Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
TWA 800  
User currently offlineChucknSteph From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 30 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 962 times:

I was wondering how many other people might be thinking of the similarites that flight 800 suffered:
Like Air India 182, in flight catostrophic failure, due to the forward cargo door;
United 811 structural failure in flight due to the forward cargo door;
Pan Am break up, due to bomb blast that ruptured the forward cargo door
All of these had radar blips preceding the events (the cargo door and aircraft skin falling away) All of these having #3 Engine FOD from cargo, etc,; All of these having starboard side wing FOD penetration damage; All of these aircraft "tear and peeling" effect starting at the starboard side station 680-station 741 just above the forward cargo door. All of these were -100's or 200's over 15,000 hours, that had a history of forward cargo door cam and electrical lock switch faults.
It just makes one stop and think, if TWA 800 may have had a cargo door jettison in flight.
Agree or Disagree?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBrick From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 1589 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (14 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 872 times:

There is no evidence to suggest that.

What the evidence does indicate, is that vapors in the center fuel tank were ignited. How is still unclear and may never be known.

The likely theory, according to Jim Hall himself, is that high voltage was sent into the fuel tank via a short in a bundle of wires that also contained low voltage wires that went into the fuel tank. Basically, the high voltage wire somehow sent a jolt down the low voltage wire and kaboom. There are some theories of how this can happen, but nothing has been reproduced in the lab yet.

Two things that definately did not cause TWA 800 to go down: a missile (sabotage) or something falling off of the plane.

Mark



A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man...
User currently offlineBeckaru From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 138 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 9 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 862 times:

TWA 800 was shot down, the evidence shows it and the facts remain no matter how much the government tries to cover it up and make themselves look like fools.

User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10804 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (14 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 851 times:

TWA shot down or not, there still might be some clues that might suggest that.
But on this forum I don´t think there is someone who can say that it was 100% this or that what caused that tragic accident. If it really was a rocket (I don´t think it was), sooner or later there will be a leak in the US army.
What is 100% sure is that there was never any evidence of a cargo door failure, like "Brick" writes. The popular theory is that fuel tank explosion. Strange thing anyway. One thought I have: why did I never hear something like that from cars. If a fuel tank in a ultra high tech machine like a Boeing 747 can explode, there must be dozens of exploding car fuel tanks every day somewhere in this world.

And one correction in your list, ChucknSteph: Air India flight 182 was destroyed by a bomb (like the Lockerbie-Jumbo). Not by a faulty cargo door.


User currently offlineAcvitale From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 922 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (14 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 840 times:

It was either the fuel tank or a missle.

I discounted the missle theory until someone pointed out testimony of an Air Nat'l Guard flight crew witness statements, 120+ witnesses on the ground, and the oxidizers on the seats. If it was a missle we will never know it. The navy was testing the Aegis missle cruiser to admit it shot down another pax plane would have killed the program which was already under congressional scrutiny and was having significant software problems.

(Prior cases of US nacy shooting down civilian airliners Iran Air A300 and I think a Spanair DC-9)


User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 47
Reply 5, posted (14 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 840 times:

Someday, probably after everyone involved is dead, the now sealed documents will be declassified: The CIA killed JFK, Bill Clinton will admit to how he screwed us all, and was laughing his ass off the whole time, and that TWA 800 was shot down or sabotoged.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
12 Years Ago Tonight - TWA 800 posted Thu Jul 17 2008 10:00:46 by Contrails
Confusion Over TWA 800 Reconstruction Pic posted Wed Dec 26 2007 16:45:55 by Daron4000
TWA 800 10 Yrs Ago Today, 7/17 posted Mon Jul 17 2006 18:49:54 by Richierich
Program Alert: CNN About TWA 800 3 Hour Program posted Sun Jul 16 2006 01:57:33 by Boeinglover24
TWA 800 & AL 981 posted Sat Jul 15 2006 08:28:55 by Arecibo
10 Years Ago This Month - TWA 800 Crash posted Mon Jul 3 2006 21:17:08 by 747400sp
TWA 800 On N24 Fernsehen (TV) posted Sat May 13 2006 13:49:38 by TS-IOR
TWA 800 Question posted Sat Mar 18 2006 21:15:05 by Womack17
Book About TWA 800 posted Thu Aug 25 2005 15:22:12 by BrunoSBGR
9th Anniversary -- Crash Of TWA 800 Today posted Sun Jul 17 2005 15:05:33 by GoldenArgosy