Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
This Could Happen Here  
User currently offlinePhilB From Ireland, joined May 1999, 2915 posts, RR: 13
Posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1218 times:

Avweb has just settled out of court with Arthur Alan Volk, Aviation Safety Expert, who sued them on a number of bases.

Whilst Avweb themselves went gunning for Mr Volk, one part of his action against them was "that Avweb did not supervise their chat room to prevent libelous comments about him being published by their
subscribers."

Perhaps our Belgian friends who do not like a certain Irish airline and publish unsubstantiated statements about its safety should take serious note, as should the moderators and the site owner.

As I said in the latest Ryanair thread, this forum does not exist in a world of its own and individuals and companies will take action to keep their good names.

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1203 times:

I have repsect for any airline that gives me a 19 pound stand-up fare from London to Brussels!

User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1186 times:

Actually, it's all true.

Federal and State law provides specific remedy for those making libelous, defamatory, and/or malicious remarks concerning individuals, organizations, and corporations. The fact that a particular site is hosted overseas offers little protection. I am sure that the owners of this site are aware of this.

I think that is why flamebait posts are of particular concern--and the mods have been actively enforcing their removal. It's a smart move.

Can you sue someone for what they say about you over the internet? Yes.
Will they collect damages? Unlikely.

They are basically nuisance suits but nevertheless must be defended.


User currently offlineCom3205 From Vatican City, joined Jul 2001, 69 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1161 times:

PhilB
Do you mean we can only say how good Ryanair is or you get sued? The initial text is coming from Germany not from the Airliners.net.
Are you paid by Ryanair?


User currently offlineGroholsky From Belgium, joined May 2001, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1133 times:

PhilB,

you have a problem with Belgians ? I can respect that you love Ryanair, but then you should at least understand as you said so nicely that this world is made of different opinions. BTW, I don't think that only in Belgium some people hate Ryanair (see the article in The Telegraaf (Netherlands))...As I can imagine aswell that there are Belgian guys loving Ryanair.

So speaking of maturity....You can maybe also accept different opinions than yours !!!

I don't even want to REstart that old debate...
Ryanair is there and we have to cope with it...that's it !

Good evening all !!!


User currently offlineGroholsky From Belgium, joined May 2001, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1119 times:

Belgium could even sue you, PhilB...hahahahaha

User currently offlineTeva From France, joined Jan 2001, 1871 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1114 times:

Philb, don't you think our belgian riend are more entitled for such an action, with all the posts we have seen when Sabena collapsed ?????
Pointing a group on a national basis is exactly the type of thing that can end in a legal action.....  Innocent



Ecoute les orgues, Elles jouent pour toi...C'est le requiem pour un con
User currently offlineCwapilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 17
Reply 7, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1091 times:

PhilB has a good point, and gets nothing but ignorance as a response. There is a difference between expressing dislike for a company, or reporting personal, negative experiences, or even relaying negative experiences of people you know. It is a completely different thing to spread information that makes serious accusations that can severely damage a company, which are unsubstantiated. People who do so, and the outlets they use to do so, if that outlet takes no steps to prevent it, can be sued for libel or defamation. Even if something is reported in a newspaper, and the paper does not do its homework and check and double check their information, they can be sued...and rightly so.

Is this report credible? Clearly not! For one thing, there are proper channels to go through to report such allegations, which would result in an investigation in order to determine if they are with merit. This hasn't been done here. Also, the extremely poor English grammer used in the statement is telling.

PhilB's point is that this has already happened in one site similar to this, in which people were allowed to run their mouths with no accountability. Why not here? I can talk all I want about how horrible my last trip on X airlines was. However, if I issue a report stating that airline X has serious safety problems and is dangerous, without anything to substantiate it, I stand in violation of the law, even though I may hate airline X. So, this is not a matter of opinion.



Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
User currently offlineCwapilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 17
Reply 8, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1077 times:

My poor English grammAr has lead me to spell grammAr as "grammEr" above...thought I'd point it out myself since most people here who can't argue based on fact, attack the spelling and grammAr of others!  Smile




Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
User currently offlinePhilB From Ireland, joined May 1999, 2915 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1029 times:

Thanks CwaPilot.

The ignorance you point out is precisely what led to the action against Avweb and, by the way, also against some of the subscribers who "published" items which were not only of their own authorship, but were repostings of items found elsewhere.

The definition of "publishing" means it is no defence to claim you were only reposting someone else's post elsewhere, if the content is libelous you perpetrate the libel.

So Com3205 please get your facts straight before "having a go" and, if you had read and UNDERSTOOD my posts on the Ryanair threads you would have realised I do not work for Ryanair, or Groholsky, have any real love for them or their CEO, so please don't talk about maturity if you can't demonstrate it yourself.

Finally, Greg, whilst you are correct about cross border suits, the EU is one entity with regard to civil actions and this site is run from Sweden, the posts came from Belgium, both in the EU. If Ryanair, or any other EU company was minded to take action, they would have to sue in the country where the libel was perpetrated BUT they would be treated as a European entity suing another European company/person and damages would have to be paid exactly as if the action was the result of a libel in a single country - costs and damages being set and payable in the single currency, the Euro.


User currently offlineGroholsky From Belgium, joined May 2001, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 952 times:

Look for the ridiculous in everything, and you will find it.

User currently offline747-451 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2417 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (12 years 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 898 times:

Hey PhilB!!! Whats up!

Actually you make a very concise point. No one should say anything without substantiation, period.


747-451


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photo: How Did This Gridlock Happen Here? posted Sat Jan 31 2004 12:42:16 by BR715-A1-30
What Could Happened Here With This IB 346? (pic) posted Thu Nov 10 2005 14:45:31 by Bongo
Can This Really Happen? Hilarious Video posted Thu Dec 7 2006 23:11:06 by DIJKKIJK
Did This Really Happen To Concorde? posted Wed Nov 29 2006 10:34:01 by Cumulus
Why is this JetBlue plane here? posted Fri Jun 30 2006 02:04:30 by Flyer62
This Doesn't Happen Often posted Thu Nov 17 2005 21:48:00 by UALPHLCS
Did This Really Happen On A BA Flight? posted Wed Mar 9 2005 01:17:10 by JrMafia90
AirTran At MDW - What Could Happen? posted Mon Oct 25 2004 17:37:50 by Jerion
What Could Happen To Star Alliance posted Thu Aug 26 2004 19:28:48 by Ckfred
What Could Happen....? posted Mon Feb 2 2004 15:17:24 by Fourstripe