Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
QF/ANZ - No Way  
User currently offlineORD Boy 2 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 324 posts, RR: 1
Posted (13 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1246 times:

there is no way this wioll happen ANZ is to valuable to star now that ansett is gone plus SIA still owns part of it. Expect LH and/or SIA to make a new bid and ANZ will take it. QF just wants ANZ for prestige only. QF and ANZ didnt work together well before, why will it now

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineQANTASforever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1229 times:

Uh, QANTAS does nothing for 'prestige'. It all comes down to $$$$
And just because ANZ is in star alliance means absolutely sh**all when it comes to airline ownership. E.g: Canadian Airlines.

If Qantas plans to invest in ANZ then there has to be a monetary benefit.


User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2406 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (13 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1219 times:

As I have mentioned before Qantas has previously held a stake in Air New Zealand, long before the days of 'Alliances'. In the eighties the two airlines had extensive codesharing and commercial cooperation over the Tasman. To survive globally it is a logical regional alliance.

User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4652 posts, RR: 37
Reply 3, posted (13 years 10 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1212 times:

A few points need to be made (although I am 100% in agreement with your topic line).

* SIA's shareholding in NZ is very small - around 5% and they only have one seat on the board now.

* QF doesn't want NZ for prestige - it wants it because it eliminates one of its major regional competitors, and will increase the number of people arriving in Australia on Qantas or part-Qantas-owned airlines.

* QF was one of the airlines that help a shareholding back in the TEAL days. The relationship was not always amicable - Qantas were accused of lumping TEAL with older aircraft - and it was joked that TEAL stood for 'Take Electras And Like it'. Qantas's share was later acquired by the government, I believe.

* When NZ was privatised in the early 1990s, Qantas bought a shareholding (I believe it was around the 10% mark). This was sold for competition reasons in 1997, following NZ's 50% purchase of Ansett Australia. I cannot recall the extent of cooperation between the two airlines in this period, but I do believe there may have been codesharing.

* An LH/SQ combined bid would be very interesting - in fact I was intending to post that exact idea later on today, so it looks like you have beaten me to it. Conceivably, LH could buy say 15%, and SQ increase its share to 20%, reaching the 35% foreign airline ownership. Perhaps they could even get around the 35% foreign airline ownership cap by setting up a holding company, and having that company buy 49% of NZ, the cap on foreign ownership. Perhaps someone who has read and has an understanding of the acts controlling foreign ownership of Air NZ could tell us whether such a set up would be allowable or not.

* Slightly off topic, in today's Australian Financial Review, there was an article regarding Qantas's foreign ownership caps (which are the same as Air NZ's - a foreign airline can hold no more than 25%, foreign airlines can hold no more than 35% in total, and foreign companies can hold no more than 49% in total). Qantas believes that unless this cap is lifted, it may not be able to capitalise sufficiently to support its fleet modernisation plans. Apparently the management at Qantas believe that foreign ownership can exceed 50% without jeopardising Bilateral Air Services agreements, provided the company's head office is in Australia, and the board is primarily Australian. They are apparently lobbying the government to accept this as the definition of 'Predominantly Australian controlled and operated'. The Government is expected to announce its decision on the matter near the end of August.

So, it looks like there could be interesting times ahead. Air NZ will announce its new domestic fare structures tomorrow - I am very interested to hear what
they will be offering.

One last thing - did this really deserve a new thread, when you said pretty much the same thing in another?


"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineJesseycy From New Zealand, joined Aug 2001, 343 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 10 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 1185 times:

Somehow, I don't think that SQ would be too keen on this AirNZ stake thing again, after losing a couple million dollars......

QF/ANZ actually makes sense, it will really strengthen these two carriers, and bring a much bigger network to AirNZ. But the trade for these advantages will be the monopoly of fares over both sides of the Tasman. But IMO, I think it'll be worth it.

And besides, once QF/Anz do partner together and join oneworld, I'm pretty sure that Star Alliance will do something about the lack of their presence in this region..... (As I said in the other post)

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
"NO WAY BA/AA" posted Fri Jun 1 2001 02:02:10 by PanAm747
"No Way BA/AA" posted Sun Apr 15 2001 08:03:45 by Aio86
No Way BA/AA? posted Thu Jan 11 2001 21:41:55 by Zsx81
SIA: LHR - Usa? No Way! posted Sat Dec 2 2000 09:53:51 by Singapore_Air
NO WAY BA/KLM! posted Thu Sep 21 2000 20:00:59 by B737-700
"No Way BA/AA" posted Thu Jun 22 2000 19:35:16 by 747orDie
Air New Zealand, Whey Hey Or No Way? posted Mon May 15 2000 20:47:33 by Dash84q
"NO WAY BA/AA" posted Thu Mar 30 2000 05:40:35 by Turboprop
"No Way BA/AA" ? posted Mon Oct 25 1999 04:24:22 by Dazed767
No way BA/AA on VA acft posted Tue Feb 16 1999 12:15:08 by V jet