Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Qantas/ Air NZ And Star Alliance  
User currently offlineAir Taiwan From Australia, joined Dec 1999, 1518 posts, RR: 4
Posted (12 years 3 months 5 hours ago) and read 2804 times:

Although you never know what's going to happen to the airline industry down under, (re Ansett/Tesna & Kendell/Australiawide), it looks like that Qantas is determined to get 25% of Air NZ pretty soon.

If, Qantas gets the 25% stake in Air NZ, will Air NZ leave Star Alliance?

All opinions welcomed.

Jimmy

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSkippy777 From Netherlands, joined Dec 2001, 816 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 2753 times:

yes, I think so. Air NZ will become join the One world Alliance

User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4575 posts, RR: 41
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 2748 times:

It was suggested yesterday that it would remain pretty much status quo (can't remember where I read that sorry, NZ Herald I think)

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 2745 times:

Airline Business reported that should such a situation occur, the case for ANZ remaining in Star would be very slim...the likely outcome would be for oneworld to bring ANZ aboard.

Furthermore, Rigas Doganis, an Air Transport professor, has predicted that the future will bring changes in many alliances, and that some alliances will eventually break up, as members constantly adjust their strategies to compete more effectively.

Likely to be some interesting times ahead, in the world of alliances!


User currently offlineRmm From Australia, joined Feb 2001, 524 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 2735 times:

Does anyone know what the penalties are for leaving the Star Alliance?
I heard figures between $USD 10 and 50 million.

Rmm


User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4575 posts, RR: 41
Reply 5, posted (12 years 3 months 2 hours ago) and read 2712 times:

Star Alliance severance penalty of NZ$60 million was the number that was floating around last year when Qantas first reared its head into Air NZ's business.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineJAL From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 5090 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2632 times:

Should Qantas succeed in getting 25% of ANZ, expect ANZ to join OneWorld.


Work Hard But Play Harder
User currently offlineQatarAirways From Qatar, joined Sep 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2617 times:

I don't know about this. I have a feeling that there would be quite a fight from the existing Star Alliance members to keep Air NZ in but Aviation is becoming very unpredicatable and so I won't make a bet on that.

I agree with Rigas Doganis' Analysis, BTW he has an excellent book out on the industry The Airline Business in the 21st Century.

Regards,
QatarAirways


User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2613 times:

QR,

That book inspires many of my comments on this board......  Big grin

I've just got my library to order his next book, 'Flying off Course', due out in August.

Cheers


User currently offlineOz777 From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 521 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2574 times:

That is one of the major sticking points about QF taking a cornerstone investment in ANZ.

There are several consequences.

If QF takes the shareholding, and ANZ moves into Oneworld, then it is almost definite that the Star Alliance will start it's own Australian East Coast / Trans Tasman operation.

ANZ has to look at whether it is prepared to lose the traffic feed from the USA it gets it from UA and several other US carriers who do not want to align with QF/AA, in return for a partial feed of Australian traffic - expect QF however to not let too much of this go to ANZ.

There are then the implications for Freedom (makes you wonder why ANZ would ramp up a budget carrier right in the same territory as QF's new budget operation, Australian).

Perhaps Freedom will be the "patsy" - sold off as an "independent" operator to ensure that competition trans-tasman meets the regulatory restraints expected by both the Australian and NZ Competition authorities.

Last but not least, expect a severe back-lash by the members of the ANZ Airpoints scheme who like the flexibility that Star provides, as well as the product. Sadly, Oneworld just does not seem to have the same interchangeability in product, particularly when QF largely mirrors NZ's prime destinations. Never underestimate the power of the populace to exert influence in both the boardroom, and on the majority shareholder!!

Oz777


User currently offlineAir Taiwan From Australia, joined Dec 1999, 1518 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2505 times:

Thanks for all your comments, some of which are quite agreeable.

Air NZ in its own right doesn't provide too much in terms of traffic to other airlines in Star Alliance other than the trans-tasman market. I have the feeling that Star would not do too much to save Air NZ from being bought by Qantas.

Star Alliance airlines, on the other hand, would as some of you have mentioned, would have to start their own airline in Australia to do domestic Australian and trans-tasman flights if Air NZ is to be sold to Qantas. Lets just hope that Star in the same time accepting new members from Korea, Spain and Eastern Europe, does not forget about the Australasian market.

Jimmy

PS Capt Picard, "Flying off course" is our text book at uni for the subject Aviation Economics, quite an expensive book to buy...


User currently offlineJesseycy From New Zealand, joined Aug 2001, 343 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2469 times:

I would say that AirNZ would go into oneworld, simply because it'll make it much easier for Qantas to feed part of its passengers onto AirNZ.

I heard on onenews a few days ago that AirNZ may sell Freedom Air off, maybe to Virgin Blue? It makes sense, they would ease off some of the pressure they'll get from both sides of the Tasman about monopolizing the markets.

But think about it, if AirNZ does go with oneworld, wouldn't that be really bad for Star Allicance Members? Think about their rtw ticket routings. Travelling into the Pacific is going to be so troublesome.... How will they fly from Sydney to Auckland? Via Singapore?


User currently offlineAir Taiwan From Australia, joined Dec 1999, 1518 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2406 times:

Well Thai still does a daily SYD-AKL service, and they do BNE-AKL as well, also UA does MEL-AKL... but then on a much less frequent basis...

Jimmy


User currently offlineTravel From Australia, joined May 2001, 355 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 2350 times:

I don't think that Australia will be neglected with the Star Alliance group, should QF buy a stake in NZ.

It would either be Virgin Blue or a new Australian airline or even possibly both competing against the Qantas/Air New Zealand group.

Should a new airline be established in Australia, it would probably make more economic sense to have this proposed new Australian airline and Virgin Blue as partners. Virgin Blue can remain as a low cost operation and this new airline as the fully serviced with lounges that allow Virgin Blue pax's aswell.



User currently offlineMarara From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 678 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2300 times:

what about NZ staying in * and flying alongside QF in Australia on major city pairs (with a v. limited schedule) for * traffic, this would block SQ from starting a new full service carrier in AUS or DJ going premium and QF would be able to have some control over whats happening.


I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. Jerome K Jerome
User currently offlineTravel From Australia, joined May 2001, 355 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2298 times:

Would it be a good idea for Air New Zealand to be flying within Australia?

Personally I dont think it would be a good idea for NZ fly on domestic routes within Australia only obvious reasons..


User currently offlineORD Boy 2 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 292 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (12 years 2 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2292 times:

why doesnt SIA and LH do a joint bid. I think that ANZ is to valuable to Star since Ansett Australia went under to let QF steal it from Star. Plus what about antitrust violations because QF and ANZ would control 80% of Australia - New Zealand flights. I think it'll be UA-US aussie style

User currently offlineAir Taiwan From Australia, joined Dec 1999, 1518 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2213 times:

why doesnt SIA and LH do a joint bid. I think that ANZ is to (too) valuable to Star since Ansett Australia went under to let QF steal it from Star.

I think it's quite the opposite. Since Ansett is gone now Air NZ has little or no value to Star.

Jimmy


User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2195 times:

Since Ansett is gone now Air NZ has little or no value to Star.

Fact please. Hopefully this only represent your thought. Just because Air NZ financially killed Anstt, so your conclusion towards Air NZ is "worthless"?

Air NZ is still valuable to Star. It helps Star major to feed most of the flights from down under to Europe, North America, 2 of the Star's Major markets. So how can you say that Air NZ is worthless?

Plus it will take times for Star to establish it's own service, with intense networks in the Oceania region. As for Virgin Blue, it's makret share is not compareable to Qantas. I don't see any reason why Star Alliance is willing to lose ANZ.

And if you think Air NZ is worthless, then why not just say I think Air NZ is worthless to Star, so they should be bought by Qantas and join OneWorld?

No intention to attack on personal post, but I don't really understand what makes you think an airline is worthless to a major alliance.

Bigo747/1126.


User currently offlineMarara From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 678 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2193 times:

Flights from 'down under' to Europe can be taken over by SQ/TG flights to the US can go with UA. NZs services to the Pacific islands (and domestic ops) are the only flights that arent really served by another * airline


I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. Jerome K Jerome
User currently offlineQantasAirways From Australia, joined Mar 2001, 1279 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2176 times:

I am pretty sure Air NZ would need to pull out of Star Alliance eventually.

Regards
QantasAirways



Spirit of Australia
User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5351 posts, RR: 11
Reply 21, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2119 times:

Air NZ is the only carrier in Star that has a major presence in the Pacific Islands not including Code Shares, this is quite a large tourist spot down under and if star were to lose Air NZ then they Star would have no major services to this region!

OneWorld have Qantas, although QF don't fly to many destinations with their own aircraft in the Pacific Islands, they code share with carriers like FJ, TN, PH and NF so there is connecting traffic through Australia for OneWorld to this region.


User currently offlineJesseycy From New Zealand, joined Aug 2001, 343 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (12 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2099 times:

Believe me, Star IS needed down under. I have some UA FF miles, and they are sitting here collecting dust! Not enough for a long haul trip, but seems a waste for a short hop within NZ either! You can't even use your miles to exchange for a ticket flying within Australia!

So if Star does loses AirNZ, think about how all those people will fly from Sydney to Christchurch/Wellington! Like I suggested the last time, via Singapore?????


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air NZ Has A Star Alliance Livery! posted Mon Aug 16 2004 18:44:05 by RCS763av
Air India And Star Alliance posted Mon Sep 22 2003 12:59:33 by Swissgabe
Air NZ And Qantas In Cargo Talks posted Tue Dec 21 2004 11:35:12 by 777ER
Varig And Star Alliance posted Thu Oct 5 2006 17:25:32 by Tonytifao
Air One In Star Alliance? posted Wed Aug 30 2006 00:57:26 by Timetable
HP And Star Alliance posted Thu Jun 22 2006 04:58:35 by Boeing 747-311
Varig And Star Alliance posted Sat Jun 10 2006 05:30:54 by Ualcsr
Air China Joins Star Alliance posted Thu May 18 2006 15:03:54 by Chris7217
SAA And Star Alliance Members - Some Questions posted Mon Apr 10 2006 18:08:12 by SA744
Air New Zealand - Star Alliance Scheme posted Sun Mar 19 2006 22:57:39 by PurpleBox