likely would have been among the very first customers for what became the A320.


User currently offlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1316 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2167 times:

Well before they purchased the A320-family aircraft they could definitely be called 'Boeing Airways' but not anymore! It sounds kind of cool though.

Hkg82.


User currently offlineRickB From United Kingdom, joined May 2003, 243 posts, RR: 9
Reply 21, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2147 times:

RayChuang - your right about the British Government, but Airbus always had British interests as Hawker Siddeley where always involved.

RickB


User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 22, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2129 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It's not a bad thing being called boeing airways, i think it's OK, but time moves on and things eventually change. i.e. BA breaking the duck and buying airbus.

Arsenal@LHR



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineCharliecossie From Germany, joined Oct 2001, 479 posts, RR: 9
Reply 23, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2076 times:

Crosswind:
I think that picture is of the first A320 which was painted in BCal colours on one side and Air France on the other.
I was at Gatwick the day Busby (G-BUSB) arrived and it was in BA colours.


User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1866 posts, RR: 7
Reply 24, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2052 times:

Boeing Airways? Really? I didn't know Boeing also made the Concorde, VC-10, and L-1011.  Confused  Acting devilish

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8025 posts, RR: 5
Reply 25, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2013 times:

However, Hawker Siddeley continued its involvement with Airbus as a private venture without British government assistance, building the A300B wings. It was this venture that allowed the British to rejoin the Airbus consortium a number of years later.

If the British government had stayed with Airbus very likely sales of the Lockheed L1011 would have much lower, to say the least.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing Won't Imitate Airbus' "Symbolic" China FAL posted Tue Oct 31 2006 09:03:15 by Leelaw
"Major Screwup" At Airbus posted Sat Jul 1 2006 08:35:29 by NWDC10
Avianca "to Order" 42 Widebodies (Airbus/Boeing?) posted Sat Feb 4 2006 20:21:01 by Luisde8cd
Boeing And Airbus "Duopoly" posted Mon Feb 7 2005 21:34:32 by RootsAir
Airbus Unveils A380/Boeing Updates Its "Hupmobile" posted Thu Jan 20 2005 17:04:26 by Highflier92660
Boeing CEO: "Why Do (Airbus) Need Subsidies?" posted Fri Jul 2 2004 23:25:45 by Singapore_Air
Airbus Answer To New Boeing "787", posted Sun Dec 22 2002 01:40:18 by Keesje
Airbus CEO: US Giving Boeing "Marshall Plan" posted Thu Dec 13 2001 11:43:35 by Joni
"Belly-flop" Landing At FXE posted Sun Sep 17 2006 22:45:46 by Ksonderling
Boeing Is Not Gloating At Airbus' Problems posted Thu Jun 22 2006 14:43:15 by Leelaw
Boeing Create "New" Runway At LHR! posted Sun Sep 16 2007 11:13:24 by Readytotaxi
"Politics In Command At Airbus" - American Thinker posted Fri Mar 16 2007 22:21:55 by Lostmoon744
Boeing Won't Imitate Airbus' "Symbolic" China FAL posted Tue Oct 31 2006 09:03:15 by Leelaw
"Major Screwup" At Airbus posted Sat Jul 1 2006 08:35:29 by NWDC10
Avianca "to Order" 42 Widebodies (Airbus/Boeing?) posted Sat Feb 4 2006 20:21:01 by Luisde8cd
Boeing And Airbus "Duopoly" posted Mon Feb 7 2005 21:34:32 by RootsAir
Airbus Unveils A380/Boeing Updates Its "Hupmobile" posted Thu Jan 20 2005 17:04:26 by Highflier92660
Boeing CEO: "Why Do (Airbus) Need Subsidies?" posted Fri Jul 2 2004 23:25:45 by Singapore_Air
Airbus Answer To New Boeing "787", posted Sun Dec 22 2002 01:40:18 by Keesje