Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Will Alaska Airlines Take The Nestea Plunge?  
User currently offlineFrontierMan From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 413 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1601 times:

Will Alaska stay healthy through this crash.

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineChe From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 537 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (14 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1465 times:

I think things will be slow for now but when all the news dies down about the crash and MD-80s Alaska Airlines will be fine.

User currently offlineDeltaAir From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1094 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1455 times:

It seems that new developments have come up with the FAA investigation. The same plane that crashed was known to have the problem, but when reinspected the part was magically fine, but never replaced. This is the same for a few others in the fleet as well.

User currently offlineCharles802 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 380 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (14 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1450 times:

I wrote a thread about that a little ways down "The Plot thickens in the AS investigation"

Honestly...if the same test was repeated 5 times, and the results were all within tolerance, than I would think the plane is safe. What is unfortunate about this crash, is that Alaska probably has the safest planes in the air right now of any airline, but people are still looking at what MAY have happened 14-18 months ago.


User currently offlineHypermike From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1001 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (14 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1428 times:

What has saved AS so far has been that they've handled the press very well. In other crashes, the media have attacked the airlines because of their lack of information. Alaska has been very cooperative with everything and everyone.

User currently offlineSeat 1a From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1425 times:

I tend to think different... Alaska, you're in BIG trouble!

I am not a lawyer, but one thing i know is that AK will stay in court for the next ten years! welcome to U.S. tort law!

who cares about handling the media.... judges and jury's don't care about the media.... they care about who died and how they died. they care about a part that was clearly worn and unservicible.

my question to forum members is...

what is the mtce & inspection requirements of the screw and gimble nut?


User currently offlineOnTheFly From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 51 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (14 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1410 times:

I think the short- and long- term survival of the airline depends on public perception. Is the airline perceived as a party interested in doing all they can for the families and assisting investigators in any way possible? Or are they perceived as more interested in shifting blame, and denying any culpability before all the facts are in. It's a tough balancing act, especially in the "instant news cycle" media environment we live in. With so many news organizations chasing so few "facts" the truth tends to get distorted. How many inspections occurred, what were the findings, what are the relevant FAA regulations? Media "experts" rarely get these details right. It's in the airline's interest to set the record straight on a factual basis but without seeming insensitive or overly defensive. I think they've been very effective at striking this balance, particularly through their web site, where they can help fill the information vacuum without having to call a press conference and respond to unnecessarily provocative and misleading questions from reporters. So far, I give them high marks for how they've handled this terrible situation.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will AirTran Finally Take The 737-800? posted Mon Nov 6 2006 22:51:43 by AkjetBlue
Will KL/AF Take The Ex-TAM F-100's? posted Thu Jun 16 2005 17:50:55 by KL911
Will Alaska Airlines SEA-MIA Runs Go To 738's? posted Tue Mar 8 2005 06:45:50 by Bronko
Alaska Airlines Breaking The Law! posted Fri Jul 2 2004 23:39:37 by N901FRWOLF
Will VS Really Take The 777? posted Sun Oct 5 2003 22:37:49 by Intheknow
Will Alaska Airlines Get More B737-200's? posted Fri Nov 1 2002 04:36:15 by Alaskaairlines
Alaska Airlines And The MD80 posted Tue Oct 23 2001 23:44:37 by FedExHeavy
Alaska Airlines In The News (AGAIN!) posted Tue Aug 8 2000 14:13:38 by L-188
Will Singapore Airlines Eventually Take The A332? posted Mon Jun 30 2003 19:59:05 by Airmale
Will Airlines Want The First Twenty A380s? posted Thu Oct 5 2006 00:16:47 by BoomBoom