Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air China Banned From Flying 747-200s To S. Korea!  
User currently offlineBobcat From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 0 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2795 times:


AP News:

Air China banned from flying Boeing 747-200s to Busan in South Korea
Sun Aug 11, 3:06 AM ET

SEOUL, South Korea - The South Korean government said Sunday it has banned Air China from flying Boeing 747-200s to the southern city of Busan, where one of the Chinese flag-carrier's jumbo jets crashed in April.



"We notified Air China that we have banned the same type of plane involved in the crash from flying the same route," the Transportation Ministry said in a news release.

Ministry officials said the Chinese airline can fly other types of plane to Busan.

On April 15, an Air China Boeing 747-200 with 166 people on board crashed into a mountain while trying to land in rain at an airport near Busan. The accident left 122 people dead and six others missing. Thirty-eight people survived.

The plane's Chinese pilot, 31-year-old Wu Xinlu, told investigators that his plane experienced no mechanical problems before the crash, which prompted South Korean officials to focus on human error.

The two "black boxes," which contain flight data and cockpit voice exchanges, were recovered.

South Korean officials plan to hold a public hearing in Seoul this month before concluding their investigation of the crash. Final results of the investigation would not be available before the end of this year, they said.

Air China is one of three major international carriers based in the country. The crash was Air China's first fatal one since its establishment in 1988


9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSwissgabe From Switzerland, joined Jan 2000, 5266 posts, RR: 33
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2776 times:

As far as I remember it was a B767-200 which crashed near Pusan Airport and not a B747-200, just btw ...


Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
User currently offlineCathay Pacific From Australia, joined May 2000, 1864 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2767 times:

huh? Wasn't it a 767 that crashed!

http://www.airdisaster.com/cgi_bin/view_details.cgi?date=04152002&airline=Air+China



cathay pacific, now you're really flying
User currently offlineBobcat From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2760 times:

Link to the original AP story:
Air China banned from flying Boeing 747-200s to Busan in South Korea
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020811/ap_wo_en_po/skorea_china_crash_investigation_1

Did AP make an error? I also recall that it was a CA Boeing 767 that crashed in Korea, NOT a 747-200.... what's going on here?


User currently offlineBobcat From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2747 times:

I think AP did make an error in its report.

This is what I read in The Korea Herald.(English newpaper in Korea) It said 767s are banned.

http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2002/08/12/200208120040.asp

Seoul demands compensation for Air China crash

The amount of compensation money for victims from April's Air China crash in Gimhae, South Gyeongsang Province, is presumed to reach over 200 million won per person, government officials said yesterday.

The Ministry of Construction and Transportation said that they demanded Air China pay a realistic sum in compensation money for the victims, to which the Chinese side agreed in principle.

Air China officials reportedly told the Korean officials they will propose adequate amounts of compensation by putting enthusiastic efforts into negotiations with bereaved families and taking under consideration cases in the past such as the Korean Air crash in Guam several years ago.

The compensatory fund will include consolatory money, funeral expenses and others, the ministry officials said.

The amount will also reflect each victim's age group and income level, they said.

After the 1997 crash in Guam, Korean Air paid 275 million won in compensation to each victim.

The ministry also notified Air China of a ban on Boeing 767 airplanes owned by the airline from flying to Gimhae Airport.


2002.08.12




User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2738 times:

Whats the problem with the 762 ??

User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2640 times:

it doesnt make any sense to ban a type on aircraft flying on certain routes. if the koreans are worried that human error caused the crash and if it is true it must relate to the training of the airline. and no matter what a/c type air china is flying, they are under the same training department of the airline. right? correct me if i am wrong. but this just doesnt make sense.

User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10765 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2615 times:

It´s called politics, and that is too often like little boys playing, not big boys making wise decisions. Red China and South Korea are no friends.

User currently offlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1304 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2553 times:

There's been a huge mix-up in the reporting, the media have got it completely wrong!! It was a 767-200 that crashed not a 747-200!

I assume the 767-200 has been banned but it doesn't make any sense. I have no idea why they would ban an aircraft from landing in Busan, despite the crash. It's probably got something to do with politics...

Hkg82.


User currently offlineClipperNo1 From Germany, joined May 1999, 672 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2510 times:

I think it could makes sense if you replace Air China with China Airlines...but I'm not sure.


"I really don't know one plane from the other. To me they are just marginal costs with wings."� Alfred Kahn, 1977
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Peru's Aero Continente Banned From Flying To U.S. posted Fri Apr 23 2004 13:20:07 by LatinAviation
British Airways Flying 747-400 To Denver (DEN) Now posted Mon Jan 6 2003 21:20:56 by BA
Air France Still Operating 3-class 747-200s? posted Tue Jan 22 2002 17:18:55 by TR
Iran Air To Lease 744 From Air China posted Fri Apr 21 2006 20:07:53 by Amax1977
Report: Air China To Lease 2 A380 From Ilfc posted Thu Feb 17 2005 19:22:13 by PANAM_DC10
Air China To Buy 20 A330-200 Aircraft From Airbus posted Thu Jan 27 2005 02:19:25 by Jacobin777
Flying Air China Longhaul - What To Expect? posted Fri Dec 10 2004 22:20:48 by Aussie_
Do Air China Fly To SHA Or BJS From Salzburg? posted Sat Sep 21 2002 16:37:09 by Karliboy
Air China To Resume Pakistan Flights From Feb 21st posted Wed Feb 6 2002 15:49:58 by GF-A330
Air Canada 747-400 To China posted Thu Feb 1 2001 01:25:41 by Polaris