Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SAS Fleet Scheduling  
User currently offlineGodbless From Sweden, joined Apr 2000, 2753 posts, RR: 15
Posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1774 times:

Does anybody know how SAS plans to use their fleet most effectivly? Within Europe they use MD-80/90's, 737's and A321's and crewwise it doesn't seem to be to easy to switch from a 736 to a larger MD-80 or the A321 if demand would rise on a single flight.
Does SK have an extra high amount of crews on stand-by or do they strictly stick to the schedule and also use an A321 even if a 736 would justify the demand?

Do they also send widebodies from CPH to ARN or do they go the "long way" for example CPH-ORD-ARN?


5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineCPH-R From Denmark, joined May 2001, 6534 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1753 times:

This is my idea of it, I have no idea as to what SAS does:
The larger aircrafts are usually scheduled in the busy hours, that is in the morning and in the afternoon, where all the biz guys moves around Europe.

If a large group of people travels together, thus meaning that a larger aircraft has to be used, they will usually book well in advance, and so, the right aircraft an be assigned.

Also, the widebodies are used between ARN and CPH (and HEL for that matter), but mainly to train crew. When SAS first recieved their A340's, it would usually be scheduled on the shorter inter-nordic routes, thus allow the crew to have a large amount of cycles on their sheet.

User currently offlineSAS_A330-300 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1670 times:

Here's my view.


- 600s is used almost everywhere in the SAS network.
- 700s is rarely used outside Norway.
- 800s is rarely used outside Sweden.


- 81/82/83s is used like the 737-600 but as a bigger aircraft.
- 87s is mostly used on low-yield routes.
- 90s is used particularly on heavy routes CPH/ARN/OSL/GOT to LHR/FRA/AMS/CDG etc.

A321s - flies only on heavy routes like the MD-90 but as a bigger aircraft.

B767/A340s - on longhaul routes.

I'm sorry, but you have to ask someone inside SAS to have a more detailed look.

Regards, Simon

User currently offlineGodbless From Sweden, joined Apr 2000, 2753 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1605 times:

Thank you for your replies.

After all I hope that I will end up on a A321 and 737 when I fly ARN-CPH-ARN in July...


User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3813 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1581 times:

From what I can surmise from browsing current SAS short to medium haul schedules, aircraft type assigments seem to follow the pattern typically seen at other European airlines who have significant domestic networks as well as an extensive network covering other cities in Europe (AF, AZ, BA, IB, and LH come to mind in addition to SK). In general, it seems that the larger aircraft in the fleets of such airlines are concentrated on their domestic networks while the smaller types are typically assigned primarily to international services that tend, overall, to generate less traffic than their domestic routes.

At least some of the 737-800s of SAS were delivered in an all-coach seating configuration with domestic routes in mind. From their current timetable, it is evident that 737-600, MD80, MD87 and MD90 types remain the workhorses of SK's network to European points outside of Scandinavia while the 737-700/800 types (along with MD80s) serve many of the domestic services within the three countries represented by SAS while the A321s are especially found on CPH-ARN/OSL services.

There are, of course, exceptions to the rule. During a recent trip to the FRA Visitors Terrace I saw the following aircraft of SAS within a 4 hour time period: Dash 8 Q400, MD80, MD90, 737-800, and A321. The reason for such unusual variety may be the Star Alliance partnership between SK and LH which makes FRA a virtual second European/intercontinental hub for SAS.

User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4421 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1575 times:

I will be flying SAS (my first time) in early September from Dulles to CPH aboard a 767-300. Would have liked to fly the A340 from Newark, but the air fare from EWR was more expensive. Wish the A340 was used IAD-CPH.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
SAS Fleet History posted Sat Feb 12 2005 22:04:54 by Ramprat74
SAS Fleet Plans!?! posted Fri May 10 2002 22:19:15 by Dash8Driver
SAS Fleet Details posted Wed May 16 2001 14:48:52 by TR
SAS Fleet Plans posted Mon Feb 21 2000 13:24:14 by Kaitak
SAS - Do They Own Their Fleet? posted Fri Jul 28 2006 14:12:10 by CHRISBA777ER
SAS Long-haul Fleet Utilization posted Sat Feb 11 2006 00:15:22 by Scalebuilder
SAS Braathens Fleet - Why Swedish/Danish-register? posted Wed Oct 26 2005 18:40:51 by Mozart
Latest On SAS Widebody Fleet posted Wed Jul 27 2005 06:44:59 by Flybynight
SAS - Sack The Fleet Managers! posted Sun Mar 6 2005 22:54:25 by SAA-SAL
Question On SAS 737 Fleet/destinations posted Thu Feb 5 2004 23:06:49 by Mozart