Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aircraft Ownership Vs Aicraft Lease  
User currently offlineMEA From Australia, joined Jan 2001, 631 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 1681 times:

I was just wondering would it be better for an airline to lease or own their aircraft?

Obviously, if you had the capital you would purchase the aircarft but are the repayments justified compared to leasing costs?



3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSAS23 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1678 times:

Depends entirely on the aircraft. Few airlines can afford to spend $200m + for a new A380, for example; so they will lease. However, few leasing companies are interested in the bottom end of the market so if you are in a developing nation and want, say, a B737-200 you'll almost certainly have to pay cash for it.

User currently offlineLMML 14/32 From Malta, joined Jan 2001, 2565 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1665 times:

Besides the large capital outlay of purchasing aircraft an airline has to think about depreciation and resale value of the asset. Post September 11, aircraft prices have gone down sharply and hence aircraft that owned aircraft found their balance sheet in the red as the value of their owned aircraft also depreciated sharply. On the other hand aircraft prices also went down and airlines are capitalising on this and are renewing their fleet at bargain rates. This also means that leasing airplanes has also become cheaper because the lessors are buying the planes for less and there are surplus parked aircraft all over the world which has made supply greater than the demand - hence the lower rates.

An advantage of leasing is that airlines can capacity with demand by changing aircraft more frequently. Another advantage is the fast pace of technology where airlines can compete and offer the latest seat technology (comfort, entertainment etc) as it comes available. This can be done easily by returning the planes to the lessor and obtaining newer ones without the airline having to invest on the equipment itself. This, of course, depends on the leasing agreement.

There is more, much more, to leasing vs purchasing. But I hope you find this useful.


User currently offlineJfk747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1630 times:


It really depends, I think its better to purchase aircraft.

A- You can finance them at similar lease prices
B- You can take loans on the aircraft
C- You can write it off as a physical asset.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Help Lower The Cost Of Aircraft Ownership posted Sun Mar 5 2006 00:50:38 by Coasterbuoy
Jet2/Channel Express/Dart Group Aircraft Ownership posted Sat Aug 20 2005 14:30:37 by Philb
Which Aircraft Does VS Use On LHR-BOS? posted Thu Mar 10 2005 01:03:52 by Clrd4t8koff
Aircraft Range Vs. Payload Performance posted Tue Oct 5 2004 16:47:09 by Iowa744fan
Wet Lease Vs. Dry Lease posted Fri Sep 3 2004 01:21:45 by Rydel
Wet Lease VS. Dry Lease. posted Sun Sep 21 2003 19:43:30 by QB737
Wet Lease Vs Dry Lease posted Fri Oct 11 2002 22:44:56 by Ripcordd
Which Aircraft For VS 48 On Jul30? posted Sun Jul 29 2001 06:26:46 by BaliMorris
Hidden Aircraft Ownership posted Sun May 13 2001 07:00:37 by Monocleman
Wet Vs. Dry Lease posted Sun Aug 22 1999 19:12:57 by SOCAL Approach