Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Michigan Pilot Criminal Background Checks Now Law  
User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6202 posts, RR: 12
Posted (12 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1004 times:

http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsitems/2002/020611memo.html

Check out the above link to AOPA information on a new Michigan law requiring ALL flight training students to undergo a criminal background check.

Do states have the authority to make such laws? In effect, they are altering FAA's minimum qualifications to become a pilot. Could states now pass laws saying that "one must be at least 21 years of age to operate aircraft in our state, and must be 25 to rent an aircraft" or "one must pass a more stringent vision test before being eligible for flight training"?

States, please leave pilot certification matters up to the feds. Thanks.


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline744rules From Belgium, joined Mar 2002, 407 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1000 times:

I think this is a stupid law. Who will stop potential hijackers of enlisting after they finished their flight training. In this case it is just a question of timing

User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6202 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 997 times:

The law makes reference to being "enrolled" in flight training. What actually constitutes being "enrolled". I did my flight training at a Part 141 school, without actually "enrolling" in the course. Would I have been subject to the criminal background check?

Wasted taxpayer's money! Hassle for everyone!! >>:-

BTW, how many of the 9/11 hijackers had criminal records? I doubt many; terrorists are trained to keep low profile until they strike.



Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29791 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 993 times:

This is a stupid law.

Has everyone in the lower 48 caught scared fever or what?

This is the type of behaviour you would expected from California.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineJimbobjoe From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 653 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 988 times:

Do states have the authority to make such laws?

Yes. There are two ways (that I can think of) to answer this question:

a.) states can make laws which exceed federal laws/regulations, as long as the feds have not passed a law specifically forbidding states from exceeding their regs/laws (and depending on the situation, the feds may not be able to do that)

b.) This law has to do with flight schools, and while there is also FAA oversight of flight schools (with regards to certified flight schools--those from which one can get an FAA license) flight schools are also schools, and education is in the state's domain, and while i wont' say "period" to that, states are pretty sovereign with what they can do with education.

BTW, how many of the 9/11 hijackers had criminal records?

I don't believe any of them did.

This is the type of behaviour you would expected from California.

Oh my...I love this quote; I couldn't agree more. A very bad law indeed. (Having watched a lot of laws at the state level, they are always hard to get rid of.) The fact that a CCW background check, which I suspect many pilots/pilots to be, have already been through, doesn't count, bugs me.

Actually, the state could have very well required a non-fingerprint background check, but I think that Michigan has gone fingerprint happy in recent times (see California) and I think that's a shame because MI used to be pretty sensitive about that sorta thing.



User currently offlineExnonrev From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 621 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (12 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 962 times:

I think AOPA has a good court case on this one. The FAA has sole authority for the qualifications, training, and licensing of pilots. The majority of flight schools are privately owned and not affiliated with any accredited public high school or university.

The only school in Michigan where they might be able to get away with this is WMU, which is a public university.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Aviation And Background Checks. posted Sat Mar 25 2006 03:08:44 by Flyboy80
Flight Schools & Background Checks... posted Fri Feb 1 2002 21:40:13 by Baec777
Background Checks posted Sat Jun 17 2000 15:01:07 by Beckaru
Over Lake Michigan NOW posted Thu Aug 19 2004 18:10:46 by ChiGB1973
The Pilot Of The Sious City Crash Now Needs You. posted Wed Dec 24 2003 04:06:58 by Mirrodie
Imagine Trying To Become A Commercial Pilot Now posted Sat Mar 22 2003 17:29:55 by Atcboy73
Iron Maiden Star Now British Airline Pilot posted Wed Oct 16 2002 22:21:41 by Capt.Picard
Be A KLM Pilot, NOW... Sorta. posted Thu Sep 5 2002 15:20:31 by Delta777
Laid Off Pilot Now Working At Home Depot posted Fri May 17 2002 14:20:15 by Layitontheline
Busiest Michigan Airports? posted Mon May 7 2007 01:52:01 by Falstaff