Jessman From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1506 posts, RR: 7 Posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2600 times:
At work today we were discussing smoking lounges at airports. Like how Atlanta has smoking aquariums, you might be able to see feet through the windows if you look low enough. Norfolk has them out by the gates. DFW, MSP and Salt Lake City have them I know for certain, but when I looked for information about ours here in Cincinnati I found these news articles. http://www.kypost.com/news/1998/smoke022798.html
a brief synopsis; anti smoking activists say that smoking lounges at Cincinnati violated civil liberties because people with disabilities may be exposed to second hand smoke.
So my question is why did they go after CVG airport and Delta Air Lines specifically when so many airports make smoking lounges for their customers.
Also, what do you think about this.
I did a brief search to see if this had been discussed before, but I didn't come up with anything; I know this is kinda old, but it's new for me
Rai From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2540 times:
I think you can smoke in LGA's bars. I'm not sure how it goes at JFK or EWR. I know YYZ has a smoking lounge in the Canadian departures section T2. YEG also has a small smoking lounge. LHR has a small one in T3.
Sabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2484 times:
Here in Germany is every airport smoking free but you can smoke at the bars while having a drink.
A big surprise was Milan (MXP) for me, the complete airport is a non-smoking zone.
At Paris (CDG) you can smoke wherever you want, I have done it several times and nobody cares.
At some terminal at LAX (maybe terminal 4? I departed from there with National Airlines) is the best smoking lounge, it is outside from where you have a perfect view on the ramp. Ridiculous is that there is no smoking lounge in the Tom Bradley International terminal, I want to smoke a cigarette before my departure to Paris (11 hours flight time) but there was no opportunity to do that, so I had to go outside.
United_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7571 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2464 times:
I know LAX has one near UA's gates. It is outside the walkway to the next concourse. It has bars around the top,there is no roof to it. It was funny to see people who couldn't smoke for like 6 hours from Hawaii walking very quickly to it.
I was considerung trying to get some ramp pics,but there was always too many people in there.
'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
Srbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 10 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2417 times:
Honestly, no matter how hard the anti-smoking crusaders try, they'll never get what they want. There is an option for those that do not want to breath second-hand smoke, MOVE away from the smokers. It's getting to the point that the only place you can smoke is in you house, doors locked and under the covers (to paraphrase Denis Leary). The "aquarium" rooms you can smell before you even see them. I'm not a cigarette smoker (although I do smoke the weekly cigar, and my pipe gets a good workout as well [tobacco pipe, not hash pipe thank you very much.]) but am used to being around smokers, so it doesn't bother me. If it gets to bothering me, I move to a spot where it doesn't bother me as much. Two things are fuelling air rage, alcohol, and nicotine addictions. You wonder why so many of these smoking lounges are always full? Because some of these folks are getting ready to spend several hours without being able to smoke. Have you ever noticed how quick the smokers get off the plane so they can grab a quick puff before moving on to the terminal or their next flight? Suing the airlines and the airports for second hand smoke from the lounges is kind of like these cities that are suing gun makers for making guns that end up killing people. A great solution to the gun problem is not to limit guns, just make the bullets more expensive, I mean make a box of bullets cost $250, and that'll cut down on gun violence. So all of you whiny anti-smoking crusaders can just put your lips on a tailpipe and suck exhaust! If someone wants to smoke, let them. They know it's dangerous, even if they don't read the SG's warning. Suits against the tobacco companies for health problems related to smoking should be thrown out, just as most lawsuits against beer and liquor companies have. People know the risks going in, so whatever happened to them is their own damn fault. All it really is is that people don't want to take responsibility for their own actions and the consequences of those actions.