Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Forgein Airline Cant Fly Domestic? Its A Law?  
User currently offlineFlyboy80 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1878 posts, RR: 3
Posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1811 times:

hey all! i have a question, i was wondering if there is a law against from say a foregin airline, for example JAL, from operating a domestic route such as JFK-SFO? Is there i was just wondering this, is it like this in most countries? thanks
Bri

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRyanair!!! From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 4755 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1805 times:

In most countries, yes, its the law. Something about "freedom" rights. Either that or the airline can stop in LAX on the way to JFK, but they cannot pick up any passengers in LAX.


Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1436 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1789 times:

Most countries don't have official "laws" in their books, but almost all countries will not grant foreign carriers these rights as a matter of policy... and most of the time it is to protect their own airlines.

Check this thread for more info.

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/857871/4/


User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1436 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1780 times:

Check this thread for more info:

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/857871/4/

Most countries don't have official laws against allowing foreign carriers to fly domestic routes with traffic rights, but most countries do have policies that disallow or discourage granting of traffic rights on domestic sectors to foreign carriers. This is done mostly to protect home carriers. Policies and laws are two different, though related, concepts.


User currently offlinePhilB From Ireland, joined May 1999, 2915 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1776 times:

No, it is NOT the law of most countries which places restrictions on foreign carriers operating in this way.

What governs foreign airlines carrying passengers between points in a foreign country are International Air Agreements which define the "freedoms of the air".

One of these, the "fifth freedom", allows the carriage of passengers between points by a carrier in a foreign country or from a foreign country to a yet another foreign country.

These freedoms (a set of restrictions in reality) were laid down at the beginning of international services and have only been slightly amended since.

Within the EU, deregulation has allowed these freedoms to be vastly expanded.

The topic is extremely complex and one of the reasons code share became commonplace around the world was that it offered a way around the restrictions without the international community having to renegotiate a very complex set of rules.

Thus, for instance, my daughter recently flew Manchester to Aberdeen return on a Lufthansa ticket, bought in Leeds.

BMI supplied the aircraft, the flight had a BMI/UAL/DLH flight number and DLH picked up the bulk of the ticket price.

There are many instances of genuine fifth freedom rights but careful study of the OAG is necessary to find them.


User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1436 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1777 times:

whoops i posted twice, sorry - my browser did something funky when I posted the first message.

User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1768 times:

i was wondering if there is a law against from say a foregin airline, for example JAL, from operating a domestic route

No, JAL operates a number of domestic routes such as NRT-ITM, KIX-CTS, etc..


User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39887 posts, RR: 74
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1757 times:

Let me ask you this.
Would you want to fly United or Delta from Berlin to Frankfort when you could fly Lufthansa?


BTW, what is this Delta 727 doing in Germany?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank Schaefer




Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineAOMlover From France, joined Jul 2001, 1305 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1752 times:

In France, Buzz operates domestic flights from different French cities (for example: Toulon-Bordeaux, Bae 146).
And we may consider the easyjet flight Nice-Geneva as a domestic flight, as when you arrive in the airport you are in the French part (this flight is considered as a schengen flight).


User currently offlineStar_world From Ireland, joined Jun 2001, 1234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

B747-437B - yet again, you amaze us with your endless knowledge of the airline industry... of course an airline can operate domestic flights in its own country, there's no law or policy surrounding that. The question was why foreign (ie: based OUTSIDE the country) airlines cannot operate domestic routes.

Typically, this is one of the benefits that alliances offer - the ability for UA, for example, to fly SFO-LHR, and then use a code-share partner like BD to fly the domestic legs onwards from LHR to MAN, for example. UA would not get traffic rights from LHR-MAN by themselves.

star_world


User currently offlineGaruda From Indonesia, joined Nov 2000, 584 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1687 times:

It depends also on the bilateral agreement between the two countries. PanAm had the monopoly on West Berlin routes before the sold the rights to Lufthansa (just before the unification).As far as I remeber PA had a hub in FRA (then Delta took over, this explains the DL 727 pic), and TWA had a hub in CDG.

Also there is some law regulating the domestic airlines, like in Indonesia, only Indonesian-registered planes (PK-xxx) are permitted to fly domestic routes. That's why Lion Air's Yak-42 (Russian registered) could not be deployed in domestic routes.

JA


User currently offlineLewis From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3636 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1662 times:

Countries wont give rights to protect local airlines. Take this for example:

Olympic flies ATH-YUL-YYZ but OA will not take passengers from YUL to YYZ.
Olympic flies ATH-BKK-MEL-SYD but OA will not take passengers from MEL to SYD.


User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1631 times:

I think the word you're looking for is Cabotage...

We Europeans tend to lose our sense of humour over this little notion.


User currently offlineMcdougald From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1620 times:

There is a section in Canada's transportation laws that does allow foreign carriers to operate within Canada -- but only with the approval of the Minister of Transport.

I've never heard of any such approval being sought or given. It's probably only intended to be used in an urgent situation or as a playing card if a minister and an airline chief got into a war of nerves with each other.



User currently offlineTravellin'man From United States of America, joined May 2001, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1603 times:

Within the confines of the US, there are laws governing who can fly domestically; as Backfire notes these are called cabotage laws. They all fall under the Jones Act, which dictates that any entity transporting people and/or cargo from any point within the US to another must be a United States owned and registered company. This applies not only to airplanes, but also to cargo ships and barges, buses, trains. For example a Qantas flight can drop people off from Sydney in LAX and then in JFK, but cannot pickup anyone in LAX who is getting off in JFK; they could only pick someone up who would be flying through to LHR.

Some airlines have 5th freedom rights in the US, which means that they can fly flights in and out of the country that do not originate and terminate in the country where that airline is registered, such as Iberia, which has a hub in Miami, and which flies there to and from Latin American destinations. They cannot fly origin and destination within the US, however.



It is not enough to be rude; one must also be incorrect.
User currently offlineDoug_Or From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3408 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1576 times:

can Iberia pick up a passenger form mia and take them latin america, or do they only offer this for connecting passengers?


When in doubt, one B pump off
User currently offlineEugdog From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2001, 518 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1566 times:

The EU permits airlines registered in other EU countries to operate freely with the EU. Easy Jet have a domestic French service serving Nice and Paris.

I wish this would extend every where as it would encourage more competition. Protecting national flag carriers has no place in modern free market economy. But both unions and the airlines themselves will fight tooht and nail to keep their own market. Free market principal do not stand a chance when narrow self interest is at stake!


User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32789 posts, RR: 72
Reply 17, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

Iberia does not have 5th freedom. 5th freedom flights originate in the country of orgin for the airline, stop in country B (where passengers can be picked up/dropped off), and continue to country C. Iberia has 7th freedom, where a carrier from country A flies between Country B and Country C. None of Iberia's flights from MIA to Central America and Mexico originate in Spain.

Doug_or, with the exception of passengers going to San Salvador, Iberia can pick-up passengers going from MIA to Central America and Mexico.

7th freedom is not common in the US, and the only other two examples I can think of are LanChile's MIA-UIO-GYE and Aero Continente's MIA-GYE.



a.
User currently offlinePhilB From Ireland, joined May 1999, 2915 posts, RR: 13
Reply 18, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1539 times:

Garuda,

Pan Am DID NOT have the monopoly on flights to West Berlin.

Under the Four Power agreements at the end of WW2, Britain, France, the US and USSR divided Germany into zones and Berlin, as the capital, was similarly divided.

As Berlin lay well within the Russian zone and Stalin wanted to do his own thing with "his" part of Germany, he only agreed to air access to Berlin from the West by means of air corridors.

These were agreed along with a restriction that the corridors could only be used by aircraft registered in the US, Britain, France and, strangely, Poland.

Air France, BEA and Pan Am all served Berlin with scheduled services up to and beyond the end of the division of Germany.

From the early 1970s BEA and later BA operated flights for Air France under code shares.

Holiday flights were provided by British charter airlines, including Dan Air, and some American financed operations such as Air Berlinn, using American registered aircraft.

Immediately prior to the end of the division of Germany, a British company called Berlin UK European was serving Berlin from various points with Jetstream 31s.

After the re-unification, when Pan Am was in demise, Delta took over the Pan Am base at Frankfurt and offered connections from both London and Frankfurt to Berlin and other European destinations to connect with trans Atlantic flights.


User currently offlineJasewgtn From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 823 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1511 times:

However, some countries do have agreements that they can operate in each others countries.

Look at New Zealand. Qantas have full rights to fly any domestic routes they wish, and I beleive the same for Air NZ in Australia.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airline To Sell-off Its Art Gems posted Fri Nov 28 2008 06:42:10 by Oa260
Krabi Airline To Fly Oslo - Krabi - Bangkok posted Mon Sep 1 2008 05:52:03 by Mortyman
Hundreds Of Airline Websites May Break EU Law posted Tue Oct 16 2007 13:36:14 by Pe@rson
New Premium European Airline To Fly From MAN/LTN posted Wed Aug 29 2007 01:24:32 by Gilesdavies
7 Atlasjet Planes To Fly Domestic For Saudia posted Tue Feb 6 2007 16:06:04 by TK787
Major US Airline To Fly To Sabiha Gökcen As Of 07 posted Thu Sep 21 2006 03:43:57 by DALelite
Airline To Fly With Reviled Raccoon posted Tue Aug 1 2006 22:29:18 by Legallykev
New Polish Airline: Direct Fly posted Thu Mar 16 2006 00:12:34 by Adamlaskiewicz
Next Latin Airline To Fly To ORD Or SFO? posted Tue Feb 28 2006 03:00:00 by Juventus
Air India Express To Fly Domestic/south East Asia posted Thu Oct 6 2005 20:25:25 by Hawaijahaz