Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Virgin Atlantic Decide To Stay In India  
User currently offlineAirmale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 378 posts, RR: 1
Posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2029 times:

Great, they're seeking a third flight too, and I hope they can replace BA on the Pakistan routes in the future. Do PIA have unused slots at Heathrow that VS or BMI could utilise with code shares to any Pakistani city?

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Dopson




.....up there with the best!
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineChepos From Puerto Rico, joined Dec 2000, 6220 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2008 times:

Talk about being bipolar- LOL .
First they announce they are going to stop flying to Delhi and now they are going to continue to serve Delhi.
By the way Airmale were did you hear this?
CHEPOS



Fly the Flag!!!!
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2006 times:

Typical VS shenanigans to get more publicity. The quote of the week comes from Shahnawaz Hussain, the Indian Civil Aviation minister who said something along the lines of "If they had simply asked for a third flight in the first place, they could have been awarded one. However, if they resort to blackmail we will call their bluff."

Sure enough, their bluff was called and VS decided to stay in India anyway. Aww...


User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13744 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1954 times:

"Typical VS shenanigans to get more publicity"

I agree, fantastic.

However, is 3 flights a week profitable? They already said 2 flights a week wasn't good enough... or was that "Typical VS sehnanigans"?  Laugh out loud



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1942 times:

Ho ho ho Singapore_Air.VS free markets=no 3rd runway at LHR and VS allowed to fly wherever VS wants to.

User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1943 times:

However, is 3 flights a week profitable?

Probably not, but VS needs to understand that they are guests of Air India to use any of these frequencies. They are not entitled to them as per the bilateral. Branson came up with a brilliant idea to reverse-codeshare these unused frequencies and presented it to Air India, who saw the benefits and agreed to HIS terms. Branson personally was in Delhi to negotiate this agreement and of course pulled a PR prank when he was there too by alleging that BA had denied him boarding to get back to London - the truth was that the flight was oversold and they simply refused to sell him a revenue ticket since they were already sold out. The terms were for 2 initial weekly frequencies, plus a third frequency CONTINGENT upon AI being awarded additional slots at LHR for their own operations. The AI slots never materialized and hence the third frequency didn't materialize. Rather than approach the Indian Government and REQUEST the third frequency anyway, VS instead chose to serve a termination notice and THEN publicize their pullout "because 2 frequencies are not sufficient". Well guess what buddy, if you wanted more frequencies, it might have helped if you had asked.

Air India is perfectly happy to give VS more service on dormant DEL-LHR frequencies (forget about BOM though, that is a fortress that even a Virgin won't be allowed near) as long as they get their codeshare block on the flights as well. In the end it allows AI to gain incremental revenue at virtually zero cost, and more importantly to both VS and AI, it weakens BA's market share to/from India. However, the Indian government will not (nor should they) capitulate and give VS their own rights to fly to India as long as the Indian flag carrier is denied Heathrow access for already awarded but dormant frequencies.


User currently offlineLeezyjet From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 4042 posts, RR: 53
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

According to the VS intranet, they never officially announced that they would stop flying to India, it was just rumoured that they were thinking about it, - don't know how true that is tho.

I can't imagine VS not asking for a third extra flight, it's not like them not to do that, they are usually so full on when they want something.

 Smile



"She Rolls, 45 knots, 90, 135, nose comes up to 20 degrees, she's airborne - She flies, Concorde Flies"
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1910 times:

-437B:

Whats the problem with Heathrow access to AI's 5 dormant frequencies? Does AI want access only between 08:00 - 14:00 hours when Heathrow is a zoo in order to make transatlantic ops feasible?


User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1911 times:

Whats the problem with Heathrow access to AI's 5 dormant frequencies?

Therein lies the problem. AI has FREQUENCIES but no SLOTS to operate them. So even though they have the right to operate the flight, they don't have permission to land the plane at Heathrow, at whatever time of day. That essentially renders the rights useless. India's position is that until SLOTS are allocated to AI that ALLOW them to use these rights to actually operate flights, they will not allow a SECOND British carrier into India, nor will the allow ADDITIONAL services by BA to other Indian cities. Which, IMHO, is a very reasonable condition.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Virgin Atlantic Move To Save Fuel posted Sun Dec 3 2006 22:29:53 by Raventom
Southwest Headquarters To Stay In Dallas posted Wed Jun 21 2006 20:47:36 by KarlB737
Virgin A340-600 To Feature In New Bond Movie posted Thu Jun 15 2006 16:48:49 by Angelairways
Afghan Hijackers Win Right To Stay In U.K posted Wed May 10 2006 21:55:45 by Drinkstrolley
Easyjet To Stay In Ireland posted Mon Aug 8 2005 19:42:26 by SNN27
Virgin Atlantic Service To Nassau...? posted Mon Jun 27 2005 14:44:42 by TransIsland
What Airlines To Avoid In India? posted Mon Mar 7 2005 22:38:19 by Skywatch
Aer Lingus To Stay In Oneworld? posted Mon Nov 1 2004 18:41:59 by CXoneWorld
Virgin Atlantic: Around The World In 80 Hours! posted Wed Dec 17 2003 21:54:03 by EmiratesA345
Virgin Atlantic Looks To 777s, A340s For £1B Order posted Tue Oct 28 2003 09:31:55 by Singapore_Air