Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could EasyJet Buy LCY Airport...  
User currently offlineRichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3745 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 11 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1543 times:

.....because they seem to like spending at the moment.

Or is it regulatory not possible?

They could fly planes from GVA, MUC, LYS. CDG, AMS and other airports and really upset current flag carriers that currently fly into LCY.

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSaab2000 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2001, 1610 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (11 years 11 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1506 times:

1. There is very limited parking at LCY
2. The Boeing 737 is not capable of landing or taking off from a 1099 meter runway, at least not loaded.
3. The Boeing 737 cannot fly the steep approach that exists in LCY.

This will not happen unless HUGE changes occur at this airport.




smrtrthnu
User currently offlineTurbulence From Spain, joined Nov 1999, 963 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (11 years 11 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1497 times:

I'm afraid it is not possible. Please someone confirm, but LCY has very strict noise regulations. Most airplanes flying there are 146s/RJs and some modern turboprops. As far as I know, although 737s are "stage 3" engined, they do not meet the very limited exigences of London City Airport.

Unless... wait a minute:
I don't know if any smaller ones of the CFM56 series jets (are these ones exactly?) would meet these regulations, but this would mean EZY placing his next 100 unit order to A319s/320s, and leave the 737s for the Swiss subsidiary.

Hey, I must admit that at first it shocked me, and I found your thought interesting. Then I remembered the noise regulations. And this made me think of the tax exemption for CFM equipped 32Xs in Switzerland thanks to low noise and exhaust emissions.

I must confess I made a fantastic mix of suppositions, but the way U2 is expanding fleet and destinations... Who knows?

Low low fares... directly to city center instead of 55-mile away Lutton? Hmmm... if Stelios is reading this... who knows!!!

Έλα, ρε Στέλιο, κάνε κάτι μεγάλο και εντιποσιατικό!!!

Best turbulences


User currently offlineRichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3745 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 11 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1486 times:

I did not suggest that they flew B737s into LCY Saab 2000

User currently offlineTurbulence From Spain, joined Nov 1999, 963 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (11 years 11 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1491 times:

Hey, is the runway really that short?

I'm afraid that no medium airplanes can fly there, then...

What a pity!


User currently offlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4399 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 11 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1455 times:

Yes, they can buy LCY, but they can't fly to/from it.

User currently offlineEugdog From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2001, 518 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 11 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1439 times:

They should operate from Stansted - much better for location and railway links - there is direct train line from Liverpool street station (still gotta take a shuttle bus to LCCY from the train station) - Liverpool Street station is right in the heart of the financial district so it is great for business travelors!!!!

User currently offlineSaab2000 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2001, 1610 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (11 years 11 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1403 times:

RichardW,

Sorry if I offended you with my short answers. The reason I mentioned the 737s is that that is all the Easyjet operates. This is one of the reasons a low-cost airline like Easyjet works. Anyway, your idea is not bad. I think that companies like this are going to play an increasingly large role in aviation and that the ones which don't adapt will die.

Also, I was wrong. The runway is 1199 metes, not 1099 meters. Anyway, still too short for anything but really small planes. This is not the biggest problem though. The bigger problem is the steep approach.

In order for Easyjet to operate at LCY they would have to either add another fleet or have it operated for them. Both of these things go against the Easyjet philosophy.

Jim

PS - I was in LCY today on the Saab 2000!! As usual, an exciting approach!



smrtrthnu
User currently offlineGo Canada! From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 2955 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (11 years 11 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1369 times:

They are highly likely to operate from stansted, easyjet have stated that Go! will be fully merged into easyjet as since easyet is the larger and older partner the GO! name will disappear.

Sinces its going to be diffifcult to transfer everything over to luton(and why would you?) it can only make sense to stay at STN, especially since it wont cost anything, if they move it costs them money.



It is amazing what can be accomplised when nobody takes the credit
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Midway Could Be SWA's Busiest Airport By 2007 posted Thu Dec 22 2005 02:17:18 by AirportPlan
BAA To Buy Budapest Airport posted Sat Dec 10 2005 01:15:47 by Dean
Could Southwest Buy The US Shuttle? posted Wed Sep 15 2004 05:46:49 by Sllevin
If You Could Own Your Own Airport... posted Sat Apr 26 2003 02:57:51 by Douglas DC-9
Could EasyJet Compete With Virgin Blue In .... posted Wed Aug 28 2002 15:05:47 by Richardw
Deal Done -- Easyjet Buy Go posted Thu May 16 2002 10:03:45 by Gordonroxburgh
Could Lufthansa Buy Bmi? posted Sat May 4 2002 01:04:02 by Racko
Could An Airline Build Or Buy An Entire Airport? posted Fri Jul 22 2005 18:00:40 by AAgent
Could Capital City Airport Support Service To TPA? posted Tue Oct 10 2006 18:18:08 by JetBlueGuy2006
Emirates Could Buy A340-600's As A Stop Gap! posted Fri Oct 6 2006 03:11:12 by Bringiton