Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airshows Should Be Banned  
User currently offlineCaptjetblast From Argentina, joined Aug 2001, 281 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 2839 times:

At airshows, the planes fly low and fast, just feet above spectators; when one crashes, casualties are counted in tens. It has already happened.




15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSabena 690 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 2832 times:

Yes, it happens from time to time.

It is of course really sad, but why bann an airshow?

Bann spotting too than, because aircrafts are also very low during finals. Ok, they don't do aerobatics, but come...

It is a risk you take, if you are scared, don't go to it.

This is just my opinion.

Regards,
Frederic


User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2805 times:

The U.S. probably has more airshows than anywhere in the world, and they have not had a single airshow spectator fatality in 50 years. Why? Because rules were put in place a long time ago, regulating how and where the planes can make their maneuvers. Europe has implemented the same kind of rules recently, but the ex-Soviet states have not - hence the deaths.

No need to ban airshows, just implement the rules that have been proven elsewhere to significantly enhance security.

Charles


User currently offlineKUGN From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 615 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2803 times:

On US airshows aerobatics are not done above spectators.

User currently offlineTransactoid From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 788 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2792 times:

If it scares you, don't go.

And as everyone has said, the regulations are far tighter in N.American than the break-away Russian rebuplics.


User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13241 posts, RR: 77
Reply 5, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2781 times:

Unsafe shows should be banned yes, as pointed out the US has an excellent safety record due to regulation, the last crowd fatality at a UK show was at Farnborough, in 1952.
We've had airshow crashes since, though never anywhere near the crowd, because the shows, and the display pilots, are properly mangaged.
Did we ban Ocean Liners after the Titanic? No, but safety was increased.
Go to a properly managed show, the biggest risk by far is from a road accident getting to, and leaving the show.
So we now ban cars?


User currently offlineBravo45 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2165 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2736 times:

Ofcourse air shows shouldn''t be banned. Had the security measures been better, we would not have had this tragedy. But banning the airshows is not going to help. Increased security that includes safe shows may be avoiding flying over the spectators and of this ort would help. Air shows are the promoters of aviation. Almost all new aircrafts (except the secret military ones) are launced in airshows. They are a very important part of aviation industry. Nothing is perfect and this was one tragic loss that revealed a hole in the security. We should fill that hole and take measures of any other potential holes that appear dangerous to us and we shouldkeep flying in those limits.

User currently offlineN766ua From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8341 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2667 times:

Well I think flying should be banned. Airplanes fly over thousands of people and when one crashes, casualties are counted in the hundreds. Pfffft.


This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineLeezyjet From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 4042 posts, RR: 53
Reply 8, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2667 times:

"Nothing is perfect and this was one tragic loss that revealed a hole in the security"

Don't think security had anything to do with it, more the rules and regulations the country had in place and the organisation of the event itself and where the crowd line was in relation to the display area.

I'm sure the security was fine. Lots of soliders with guns to protect the a/c etc. They ain't going to stop an accident like that, and would have just been following the rules that had been put in place by the organisers with regard to where the crowd were.



"She Rolls, 45 knots, 90, 135, nose comes up to 20 degrees, she's airborne - She flies, Concorde Flies"
User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4857 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2661 times:

"The U.S. probably has more airshows than anywhere in the world, and they have not had a single airshow spectator fatality in 50 years."

Ramstein. US Air Base, US rules, 70 dead, hundreds burned terribly.


User currently offlineSilverstreak From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 281 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2653 times:

I live in San Francisco and every year we have a "Navy Day". It is great to have the ships in and the accompanying airshow, but I have to say the airshow is risky stuff. I have enjoyed watching all types of aircraft all my life. The only time I dread watching them is when the Blue Angels are in town. The Blue Angels are great and I really do admire the skill of the pilots. I also have no doubt in mind that these pilots have safety on their minds at all times. All that being said the Blue Angels shouldn't fly over San Francisco - one of the most densely populated cities in the U.S. The chances of these guys crashing are very remote, but with tens of thousands of people living under their flight paths, I just feel it is not worth the risk.

User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4575 posts, RR: 41
Reply 11, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2624 times:

Racko - and if I recall correctly, following the Ramstein tragedy, new rules were put in place to ensure spectators were never under the flight line, or in line with it should something go wrong.

Leezyjet - I think he meant security in the wider sense of the word, i.e. safety practices.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days ago) and read 2597 times:

Racko,

Last I checked, Ramstein was in Germany, not the U.S. and if I recall, it was an Italian team performing under European rules.

It was because of the Ramstein incident that Europe decided to upgrade its rules to U.S. standards.

Charles


User currently offlineAviasian From Singapore, joined Jan 2001, 1489 posts, RR: 14
Reply 13, posted (12 years 4 months 2 days ago) and read 2566 times:

By Captjetblast's logic, ban cars from the road . . . you know how many get killed on the road each year?

Ban food, because many people choke to death eating a simple meal at home and in restaurants.

Airshow organisers should relook their safety guidelines and become better acquainted with the constraints of the airshow location and the aircraft's performance before approving a show routine . . . let the show go on, please.

KC Sim
Bangkok


User currently offlineAviatsiya.ru From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (12 years 4 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2528 times:

Europe has implemented the same kind of rules recently, but the ex-Soviet states have not - hence the deaths.

Actually, the Soviet states do have rules.

The Su-27 crash is now a criminal investigation....

As Ukrainians prayed for the dead on a national day of mourning, Prosecutor-General Svyatoslav Pyskun said the pilots had been given a "wrong task" by their chiefs, who had flouted safety rules by allowing them to fly over the crowd. He said four top military officials, including the ex-Soviet state's air force commander, were in detention cells awaiting a court decision on whether to continue to hold them during an investigation into their "serious errors". "It was negligence, military negligence...it was a crime committed by the military," he told a news conference, adding it was so far unknown why the plane had crashed. "There are also signs that there were criminal acts committed by the pilots," he said. Most analysts have said spectators should not have been allowed to sit or stand under the flight path of planes taking part in the air show. They say the twin-engined jet that crashed was flying too low to complete a rolling turn.

If rules are broken, you can't say that rules aren't there, but that those breaking the rules are responsible. Can happen anywhere; America, Europe or CIS


User currently offlineTrident From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 484 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (12 years 4 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2523 times:

The UK has probably the strictest airshow safety regulations in the world. The John Derry DH110 accident at Farnborough in 1952 was a turning point regarding British airshows. It is not true that flying at or over the crowd is banned. However, displays are pre-vetted by an "Airshow Committee" who examine all aspects of the intended routine. What is important are factors such as trajectories and minimum heights for the various manouevers. I attended Farnborough on Sunday and on many occasions aircraft were pointing directly at the crowd but their trajectories would always take them away from the crowd in the event of serious failure or loss of control. Different aircraft are set different parameters depending on their speeds and weights. For example, the Eurofighter's limits would have been very different to those of the Sukhoi Su26 aerobatic 'plane.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Inflight Flight Deck Visits Should Be Banned posted Tue Aug 14 2001 01:33:24 by WhalePilot
Smoking Should Be Banned, Do U Agree posted Mon May 14 2001 22:30:00 by Shabaz
Should Alcohol Be Banned From Flights? posted Mon Dec 22 2003 10:52:32 by Nm19371
Should Alcohol Be Banned In-Flight? posted Sat Nov 17 2001 20:40:33 by Canadi>nBoy
EWR OSL Should Be Important To SK posted Mon Dec 4 2006 06:45:06 by Flybynight
This B737-100 Should Be Preserved... posted Tue Aug 15 2006 14:12:25 by UK_Dispatcher
Heathrow "should Be Phased Out" posted Mon May 29 2006 10:03:57 by Superhub
Some Pax Should Be Taken Outside And Whipped! posted Sat May 20 2006 08:14:34 by Aerofan
Concorde Noise Should I Be Thankful Or I Miss It posted Sat Mar 25 2006 01:27:45 by 747400sp
1st B777LR Should Be Just Touching Down At MAN posted Sun Feb 26 2006 10:09:34 by RobK