Hypermike From United States of America, joined exactly 14 years ago today! , 1001 posts, RR: 5 Posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 820 times:
Has anyone seen these ads yet? They're impressive.
It starts out with guys throwing seats out of the airplane and the voice-over asking "Why in the world would an airline remove rows of seats from its planes?" Then they pan through the cabin when the voice says "OH, that's why..."
Purdue Cadet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 2, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 608 times:
The commercial mentioned by Hypermike is also available online at American's website. They also have some new print ads,, but I've noticed that the weekly ad in Newsweek doesn't have a picture of the new arrangement. You'd think that they'd want to show it off, but the ads are all words.
ORD From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1371 posts, RR: 1 Reply 3, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 581 times:
I would not call it "impressive marketing" (unless you are talking about the actual execution of the ads). While what American is doing is great for the consumer, they are simply following United's lead in removing rows of seats. The market leader in this initiative is clearly United. Let's hope Delta and some of the others follow along.
CannedSpam From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 4, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 582 times:
The leader in this initiative was United? I'd hardly call giving extra leg room in only a few rows on UA vs AA giving extra room in all rooms a "leader's" concept. Yes, it is true that UA put the idea out first, but it is a poor product in comparisons to the product AA has put out. If United was so concerned about becoming a industry leader by using this concept, then why not provide more leg room to all the passengers rather just the "elite" who have to fight over the precious few allocated per aircraft? But, as the ad says..."On American, Coach Has More Class."
LH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 55 Reply 5, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 576 times:
I have to agree with CannedSpam (interesting name by the way). United has effectively provided 4 classes. They took one row of seats out for a few rows. So they have creäted a 'Premium Economy'. While American has taken three rows out for the entire coach, similar concept, grander scale.
« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
FlyPNS1 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 6274 posts, RR: 24 Reply 6, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 569 times:
While many are impressed with American's decision to remove seats, Gordon Bethun, CEO of Continental called them a "short-term fad that is only a guise to reduce capacity by airlines with mediocre service." Ouch!!! Seems he's not so impressed.
Purdue Cadet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 7, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 568 times:
In addition to what CannedSpam has said, American is not following United... Plans for this renovation have been underway for 6 months... since before United announced Economy Plus. By the way, Delta has said that they do not intend to follow suit.
UA744Flagship From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 8, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 555 times:
While I do agree with the rest that AA did not copy UA's idea, only derived it, I would like to clarify that Economy Plus --in addition-- is a bit more of a premium product than AA's new coach. Whereas AA touts that A/C will have up to 36" of legroom, the reality is that only F-100s will have this much (since removing to rows is a big deal with such a small aircraft). Only a little bit over half (58% of AA's fleet) will have a pitch of 34" or more (the only more is the 36" pitch on F-100s). The press release discreetly mentions that the rest of the planes will have only "above the standard pitch of 31 inches". This means that some aircraft could only be upgraded to a measley 32" (which Delta has on its 757s already). "When the project is complete, about 58 percent of American’s coach seats will have a seating pitch of 34 inches or more – and about 98 percent of coach seats will have seat room greater than today’s industry standard". I have even heard that 777s will have only an improvement of 2" - from 31" to 33".
Economy Plus pitch is half split between 35"/36". The near-100 (or is it more now?) strong 757 fleet has had for quite a while now 36" Economy Plus seats.
However, I do applaud AA for having the guts to give room to each and every passenger -- especially on international routes (What was UA thinking -- Economy Plus would be even more effective on Int'l flights). I am sure that next time I'll fly on AA I will enjoy the "class" of coach.
I just wanted to clarify that: a) Econ Plus, although a limited product account for only about a fourth of seat capacity on each *DOMESTIC/N. American* plane, provides more room. The minimum pitch for it is 35" -- half even have 36"; b) AA new Coach has about 60% of A/C 34" or more (the more being 36" on F-100s), and roughly 40% being between 31" and 34". c) This accounts to an average of about 2.25" or so pitch difference between the two "new" classes.; d) NEVERTHELESS -- any improvement of legroom in Coach is to be applauded!
N949WP From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2000, 1437 posts, RR: 1 Reply 9, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 559 times:
Seat pitch increased to 33" on AA 777's Y-class? Well, that's at best on par with what they previously had on the MD11's for long-haul flights. I've flown AA MD11's trans-Pacific numerous times, and immediately noticed the loss of seat pitch when they switched to 777's on my most recent trip. In this case, I won't characterize the increase in pitch as any kind of improvement, but merely giving back what was previously robbed.
ORD From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1371 posts, RR: 1 Reply 10, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 537 times:
Sorry to tell you, but you are incorrect. My old college roommate works in American's marketing department. What they did was a direct response to United's Economy Plus. It was not even a topic of discussion at American previously. Heck, you said it yourself: this was in the works for 6 months. Well, if the program was first brought up 6 months ago, let's see -- that's when Economy Plus was announced! Of course, it may have leaked to American a bit early, but this is clearly competition benefitting the consumer at its finest. It doesn't matter who started it, those who fly coach all win.
Silverstreak From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 281 posts, RR: 1 Reply 11, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 533 times:
My last flight on AA (SFO-DFW) was sheer torture. At dinner a group of pax struggled to arrange themselves to be able to eat. We all sort of laughed at ourselves at how we had to position ourselves to be able to eat! I felt as we had become "canned spam"!Any improvement will be a relief.
FlyAA757 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1002 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 529 times:
The old interiors on the S80s and 100s were really uncomfortable, but the new ones somehow made the same pitch much more bareable.
I sat in the mock ups at both LGA and ORD about 2 weeks ago, and was very impressed. The difference is really noticeable. The mock ups have a before and after. Im shocked that management didnt use old style seats to be more dramatic, but the effect is still pretty great. I cant wait. This will be nice for ALL coach passengers.
Flying on a Q fare on UA is a terrible experience. You have to walk forever to the back and you feel almost second class.
ORD From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1371 posts, RR: 1 Reply 15, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 524 times:
American did it better for who? For the rest of coach, yes it is better. But they make up such a small percentage of revenue for the airlines. United does it better for the frequent flyers and the ones who pay full fare -- they get MORE room on UA than AA (up to 36" on UA vs. 32"-34" on AA). The research said that the important flyers wanted a difference between themselves and the rest of coach, and on UA they get it. That's how an airline makes money and stays in business in the long run -- by pleasing the customers who mean the most to the airline. If I'm a frequent flyer or one paying full fare, I'll take UA over AA other things being equal because of the extra room.
GeorgeInSFO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 16, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 528 times:
The real issue is what does the full fare coach passenger get? Nothing, and this seat pitch thing is VERY close to NOTHING so far.
The huge differences in coach pricing really needs to be addressed. I also think F and C class are really too high for what you get.
Could be that if fares were more fair, there would be less resentment among passengers and more passengers would opt for a better standard of service. I think the complaints on this are valid and the airlines should really listen and make more adjustments.
PresRDC From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 650 posts, RR: 1 Reply 17, posted (13 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 516 times:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't TWA come up with this idea several years back with its Comfort Class? It has been discontinued, but the idea was to give more legroom by removing seats. Did UAL or AA do anything that different?
BTW, if you want to experience discomfort at its finest, try Delta's 737-200 coach seating. I am only 5'8", but I can barely fit. The 45 min. flight from South Bend to Cincinnati is absolutely unbearable.
Also, despite all that Virgin offers the economy passenger, its seat pitch is riduculous. As i said in an earlier post, it was so bad, I felt compelled to get to the airport 6 hours on the return fligth to make absolutely sure that I got an exit row (which I did). Ironically, TWA's 767s had the best economy seat pitch that I've experienced, but, of course, the rest of the service was sub-standard.