Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
If You Could Move Your Local Airports Location  
User currently offlineFly_yhm From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 1681 posts, RR: 10
Posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1878 times:

If you could move your local airports location where would you move it too and why?

My 2 local airports yhm I would move down to the Harbor front in Hamilton to replace all the steel mills and it would avoind hearing the people in Ancaster Ontario Bitch about it. Also I like waterfront airports the are neat such as BOS. Also it would be closer to the downtown and better highways.

YYZ to the otherside of toronto near Oshawa or Whitby. So its farther from YHM.


Where will you spend eternity? He,s more real then you think!!!!!
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1862 times:

Move MCI to the SOUTH side of town.

User currently offlineAC340 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 337 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1834 times:

As a fan of spotting, and as a Mississauga resident, I think it would be absolutely horrible if they were to move YYZ to another location, like Whitby or Oshawa. Keep it where it is...let's move Hamilton closer to the city instead of out in the middle of nowhere. I think by the water front would be good, but we do need the steel industry. So I say, keep them where they are.

User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1770 times:

Without a doubt, I'd move San Diego's airport to the current site of the Marine Corps Air Station at Miramar.

Aaron G.


User currently offlineAsgeirs From Iceland, joined May 2001, 516 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1628 times:

What a silly question...

Of course I would move my local airport (KEF - Keflavik, Iceland) right into my backyard to eliminate the 50km strip of road that today lies between my home and the airport.  Nuts



Reykjavik Aviation Photography - Just bring the aircraft to us and we'll photograph them! :-)
User currently offlineMoekha786 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1624 times:

ORD is smack dab right in the middle of the chicago metro area, the city is east, and the nimby's are west, it is completely surrounded. It would have been perfect if it was in the south side of town by the lake, that way there would be no nimby's to cry, half of the flight paths would go over the lake, and the south side of chicago wouldn't be such a ghetto.

User currently offlineN949WP From Hong Kong, joined Feb 2000, 1437 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1602 times:

For Hong Kong (HKG), it's a no-brainer --- MOVE IT BACK TO KAI TAK !!!!

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Daryl Chapman



'949


User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2174 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1596 times:

Well, my local airport is ATL, and it's fine. HOWEVER, the airport I grew up pasted to the fence of watching aircraft is Farmington, NM (FMN). If it were my choice, I'd close both FMN and DRO (Durango, CO) and build one airport between the two cities (45 miles apart) to serve both communities as they've discussed for nearly 25 years. Then there'd be some real action.

Travis


User currently offlineMicstatic From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 787 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1554 times:

Move MCO to the north side of Orlando.

Expand the runway(despite the NIMBY's) in HVN ( New Haven, CT) so it can increase its service.



S340,DH8,AT7,CR2/7,E135/45/170/190,319,320,717,732,733,734,735,737,738,744,752,762,763,764,772,M80,M90
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5231 posts, RR: 21
Reply 9, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1514 times:

STL is fine where it is though I would love to see it expand northwards so we could have four paralells of which 3 could be used simultaneously. Should have the 3rd one up an running in a couple of years.


The best IFE: A window seat and a good book.
User currently offlineAA-STL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1502 times:

That would be SWEET! it would run into boeing tho right?

User currently offlineDripstick From Canada, joined Dec 2001, 2364 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1491 times:

Fly_yhm, you're forgetting about the NIMBYs in Burlington/Aldershot who would have a large cow over that noise!

You could only approach from the east or west due to the bridge and escarpment.

Would be fun to watch though.



What's another word for thesaurus?
User currently offlineLeftypilot79 From United States of America, joined Jun 2002, 455 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1480 times:

I agree Trvlr,

San Diego would become San Diego Miramar International Airport. Let the fighter jets go train down at KSAN.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


aaron m


User currently offlineSpark From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 431 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1474 times:

I think that we should have built a large airport serving the Bay Area in Pleasanton-Dublin area, which is about 30 miles from San Francisco, in the 80's. It wasn't all that developped, and would have offerred room for expansion. It also has good weather, and wouldn't have weather related delays. (Moving it further east would cause fog delays).
Unfortunately, the area has since developped, and NIMBY folks would have a point. There currently isn't a good place to put an airport built specifically to serve the entire bay area. SFO and SJC have limited expansion possiblities, and flight paths need to be limited due to noise concerns.
If I were elected Bay Area Airport Zhar, I would expand OAK into the main airport in the region, and have SFO and SJC become the regional airports (kind of like SJC and OAK now).
Of course another option is to have Travis AFB become a large international airport (like Narita), becoming California's primary longhaul airport. (Ain't gonna happen, but it's a thought).


User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (12 years 4 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1422 times:

ATL is in a fairly good location, good access to three Interstate highways (I-75, I-85, I-285), rapid transit line that goes all the way to the northside of town, and it's centrally located in the region. On the other hand, the airport is not ideally situated for a lot of people. When the airport originally opened, the majority of people in the Atlanta area lived in the city itself, or in one of the trolley suburbs like Inman Park, Druid Hills, Virginia-Highlands, Decatur, and East Point; so the airport really wasn't too far from the majority of the residents of Atlanta. Since the 1970s, the population growth has been primarily concentrated in the northern suburbs of Atlanta (north Fulton County, Cobb County, Gwinnett County, Forsyth County, and Cherokee County) and areas that were being considered for the location of a replacement airport ended up where all this development sprung up. When a site in northern Fulton County was being considered in the late 60s and early 70s for the airport, the area was still rural farmland; today, the area is full of neighborhoods, office parks, and retail stores. One of the original sites proposed for the Atlanta Airport back in the 1920s was to the southwest of town, but was not considered because of a large hill on the site, and the navigation technology was not up to the challenge. The site of the former Naval Air Station in Chamblee was considered as well, but the government in DeKalb County got a hold to the land before the City of Atlanta could, and is now the current site of Peachtree-DeKalb Airport. There really isn't a suitable site in the Metro area for the airport, other than some of the smaller airfields in Atlanta. The decision to build it in Hapeville was the best decision that could have been made, since basically, only a minimum amount of work was require to establish it originally.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
If You Could Own Your Own Airport... posted Sat Apr 26 2003 02:57:51 by Douglas DC-9
What If You Could Start Your Own Airline? posted Sat Aug 7 1999 03:44:22 by Dc-9-10
If You Could Meet The Head Of Technical Operations posted Thu Nov 9 2006 05:06:50 by HPAEAA
If You Could Start New US Airways Routes? posted Thu Oct 14 2004 17:37:03 by US A333 PIT
What Plane Would You Fly If You Could Be A Pilot? posted Thu Apr 29 2004 10:33:18 by 777ER
If You Could Go Back Into Time..... posted Wed Apr 21 2004 19:23:27 by CougarAviator
If You Could Fly Any Of These A/c, Which Would U? posted Tue Apr 13 2004 17:53:31 by Pe@rson
What If You Could Change An Airport Code? posted Thu Mar 18 2004 11:37:56 by KEno
If You Could Bring An Airline Back posted Wed Mar 10 2004 14:43:35 by ToBEYwithMEA
If You Could Have Any Airplane...... posted Tue Dec 2 2003 04:20:42 by Cancidas