Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Differences: 757,767,777?  
User currently offlineBigPhilNYC From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 4077 posts, RR: 54
Posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2209 times:

I was spotting at JFK with Mirrodie the other day and I embarrassed myself throughout the entire time lovely.

I kept wrongly identifying aircraft. When I see a plane form the side, it's pretty easy. But when they are facing me, I have a tough time.

I know that the 752 is not as thin as the 753, and therefore I was confusing it with the 762. How pathetic of me! lol

I need an all out list. I need a compliation of the identifiable features and differences between the following planes, ALL of the physical differences, for ALL of it's multiple versions:

757

767

777

A300

A310

Please help me. And try not to rip on me too much. I've done a thread search, but can't get an altogether list.

I thank you in advance for you assistance.


Phil Derner Jr.
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePhilB From Ireland, joined May 1999, 2915 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2168 times:

If you want a simple guide:

From head on ALL 757s look exactly the same as they use the same fuselage.

All 767s look the same, ditto the 777.

To tell between them, a simplistic way is that the 757 has a dolphin nose and has bigger windows and looks quite "leggy". From the side, there is an extra set of windows in front of the wings on the 753 and the aircraft looks exceedingly long compared to a 752

The 767 has "meaner" looking windows and looks closer to the ground and fatter from the front. The 300 has extra length in front of the wing and the design looks "balanced" compared to the short and stubby looking 200. The 400 looks very long.

The 777 is out on its own. From the front, mean windows, very rotund and the engines are, by comparison, massive.

A300 to A310 from the side is easy, as the 310 is comparatively short and has only one exit door in front of the wing. Iimpossible to tell apart from the front as theyshare the same fuselage barrel.





User currently offlineDesert_dweller From Canada, joined Apr 2002, 92 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2126 times:

One easy way of distinguishing the 777 from the 757 and 767 is that its main landing gear (beneath the wings, not to be confused with the nose gear) has 3 pairs of wheels while the 767 and 757 have a pair of 2 wheels.

777 gear


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wietse de Graaf



757 and 767 gear


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wietse de Graaf



User currently offlineAirbus_A340 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2000, 1560 posts, RR: 20
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2116 times:

Have a gander around the photo database here on airliners.net and learn/take down notes for yourself on the differences between the aircraft  Smile

Trevor



People. They make an airline. www.cathaypacific.com
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2077 times:

Yes, looking at the database is an excellent idea.

Another 777 visual que', it's the only one out of the group with a tapered tail. Whereas the rest have a cone tail.


User currently onlineATA L1011 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1385 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2038 times:

Another way to tell the A300 from the A310 from the front is look at them from front to rear and the 310 sits more flat. The A300 sits low in the front ang the body angles up as you go toward the rear as with the 330,340 and 777. Also the wing on the A300 angles up more toward the end and sits higher off the gorund than the 310's wing tip.


Treat others as you expect to be treated!
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7444 posts, RR: 62
Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1971 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hola, Phil. This is something I posted a while back and Cfalk got much respect for it. The pics may not show as more than "x"es but you can click on them and they open.

Whatcha think?

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/379338/4/



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineBigPhilNYC From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 4077 posts, RR: 54
Reply 7, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1939 times:

Thank you Mirrodie, that was a bit more helpful.

Also, Mirrodie pointed out to me thatthe main gear on the 767 is angled downward, as opposed to the 777 and 757, which angle upward.



Phil Derner Jr.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing's Stretches: 737-9, 757-3, 767-4, 777-3 posted Tue Dec 25 2001 17:36:08 by Vfw614
Sonic Cruiser As 757/767 & 777/330 Replacement posted Thu Apr 26 2001 21:54:51 by F4N
Air Canada 777, 757, 767-400? posted Thu Oct 19 2000 21:26:54 by SKYSERVICE_330
Why No 737, 767. 777 For NW posted Tue Aug 29 2006 06:41:40 by FL370
Boeing 747/767/777 Could Carry Wing-mount Missiles posted Tue Jun 13 2006 06:27:20 by MD-90
Long Haul Seating Differences - 757 Vs. 707/DC-8 posted Tue May 30 2006 00:50:41 by AeroWesty
757/767 Type Ratings posted Fri Feb 3 2006 06:24:33 by DC10rules
AZ 767/777 On Opproach To BFI On 10/17? posted Tue Oct 18 2005 07:42:16 by Lemurs
Best Operational Cost, 757, 767, Or A310? posted Mon Aug 1 2005 05:33:19 by Airplane
A350 Tackles 767, 777, 787; Replaces 300, 310 & 330 posted Fri May 20 2005 11:41:36 by BrightCedars