Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
747 With Fifth Engine  
User currently offlineFly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3162 posts, RR: 51
Posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3715 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

A week ago the spotters in FRA were treated to a special sight when a South African B747-200 came in with a fifth engine under the wing. It was ferried in for a company B747-300 that was stranded in FRA:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Konstantin von Wedelstaedt



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Konstantin von Wedelstaedt


Now I didn't know this was still common practice, I've only seen it on older photos, just like these ones here:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © AirNikon



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jörg Tegen


And it seems that it is only possible with the older JT9-powered 747s (as they have a smaller engine diameter).
Do you think the aircraft was able to do the JNB-FRA trip nonstop? How much would the extra fuel consumption be? And would they do it on a regular pax flight? If it was a pure ferry, wouldn't it be more economical to put the engine on a regular full freighter? And finally, interesting that there was no JT9 available in Europe. (Well, IB is the only remaining carrier with JT9-powered 747s in Europe?.
Questions over questions, maybe you can contribute your ideas or some facts.

Konstantin


Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAMSMAN From Ireland, joined Jan 2002, 1016 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3676 times:

Correct me if im wrong but wasn't there a post on this topic already regarding a "third" or "fifth" engine??

Wasn't it all just a bit of digital mastery as in someone is doctoring the photos???

AMS



Aer Lingus, Proud to be Irish.
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2996 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3652 times:

No, this is not a digital trick, they really do fly in extra engines this way. I also believe that the L-1011 can be fitted with a fourth engine for this purpose as well. There are photos of this on this site, but I'm too lazy to do a search. Passengers are allowed on these flights. Incedentally, the Indian 747 that was bombed back in the 80's was one of these flights carrying the extra engine. If you look at the casualty toll, it clearly indicates that passengers were on board.

And OK I lied, here's the L-1011 with the spare engine.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Christos Psarras




The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineFly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3162 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3633 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

AMSMAN are you trying to tell me that I digitally altered my own photos and then post this topic here? Have you noticed that there are two other photographers who have uploaded photos of the same aircraft the same day and it still has five engines?

Thanks, Spacepope, for the more constructive input, I didn't know about either the AI 747 with the fifth engine nor about the L1011.

Konstantin



Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...
User currently offlineLjungdahl From Sweden, joined Apr 2002, 908 posts, RR: 35
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3544 times:

...and here's another one...

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Johan Ljungdahl


...Johan... Big grin


User currently offlineFly-K From Germany, joined May 2000, 3162 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3548 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

So far, all JT9-powered... (incl the Air-India)
Seems to prove my "theory".

Konstantin



Once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been...
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13767 posts, RR: 61
Reply 6, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3525 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I guess these photos don't really speak well for the JT9's reliability!  Big grin


"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3523 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Don Boyd



These are RB211s. So it's not just the old JT9s



User currently offlineBroke From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1322 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3517 times:

To have the ability to carry an extra engine on an airplane, the buyer must have that feature incorporated into the airplane during production. It is not available on the standard airplane by any manufacturer, since it requires extra structural elements to installed inside the wing to be able to pick-up the loads from the stub pylon. Some operators want it and others don't.

User currently offlineAviationIvi From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 777 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3471 times:

I have also digitally altered my photos before uploading them Big grin Big grin Big grin

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ivica Ramljak - FRA Spotting



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ivica Ramljak - FRA Spotting



Ivica


User currently offlineJapanguy From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 81 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3450 times:

I actually flew an NW 742 from NRT to HKG with a 5th engine. It was back in 1995 and it blew my mind.

Incidentally, the 5th engine was on the inside left wing, close to the fuselage. That appears to be the same location on all the pictures above of the 747s. Is there a reason for that/


User currently offlineNZ767 From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 1620 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3427 times:

Closer to COG (Centre of Gravity) Japanguy.

User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1436 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3356 times:

The technical term for it is "fifth pod ops". Only the Classic 747s offer this and it is an option, not a standard feature.

User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3349 times:

Ex_SQer.........
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Don Boyd



Classics only?


User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1436 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3312 times:

777236ER:

You got me there! SQ didn't opt for 5th pod with its -400s and for some reason I must have thought that Boeing didn't offer it!

Note to self:
The world doesn't revolve around SQ.
The world doesn't revolve around SQ.
The world doesn't revolve around SQ.

Writing that on my whiteboard even as we speak  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



User currently offline744rules From Belgium, joined Mar 2002, 407 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3263 times:

On all 747 you can still see the underwing attach points (it shows Spare Engine Mount) . To bad I have no good camera. Is it an option or not ??

User currently offlineJapanguy From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 81 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3236 times:

OK, I get the COG part of it, but why the left side? Flip of a coin?

User currently offlineLeezyjet From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 4042 posts, RR: 53
Reply 17, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3169 times:

Japanguy,

My guess would be that the engineers can fit it without hindering the loading that goes on on the starboard (right) side.

I saw that special coloured SAA 743 at LHR about 2 years ago with a 5th pod.

I would imagine that it is cheaper for the airline to ferry their own engine in and have it fitted rather than pay out to lease one/buy one from elsewhere. Also it doesn't actually take all that long to change an engine, and I know that SAA usually run with their delays (at LHR they do) rather than send the pax on other airlines/flights so they usually end up with about a 12-18 hour delay by doing this, as the new engine would arrive on one of the first flights the next morning, meaning that the new engine could be inplace for an afternoon departure.


 Smile



"She Rolls, 45 knots, 90, 135, nose comes up to 20 degrees, she's airborne - She flies, Concorde Flies"
User currently offlinePhilB From Ireland, joined May 1999, 2915 posts, RR: 13
Reply 18, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3162 times:

VC10s were also equipped for fifth pod ops and I seem to remember that the engine was carried on the port side. Because of the configuration of the VC10, the engine was in a streamlined pod hung under and to to front of the wing.

Fifth pod ops carry passengers - that's the whole point - to get an engine from A to B with the least cost and fuss. There are weight/performance penalties but these are far cheaper than using a freighter.


User currently offlineEx_SQer From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1436 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3141 times:

Just to add: SQ didn't opt for 5th pod with their 744s because they were building up a fleet of 744 freighters, and diverting a 744F to deliver an engine was the preferred option to operating a fleet of 744s with that option... and their associated maintenance/engineering requirements

User currently offlineMr AirNZ From New Zealand, joined Feb 2002, 879 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 3100 times:

The technical term for it is "fifth pod ops". Only the Classic 747s offer this and it is an option, not a standard feature

If this is the case why then have I seen a Qantas 747-400 carrying the 5th engine. (Im off to look for a photo now).


User currently offlineMr AirNZ From New Zealand, joined Feb 2002, 879 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 3093 times:

Here is a SAA 747-444 carrying a fith engine.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Don Boyd



User currently offlineJustplanesmart From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 724 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3054 times:

I recall seeing a photo of a Qantas 707 with a fifth engine, also on the port wing inboard of the engine mounts. The spare was mising the fan shroud, and had a streamlined pod in its place. I cannot remember where I saw the picture.


"So many planes; so little time..."
User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 23, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2998 times:

Qantas always does this. There have been numerous incidents involving Qantas B747s and QF does always ferry a fith engine to replace it. I've seen it a few times in Singapore. The B744s can ferry the fith pod too.


Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 24, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2991 times:




Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offline9V-SVA From Singapore, joined Aug 2001, 1860 posts, RR: 8
Reply 25, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2970 times:

When 9V-SQC's RR Trent 884 engine went tech about 3-4 years ago in Karachi, SIA sent up a 744F carrying a spare engine, tools and crew up to KHI to replace the engine.

Since SIA has such a large fleet of freighters, they might as well send one up instead of retrofitting all its 744s with that option(costs $0

9V-SVA



9V-SVA | B772ER
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
747 With A Tail Engine. posted Mon May 20 2002 15:44:03 by Ronen
BA 747 With Double RR Markings On Engine posted Thu Feb 23 2006 04:19:12 by TheBigOne
AC003 Flying To NRT With Two Engine Air Bleeds Not Working? posted Sat Nov 25 2006 03:59:50 by Ktachiya
Air Atlanta 747 With Different Blue Tail Question posted Mon Oct 9 2006 18:10:12 by MIAMIx707
Future Of 747-400 And 747-8 With British Airways posted Fri Aug 4 2006 20:11:13 by CX747
AA 777 With An Engine Problem posted Wed Jul 26 2006 16:21:36 by TPAnx
An MD11 With No #2 Engine? Surely Not! posted Fri Jul 14 2006 16:31:52 by CHRISBA777ER
Strange 747 With B52 Style Engines... posted Wed Jul 5 2006 20:15:59 by Magyarorszag
747's And One Engine Flight posted Tue Jun 13 2006 22:53:45 by Mymiles2go
Nomore 747 With South African? posted Mon Nov 28 2005 21:19:01 by Myk