Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Southwest To Order 737-800's Come Fall...  
User currently offlineSJCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 579 posts, RR: 1
Posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3148 times:

Not personally confirmed, but heard from a very reliable source at the station that we will be ordering somewhere around 8 737-800's come fall 2002. If memory serves, they will be configured to seat somewhere around 189(??). They will be used for the soon to be LAX-BWI nonstops, and more transcontinental flights from SEA and other west coast cities. Per Colleen Barrett at the PHX "Message to the Field" last winter, Southwest will be "evolving" slowly into a long haul carrier. I will find out more at work tomorrow.

Apologize if this topic has been discussed, I searched but found nothing...

SJCguy  Smile

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBlatantEcho From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1896 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3117 times:

It has constantly been said that they wouldn't take 738s, as they require a 4th FA, but seems like they are bent on an evolution.

Wonder how it will dig into their flexability and efficency.

Interesting times idead.



They're not handing trophies out today
User currently offlineSJCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 579 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3113 times:

Per Colleen, we are in the process of hiring 7,000+ employees, including about 1,000 flight attendants...the extra 8 for the first -800's, I don't believe, will pose problem.  Smile

SJCguy


User currently offlineBrons2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2991 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3102 times:

The 737 cannot accomodate more than 189 due to lack of emergency exits.

a long haul carrier eh? wonder what herb thinks?



Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6260 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3097 times:

Southwest will never stick with only 8 of a series. If this rumor is true, WN will order many more. Time will tell though.


Is grammar no longer taught is schools? Saying "me and her" or some such implies illiteracy.
User currently offlineSJCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 579 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3050 times:

Starting out with 8 of the type is what I should have said...yes, most likely will order more...

SJCguy


User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16228 posts, RR: 57
Reply 6, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3017 times:

I imagine as slots become harder to come by, particularly at LAX later decade, that the 738 (or something larger) will become a necessity to facilitate revenue growth.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2998 times:

In another thread, BarneyCaptain said that Southwest's 727's (yes, they did have them once) had 149 pax w/ 3 flight attendants and the pax loved them. Perhaps with the 800's economics and commonality they could have better luck with larger A/C this time around.

A few questions - assuming 149 pax, how much extra fuel and acquisition cost are we talking about here, compared to the -700? Would the extra cargo revenue and passenger appeal offset this? I would guess that there would be virtually no extra maintenance and staffing expense.


Another weird idea - suppose you go with 3-2 seating instead of 3-3. You end up with 157-8 seats, assuming the same seat pitch. Take out 2-3 rows to get down to 149 - this allows you to still increase seat pitch a bit. Can anyone calculate how much? Im to lazy for this one....
Anyway, this would give a far superior product to most competitors on the transcon market. Your chances of getting a middle seat are slim, the seat pitch may still become competitive with American's (34' - SW's current figure - is already pretty good), and you get a first-class width seat.

My guess is that if they do this new type of long haul service, it would be for 3 main reasons The first is to be prepared for when JB grows up. The second is to have a hedge against a decline in their primary business. The third is to capitalize on a new expanision oportunity that requires no new stations. All this for little sacrifice in commonality of equipment and training. I can certainly see the attraction.



User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2928 times:

The 737-800 only holds 189 in all Y, 31" pitch. WN wuold need the 737-900 to do 189 pax. But the 737-90wuoldn't be able t do eastbound transcon, especially in winter. Of course, it's not proven that WN is going to make transcnos a key part of their route structure.Steve

User currently offlineSEA nw DC10 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 491 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2819 times:

Awesome!! I'm glad to see Southwest starting more long hauls, and the 738 will be a perfect addition to the fleet...well done.

SEA nw DC10


User currently offlineSjc>sfo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2803 times:

SJCguy-

From what you know, is Southwest dedicating the -800s specifically to transcon duty?


User currently offlineSJCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 579 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2766 times:

Yes, that's what I was told. The first 8 are going to be designated for the SEA-MDW, LAX-BWI, and soon to be SJC-MSY/HOU (if those transpire).

SJCguy


User currently offlineInvicta From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 58 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2710 times:

I can see why Southwest would change their business model right now, there are lots of opportunities out there. Underserved markets, weak competion and airport space. The big full service airlines have scaled back and opened up markets for others to take advantage. They can't afford to take advantage of the situation. Southwest is one of the few companies that can. Southwest management seems pretty sharp, I would think it's worth a little risk for them because if it works the full service companies won't want to fight Southwest to win back those routes when times get better.

User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2696 times:

I'm a Southwest fan...

but just like everything else in aviation..... I'll believe it when I see it.


User currently offlineSjc>sfo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2639 times:

SJC-MSY? wow, I'd be impressed to see that make money... though I'm afraid southwest is steering away from what has been successful for years. It's not like there aren't anymore short stage-length routes that need SW service.

User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4466 posts, RR: 34
Reply 15, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2581 times:

JetBlue seats 162 in A320's, which must require a 4th f/a, and their profits speak for themselves. Perhaps WN is deciding that their own profit matrix can sustain a 4th f/a. And 738 seat pitch with 162, for example, would still be awfully good, comfy for long hauls.

Long haul is the next big growth area for the low-fares. That's why AA is getting so thuggish with the Long Beach city gov't. Don Cartyleone can see the handwriting on the cabin wall. JetBlue broke the ice--demonstrated that long-haul service without full food service (something that deterred WN, from what I read, in 1998) can be profitable. Now WN wants in on the act. God bless them. I'll eat a $5 McDonald's value meal at the airport and save $200 on my roundtrip airfare any day.

Jim



User currently offline737doctor From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1332 posts, RR: 40
Reply 16, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2545 times:

SJCguy, I've heard that rumor too. But I hear new rumors almost daily. Until I see some sort of press release or company memo, I will remain skeptical...


Patrick Bateman is my hero.
User currently offlineSJCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 579 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 2512 times:

737doctor...same here. The source I heard this from saw a copy of the order to Boeing apparently... dunno, we'll see!

SJCguy


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 7928 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 2499 times:

I think given WN's seating pitch of around 33.6-33.7 inches, if WN does get the 737-800 the seating capacity would probably be the same as the B6 A320 configuration, about 162-165 seats. They'll probably be limited to flights between LAX and OAK on the US West Coast, MDW, and BWI and one other US East Coast destination. In short, they'll be transcon flights only.

User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2434 times:

No way, a B738 order would require the introduction of new safety cards and WN would never do that...they will stick to their unified B737-200/300/500/700 safety card, showing only one emergency exit over the wing...  Wink/being sarcastic


Regards
Udo


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Qantas To Order 5 737-800s And 2 A320s? posted Mon Mar 27 2006 17:48:34 by ClassicLover
Libya's Buraq Air To Buy 737-800's posted Fri Feb 4 2005 15:46:22 by DL021
Boeing To Sell 6 737-800 To Libya's Buraq Air posted Fri Feb 4 2005 02:23:51 by BoeingBus
Ryan Air To Triple 737-800 Fleet posted Thu Oct 7 2004 18:32:30 by Dayflyer
Cost To Operate A 737-800 Or 757-200 posted Wed Jan 21 2004 05:51:54 by ATA767
Bangkok Air To Add 737-800's? posted Mon Apr 7 2003 16:21:19 by 717fan
AS To Acquire B-737-800 Soon? posted Tue Jul 30 2002 18:19:47 by EA CO AS
Westjet To Add 737-800's posted Thu Feb 14 2002 00:50:51 by Dash8King
Varig To Fly 737-800 Winglets posted Mon May 14 2001 17:51:10 by Cruising
Southwest To Order 50 Airplanes posted Mon Jun 19 2000 22:55:56 by Boeing747-400