Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Help Me Understand This Delta Move  
User currently offlineBoeing757/767 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2286 posts, RR: 1
Posted (16 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1964 times:

Delta Air Lines today announced new 767-300 service between Hartford and JFK -- a whopping 100-mile flight.

The flight number continues on to Paris, but a change of plane is needed.

As a Connecticut resident, I'm all for more flights to Hartford. But in the time it takes to catch this flight and wait at JFK for European connections, you could drive to JFK.

Current connections involve Jetstream 41 commuters. Instead of these or the 767-300, why not replace them with regional jets coming into the DL network?

Anyway, why would Delta commit a 767-300 to this route considering the distance is so small?

Free-thinking, left-leaning secularist
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineFlyAA757 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1031 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (16 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1829 times:

My guess is that this aircraft would have just been sitting around anyway and that DL is now running VERY low on gate space in the afternoon/evening at JFK. It looks like theres a Delta 767-300 factory pumping those things out around the corner at 4/5/6PM at JFK!

User currently offlineFlyPNS1 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 7100 posts, RR: 23
Reply 2, posted (16 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1803 times:

I think FlyAA is right....Delta needs to get that 767 out of the way....so why not send it on a little jaunt up to BDL (a fine airport might I add....the first time I ever flew was from BDL). It does seem wasteful and I bet it won't last for too long. Once other planes come on line, Delta will probably do some shuffling of aircraft.

User currently offlineCannedSpam From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (16 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1797 times:

I would say that DL is using this flight to reposition the aircraft for the Europe trip. AA does the same thing..although not on such a short distance. Since the aircraft needs to go from BDL to JFK, why not offer it as revenue service and market it as a onestop to Europe rather than send it as a ferry flight?

User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 9027 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (16 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1787 times:

Boston could use another. Currently, we have a 4:30 shuttle to LGA, 5:00 763 ER to JFK and a 72S to LGA at 5:30. The 763 goes to AMS (against NWA). I say the flight should go to BOS, then to JFK, then to Europe (Paris???)


User currently offlineBbinchi From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (16 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1761 times:

I tend to agree with "CannedSpam". When I worked Res. for DL many years ago we had a late night L-1011 fly in to CVG (I think from ATL and it was nearly full every night) during the fall and winter months. Then the a/c laid over in CVG and went out with perhaps a 25% load factor to ORD around 08:00 the next day. But, from O'Hare, it went out chock full to PBI at around 0930.

It seemed to make no sense at all; we always thought why not operate that L10 ATL-ORD at night? We thought surely a late-night ATL-ORD L10 would make just as much money (maybe more) as ATL-CVG.

I guess DL figured if the a/c had to lay over somewhere why not make it CVG (so long as you could fill it up on that leg), put in on the short hop to ORD early the next morning (popular business run but not enough to fill all 302 seats on the L10 in those days) and make some more money? However, given the loads on that CVG-ORD run it seemed like any incremental revenue would have been offset by fuel/crew expenses and landing fees.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Help Me Understand This Picture posted Sat Aug 5 2006 19:29:14 by Ambassador
Please Help Me ID This 757 posted Wed Aug 2 2006 19:27:50 by Luisde8cd
Help Me Identify This Airport, Please! posted Fri Mar 31 2006 21:00:55 by Blackened
Help Me Identify This Aircraft At PDX posted Thu Sep 8 2005 19:22:45 by HPRamper
Help Me Identify This 737 posted Wed Sep 7 2005 01:56:16 by F9Widebody
SW & SeaTac - Help Me Understand Airport Charges! posted Mon Aug 22 2005 22:56:03 by Nwray
Help Me Identify This Plane posted Wed Jul 27 2005 22:34:56 by RDJeff
Help Me Id This Business Jet posted Fri May 20 2005 14:20:59 by BA757
Help Me Identify This Aircraft / Registration posted Tue Feb 1 2005 06:47:54 by F9Widebody
Please Help Me Identify This 747 posted Wed Oct 6 2004 00:57:01 by Clickhappy