Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
USAirways Defers Payments On Older Aircraft  
User currently offlineFlashmeister From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2903 posts, RR: 6
Posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1404 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Press release at http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/020624/dcm045_1.html.

Excerpts from the release:

The payment deferrals are focused principally on aircraft lessors and lenders, all of which have been notified, including aircraft that have already been grounded and selected older Boeing aircraft in service that have been targeted as part of the restructuring plan.

The Company said that the payment deferrals do not involve any public debt obligations or payments related to its Airbus aircraft fleet, all of which are current and which the Company presently intends to continue to pay in the ordinary course of business.

The Company said that it was otherwise paying its day-to-day obligations and did not anticipate any impact to its customers, employees, airports or other operations. The Company also said that the strategic lessor/lender and vendor payment deferral initiatives were not linked to the Company's current cash position.

The Company acknowledged the possibility that it may receive notices of default which could eventually lead to cross-defaults under agreements with other lessors, vendors and creditors. Such cross-defaults could lead to an acceleration of payment demands by the Company's creditors, which if not rescinded, could require the Company to implement its restructuring plan though a Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization.

-----

Not good news from Crystal City. I can't see how anyone at US could feel good about this. First, ask for a loan, then ask to delay paying off earlier loans... sounds like they don't intend on making money for a very long time.

How many other people would be allowed to run up their credit cards to the limits, get a bank-guaranteed loan, and then stop paying some of their oldest bills? Precious few...

Anyone care to hum along with me as we watch more deck-chair arranging on the Titanic of the skies?

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4514 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1376 times:

US Airways should *not* be granted a federally-guaranteed loan. Market forces should be allowed to break US up among the other Cartel carriers when it goes under. Industry economics and DOJ have ensured that it will be a breakup and not a megamerger.

Every time I drive by DCA and see a yellow Midway Airlines tail (a big 73G), it annoys me, because they were not a viable business before 9/11, and will probably wind up shuttered again before too long. Your tax dollars at work.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineCO/ba From United States of America, joined May 2001, 399 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1360 times:

US will not get the gurantees

User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 3861 posts, RR: 34
Reply 3, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1305 times:

This thread over at USAviaion.com doesn't bode well for US Airways, either.

LoneStarMike

User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1294 times:

Dave Siegel took a big bit of s$!t sandwich when he accepted the USAirways job. I'm curious what he thinks will actually happen here.

User currently offlineOuboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4612 posts, RR: 23
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1260 times:

If you read the discussion on USAviation, you will notice the aircraft in question here are the F-100s and 767s. The F-100s are no longer flying and are just collecting dust in the desert; the 767s are still being used...however, this is the widebody fleet type that they want to eliminate. Unlike those before who would think that the 330s were going, sorry the 76s are goners.

This is all positioning to make the reorganization work. Nothing more...nothing less. U will get the loan and will be a viable stand alone carrier with a partner in a domestic alliance -- Northwest along with KLM.


User currently offlineFlashmeister From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2903 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1255 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Interesting about the engines/tail# matchups that are in progress, although I agree that this is just prudent preparation...

But that signals that people in Crystal City know that they have to prepare for this, and it doesn't sound like they're wasting any time with it. How big of a hit would it be to US operations if they parked the 73x fleet? I'm not as up on their fleet as I used to be...

-Aaron


User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1229 times:


Here is the iceberg:

http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/020625/200206251408000574_1.html


User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 8, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1217 times:

Dave Siegel took a big bit of s$!t sandwich when he accepted the USAirways job. I'm curious what he thinks will actually happen here
Lol,I like that!What is Siegel's record in previous jobs?What is US'debt?


User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1196 times:

Dave Siegel was president of Continental Express and then CEO of Avis Rent-a-Car. He was held in high regard at CoEX. I know someone who works there. CoEX has done pretty well. I don't how he did at Avis.

User currently offlineOuboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4612 posts, RR: 23
Reply 10, posted (12 years 5 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 1116 times:

If a lawsuit over 3 old MD-80s is an iceberg...U has nothing to worry about.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Gov't Considers Placing Cap On Older Aircraft posted Wed Apr 19 2006 18:09:17 by ZChannel
'Threatening' Note Found On TCX aircraft posted Tue Aug 22 2006 16:46:00 by Mhodgson
Japan And France To Work On Supersonic Aircraft posted Sun Jul 23 2006 15:34:10 by TWOne
Smoke On Spanair Aircraft posted Thu Jul 13 2006 02:47:54 by Estick
Question On Delta Aircraft With Refurb Interior posted Thu Jun 22 2006 14:34:57 by 1337Delta764
Largest Bins On A Narrowbody Aircraft posted Wed Jun 21 2006 21:07:28 by 1337Delta764
IFE Manufacturers On Delta's Aircraft posted Thu Jun 8 2006 17:46:56 by 1337Delta764
Update On TK Aircraft Deliveries posted Tue Jun 6 2006 21:30:24 by Pilotaydin
777-style Windows On Other Aircraft posted Fri May 19 2006 21:57:37 by 1337Delta764
New Interiors On Delta Aircraft - Any Updates? posted Sun Apr 23 2006 21:51:37 by 1337Delta764