Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA Flights To LGB...  
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Posted (11 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1993 times:

Why did they start serving LGB from JFK and ORD using only temporary slots when they lose the slots to Jetblue when Jetblue wants to use them? Isnt it a waste or will LGB lift the slot restrictions? I thought they should have stuck with ONT from JFK.




12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1944 times:

Can anyone please explain this?

User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5772 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1929 times:

By starting the flights, AA can determine an amount of lost revenue IF they are forced to end the flights. That would add to their case in any court fight.

I understand that LGB limits are based roughly on the concept of total allowable noise divided by average individual aircraft noise levels to get to the 41 slots. The avg. aircraft noise level is a number from the 80's when aircraft were noisier. So it is possible that more slots will be added once a new aircraft noise number is determined. But many of the locals want to hold at 41 no matter how much quieter the aircraft are today.



"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1900 times:

Ok.. Thanks. I see where you are coming from now. If AA does well with these flights, after JB takes their slots away, and AA is unable to use them, when and if they more slots become available, AA will restart the flights. If they dont do well, then, they wont restart them.

Thanks again.


User currently offlineFlyingbronco05 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3840 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1881 times:

I already have flown ORD-LGB route twice. It's a nice substitute from SAN and SNA. However, those 4 hour flights without IFE is boring. Now my family looks for flights into SAN or SNA with the 737s or 757s. At least those have IFE!


Never Trust Your Fuel Gauge
User currently offlineFlyingbronco05 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3840 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1875 times:

For those of you who don't know, the flights from ORD to LGB are operated on Super 80's.


Never Trust Your Fuel Gauge
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1839 times:

If you want to know WHY AA started the flights from JFK-LGB-JFK... There is only one explanation, and no it isn't to see how well they would do  Insane The real answer was to... COMPETE WITH jetBlue, and see if they could kick them out, and then pull out after jetBlue was gone... Mmmmhmmm. That is the truth. There are still a few people who don't realize the truth, but a little research will prove it  Smile

User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1833 times:

BR715: IOW, 'competition.'

You compete where you need to, when you need to.

Of course, that's not the kind of thing they cover in high school, but if you go to college, you'll learn about it.

Steve


User currently offlineSccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5396 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1826 times:

...IOW, Predatory Competition.

Can you say, "Legend"?

I think JetBlue has a better balance sheet, though.



...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
User currently offlineCannedSPam From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1799 times:

Sccutler, there is nothing predatory about AA starting up additional trips to LGB....

User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1804 times:

Expect years of legislation on this issue, leaving several near- and long-term options:

Near term(happening on January 6, 2003, the day they get their slots revoked):

1) AA pulls the flights while waiting for legislation(small chance, but it goes against their general MO of court cases).

2) AA Pulls ORD, but switches two DFW slots to JFK(could see this happening).

3) AA stays arguing that they have to see how the court decision and all the appeals courts will rule on this(Very realistic).

4) AA tries to stay, but LGB impounds any additional aircraft that AA flies over their daily limit of 5(fairly unrealistic).

Long-term(several months or years after January 6, 2003):

1) Cap taken off of number of flights, but LGB limits gate space keeping the amount of daily flights between 41 and 50.

2) Change to slot use-it or lose-it rule ruled illegal causing the old rule to be put back into place, and JetBlue settles to give back some of the slots(anywhere from 4, the amount AA wants to use currently, to 24(the amount unused after 6 months)).

3) No changes from what is happening now(Realistic, but not likely given AA's powerful lawyer team).

4) By the time this gets through all the appeals courts, one or both of the airlines will be in bankruptcy court(Very realistic)

All long-term solutions are fairly realistic, so mix and match with the short term.


User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 11, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1804 times:

BR715-A1-30, err, flight Level, err, ILS... I would be really stupid to listen to you.

Obviously, they are seeing how well they will do, because they are going to lose the slots on those routes sooner or later.

Whether they want them back when the new slots are available, is determined on how well they do now.



User currently offlineSccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5396 posts, RR: 26
Reply 12, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1791 times:

Of course it is predatory. All business is, to one extent or another.

Whether you agree with it or depends (in large measure) on whose axe you are grinding. If you are an AA employee, an employee of an AA contractor, or one of the class of people for whom less competition for AA (this applies, of course, to any carrier, AA's simply our example here), you think AA's policies in this regard are marvelous.

If you are one of the hapless consumers whose pockets are regularly picked and whose choices are restricted as a result of a fortress carrier running a smaller and less-costly carrier out of a particular market pair, well, you don't much like predatory pricing.

AA's consistent pattern of similar behavior has been discussed to death on these forums, and I'll not presume to rehash it now. AA has successfully defended its practices in court in the past, so (at least as of now) "predatory" is not analogous to "illegal."

But there is a vast universe of things one can do which are not illegal (or at which one might not be caught); but these things are not thus rendered fair or right.



...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
All AA Flights To CUR Cancelled? posted Sun May 21 2006 15:31:29 by A388
Inaugural UA/AA Flights To LHR posted Wed Feb 1 2006 04:20:56 by ZChannel
AA Flights To Hawaii Out Of SJC - Full? posted Mon Jul 15 2002 05:49:01 by SJCguy
AA Flights To Brazil posted Fri Dec 29 2000 17:01:34 by Copacabana
AA Flights To Brazil posted Sat Oct 7 2000 20:28:12 by 767-300ER
New AA Flights To S. America!? posted Wed Jun 28 2000 04:27:42 by Neo
AA To Add Two Daily Flights To Colombia posted Wed May 9 2007 03:22:00 by MAH4546
AA Codesharing On Alaska's Flights To YEG posted Wed Aug 9 2006 17:13:41 by Yegbey01
Why AA Switching Some T9 Flights To T8 At JFK? posted Mon Jul 24 2006 23:45:02 by RJpieces
AA Codeshares On EI Flights To LHR posted Sat Apr 22 2006 11:42:30 by EIRules