Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airline Staff: Americans React To Flying Airbus?  
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8115 posts, RR: 53
Posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1547 times:

This is for the employees of UA, US, NW, AA, HP, Frontier, Jet Blue. How does the average American feel about flying on a European-built airliner? Do they know they're on an Airbus? Do they know Airbus aren't American? Do they mind? When they find that a foreign-built airliner flies just like an American-built airliner, are they surprised? Do they like the extra cabin width?


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1531 times:

The extra cabin width is at the wrong place. Your shoulder actually touches the side wall on the 320--this does not happen on the 737's.

User currently offlineFlyua From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 318 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1498 times:

Here's a UA response:

While I feel and appreciate huge differences between my favorite A320 and Boeing's older narrowbodies, at least in terms of workspace quality, I rarely sense that any of my passengers can tell -- or even care -- that there's a difference. Most just board my Airbus as submissively and war-weary (you know -- that "I just want to get there... I don't care on what" posture) as on a narrowbody Boeing.

My passengers DEFINITELY react differently when they board a B777! "Oh wow! This one's MUCH bigger than the one from Omaha!" "Look at the cute little TV's in the seat....now how the %#$ do I turn it on?" ...There is one instance, however, when some passengers seem to perk up and look around when on an A319/A320: at engine start-up, the loud noise associated with the hydraulic systems and flap movings (it sounds like a very loud dentist's drill...) usually gets a few heads turned and the occasional worried remarks. The 'bus is a talkative girl!


User currently offlineLMP737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1359 times:

The average American traveler does not notice whether the plane is Boeing or Airbus. I'm sure there are some out there that do and prefer to fly Boeing A/C since it's made in the states. There are not many of them however.

User currently offline762er From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 542 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1339 times:

A US Airways response:
I have heard many positive responses about the increased cabin width on the 320 family aircraft and especially the over head bin size. Since the only 737's we fly are classics(-300,-400) a surprising number of our pax notice and appreciate the differences, just in terms of cleanliness, video monitors, quieter cabin, etc...Now as for the A330-300 we get responses very similar to what Flyua said about the 777. Our transatlantic pax seem to love that airplane. There are some who have chosen US based largely on the 333. But again, I think the percentage of our pax who even care what kind of airplane they are on is less the 20%. That's just the way the majority of the flying American public is. I haven't heard any complaints about flying on a European built aircraft. I really don't think the typical passenger cares one way or another.


User currently offlineSeiple From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1325 times:

Most travelers don't know off of which aircraft they just stepped.
Most people do not choose flights based on aircraft type. If the price is right, I doubt 95% of flying Americans will care if it is a B737 or an A320.

Legroom is more of an issue than cabin width.

Personally, I prefer the MD-80.


User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1311 times:

No Airbus is 100% European, and no Boeing is 100% American...the magic word is called globalisation...


Airbus vs Boeing discussions make me just:  Yawn Yawn Yawn Yawn Yawn Yawn Yawn


Regards
Udo


User currently offline0A340 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 266 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1303 times:

I have noticed the difference when flying UA and changing from a bigger 757 to a smaller 319 while connecting through IAD. The 757 looked like a narrow pencil to me, and the 'smaller' 319 a much-wider cabin. Even an extra inch or so in seat width is welcome.

But I didn't base the itinenary choice on equipment. Y'a know, price, timing, FF miles, bonuses etc come way ahead in the list of priorities. Given an otherwise same deal, I'd take the 320-series any time.



User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1291 times:

Unless you're one of those aviation junkies, (That describes 99.9999999% of us on this site) you probably don't know a 737 from a CRJ. All that most people know it that it is an airplane, and it gets them where they need to go, whether it from NY to LA, or Boston to Seattle, most people don't book their flights for aircraft types, they book for the best fare they can get. Now having been a non-rev in the past, I honestly did choose most of my flights based on the aircraft type being used. When I worked for AirTran, I tried to avoid the 737s because I really don't like the three abreast seating, because it's a pain in the butt unless you have a row to yourself. When I worked for ASA, I flew nearly ever type of aircraft Delta flies, with the exception of the 737-800 and the MD-90 (neither aircraft were flying the routes at the times I wanted to fly) I basically booked my trips with aircraft types in mind. I tried to get most of my flights on widebodies because I would be more likely to get seated in Business Class than I would on a narrowbody. I only ever flew in Business Class in a narrowbody on Delta twice. But for the typical traveller, the aircraft type for the most part is irrelevent to them. As long as the flight's on time, and doesn't crash, that's alright for most passengers.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Americans' Attitude To Flying In The US Since 9/11 posted Mon Jun 17 2002 21:04:33 by Cedarjet
MIA Says Mystery Airline Commits To Flying MIA-CPT posted Mon Feb 21 2005 09:25:12 by MAH4546
New Webpage Asking Americans To Boycott Airbus posted Wed Feb 26 2003 22:41:18 by North County
New Airline Off To Flying Start posted Mon Sep 2 2002 12:01:39 by Heisan67
Airline Staff To Blame Of Air Rage This Time? posted Fri May 11 2001 03:37:02 by JaseWGTN
Airline With A380 Service To The Moon? posted Thu Nov 2 2006 15:59:44 by HangarRat
Boeing Aims To Keep Airbus @ Bay No 787 Delays! posted Fri Oct 20 2006 04:26:05 by Coelacanth
Airbus:Gov. Influence Comes Back To Haunt Airbus posted Fri Oct 13 2006 15:27:00 by Halibut
Customers Back A380 To Keep Airbus Solvent posted Thu Oct 12 2006 02:07:15 by N328KF
Staff At STN To Strike Over Bank Holiday posted Fri Aug 18 2006 14:08:18 by BananaBoY