Nygfan84 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 172 posts, RR: 0 Posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1605 times:
There has been rumors lately that Usairways will use an A330 to fly from Philly to Hononlulu 2 or 3 times a week I believe. I think this is a great idea and I am confident those flights will be jam packed every time. I believe a lot of people from not just Philly but the surrounding areas would like to get to Hawaii non-stop from the East.
Ouboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4482 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1571 times:
I don't see US having any 330s free to do a trip to HNL. Of course this all depends on who they ally with. If it is UAL...they don't need to fly to HNL. They are also going to need the 330s to take over for the 767-200s that will be getting retired.
Any opinion/comment posted is that of my own and not that of Southwest Airlines Co.
ScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1486 times:
Do you even will goes to try chance fly new routes nonstop from PHL,PIT, CLT-HNL flight as for Airbus A330/A340. Just please think about this one for US Airways. This is really need stepped up more passengers on the new routes nonstop by long-hauls flight. Do you even know this is way to do either take fly to HNL or OGG. Well, see ya!
Gregg From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 327 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1465 times:
the westbound flight from philly to hnl might be too long for the A330 to do reliably in winter. Wouldn't they put a longer range 767 on the route, and use the A330 (that are 3 class, vs 2 class on the 767) for the europe routes.
Dutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 7, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1454 times:
There is a rumor about US flying to HNL going around, but I heard that the route would be flown with 762s a few times a week......you may have noticed that US has added may resort destinations in the caribbean lately, flying to some of the islands with weekend only services. We may see the same to HNL - from what I can figure out, much has to do with making its frequent flyer programme more attractive in an effort to keep its business travellers happy. The potential of free trips to Hawaii and Aruba and other such places is an effort to keep businessmen and women on US Airways planes.
John From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1374 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1375 times:
Neither the A333 or B762 have the range capability for that route. FCO-PHL, for instance, is stretching it for BOTH equipment types. There have been instances, mostly on the west bound departures during summer, where it either took a weight restriction or added an involuntary tech stop from FCO. It happens more often than you would think, due to full capacity loads out of FCO.
762er From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 542 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1325 times:
John: The 767-200er with max payload (pax and cargo) can make PHL-HNL every time guaranteed, unless there were 75-100kt headwinds the entire way. Otherwise there would never be a problem. http://boeing.com/assocproducts/aircompat/767sec3.pdf. The 330-300X could make it with full pax if winds are normal but would as you said be weight restricted for cargo. In the winter months it may have a problem with just pax on some days. If they were to use the 333 to HNL it'd probably make more sense to fly it out of PIT just to shorten the route by a couple hundred miles and not have to worry about kicking passengers off because of restrictions. I work in flight safety at PIT and one of my boss's is a 762er Capt. and another guy I work with is a 333 F/O.
Fsuwxman From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 439 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1259 times:
I think in theory, it would be nice to have nonstop service from the east coast to HNL. But given U financial position and the fact that alot of the pax that are going to HNL are using free ticket from FF miles, would it even be profitable. Just my opinion. Regards
AA717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 11, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1237 times:
HNL flights are notoriously low yield. That's why few carriers have jumped on the East Coast-HNL bandwagon. If U does it, it will either be by codeshare or because they are desperate for even a pittance of yield that a 330 will generate on that route.TC
FutureFO From Ireland, joined Oct 2001, 3132 posts, RR: 22
Reply 15, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 970 times:
This would prove as a fatal mistake for the all ready struggling USAirways. Considering they would probably look at HNL as they view FL as a seasonal market. Therefore it would be the biggest mistake that US could make.
Yyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16228 posts, RR: 57
Reply 16, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 962 times:
Generally low-yield routes (such as HNL) can only support older aircraft (since newer aircraft are only profitable on the higher yield business routes). Hence, the 762 is the more ideal choice than the 333.
PHL-HNL is easily handled by the 762. AC has flown YYZ-HNL with the 763 for years.
Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
Penguinflies From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 984 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 910 times:
Interesting assessment considering that there are operators of new 767-300s A330s (charter operators), and newer 747-400s going into HNL, along with the 737-700s and -800s.
Just to point out that AA cost per seat mile on a 767 is something like 4 cents and they yield on average 8 cents a flight. The 757s do slightly better. US Airways has a lower cost per seat mile than AA does because, on average, they fly their A330s more per day. Also, it costs less for CO to run a 767-400 than a DC-10. UA Switched to a mix 767, 757, 777 fleet which operated at a lower cost than the older DC-10s. Therefore IMO, older aircraft are less likely to profitable on a low yield route.
--Based upon 2001 3Q Form 41 since most of the airlines operated their respective fleet types (with the one exception being the UA DC-10)
FF miles redemption is limited too. I know TW limited about 5% of its seats on Hawaii flights to FF miles, Students and Senior travel packs combined. It was about 9 seats on a 767. Sometimes booking at the max limit (something like 330 days) was not even enough time to get the student travel. The rest of the seats (200+) were sold at the higher fares and at travel agencies.
US would have problem just from the cost and travel time from the east coast. Most people would like to visit Hawaii and decide to go to Florida and Caribbean because it is cheaper and quicker. People lose almost 2 days off a vacation traveling to Hawaii from anywhere east of the Rockies. Including jet lag, why would anyone pick Hawaii over a closer, more affordable sunny destination.
Penguinflies From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 984 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 744 times:
Range also takes into account other factors. Maximum range with a full payload on a day above 80 degrees might limit the amount of cargo and passengers. Bad weather on the west coast might add fuel in case of a mid-pacific diversion back to LAX or SFO or another alternate.
Hawaii is great, but for the most bang for the buck, I would tell people not to go to my home state but Mexico or somewhere else nearer to my current timezone (central US). If you like come den come cuz.