Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CX "Considers" Sjchkg  
User currently offlineAa777flyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1959 times:

I spoke to a friend on mine the other day who is a Manager for the SJC airport. He told me CX is "very interested" in starting SJCHKG service. They have been to visit the airport at least twice. They would use a 747-400 for the route, (once 30L is open again). This would be an awesome sight!

26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5482 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1892 times:

It seems pretty likely if you ask me. SJC has a large software market and HKG has a large business market. Also, AA has a decent hub at SJC so there would probably be connecting pax.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5198 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1894 times:

How would this affect CX's SFO flights? Is there enough regional/connecting traffic in the Bay area to support both services?


Next up, STL-ATL-MSY-ATL-STL
User currently offlineSjc>sfo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1896 times:

I was under the impression that SJC was mainly an O&D focus city for AA. Also, the economy around here hasn't been the best lately. You know you've got issues when law firms start firing people... I actually thought that AA would be cutting its SJC-NRT service with the annoucements of the new route structure.

User currently offlineModesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2815 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1835 times:

How has the demise of the dot bombs affected SJC traffic? Has there been any significant impact?

User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9191 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1733 times:

Perhaps as a connecting flight from SFO?



User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9191 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1731 times:

One more thing, I SERIOUSLY doubt that they will use a B 747-400 all the way from HKG to SJC. Do they have enough traffic, payloads etc etc? Its simply too big for this route.

What about an A 340-300?

Maybe as a connecting flight from SFO yes.

Also, do they have enough B 747-400s? Although I heard rumours that they might order a few B 747-400QLR.


User currently offlineMandargb From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 195 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1720 times:

I would presume in that case would they be better off in terams of load to do
SJC-NRT-HKG
with 777 and codeshare with AA ?


User currently offlineRyu2 From Taiwan, joined Aug 2002, 494 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 1685 times:

Can SJC even handle a 747-400, physically? I read that even AA had to get special permission to fly a 777 to NRT.

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8031 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1679 times:

If CX does seriously look at SJC-HKG, it will not be flown by a 747-400 (there's no gates at Terminal A that can accommodate a 744 easily). It will probably be flown by A340-300's instead.

Now, CI flying SJC-TPE might actually make more sense, given that the southern part of the San Francisco Bay Area has a large contingent of Taiwanese ex-patriates. Such a flight will be flown by either the A340-300 (if CI hangs on to them) or the 777-200ER if CI chooses to buy them.


User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1662 times:

AA tried SJC-TPE last year. The 777 flight was full. But due to the sharp drop of demand after September 11, causing global economic turmoil, the route was dropped.

Perhaps mainly due to the high-tech sector gets sharp decline of needs after September 11, when suffering the bursting bubbles of dot com.

Not sure if CI will fly SJC-TPE, because it may be difficult to maintain a daily flight of SJC-TPE and SFO-TPE.


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9191 posts, RR: 15
Reply 11, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1658 times:

The B 747-400 is simply too big for this route. At least as a start. It makes no sense.

The A 340-300 should be used instead, if they really want to fly to SJC.

Can SJC handle a B 747-400?


User currently offlineAa777flyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1653 times:

Yes SJC can handle a 744, the new FIS gate A1C or A1A I believe will handle a 744 in the new FIS, it does block gate A2 from use while on the gate. The new runway once open will be 11,000 feet long so the airport can handle the 744. According to SJC ops the 744 could be approved for SJC if CX does express serious interest in the route. The main issue right now is that CX wants to leave around 0100, but due to the SJC curfew CX would need to retime the flight to arrive in HKG to meet up with connecting traffic.
Although I doubt we would see this till next year at the earliest, I think eventually we will see more long haul out of SJC>


User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 21
Reply 13, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1624 times:

SJC-NRT has been around for over a decade, and I think the route has proved itself enough that we won't see it being cut anytime soon. However, if SJC-HKG was started, then the NRT flight would see a not-insignificant drop in connecting passengers. I flew HKG-NRT-SJC on CX/AA a year or two ago, and remember a large number of people going from Hong Kong to San Jose connecting in Narita.

In any case, SJC-HKG is still a possibility. CX will obviously use the A340 or 777 (do they have ER versions?) if they do start the flight. Using a 747 on an entirely new route like that would be foolish.

I imagine we'd also see service cutbacks at SFO if CX opens up SJC. Perhaps one or both of the twice daily 747s downgraded to a 777 or A340.

It'd be nice to see some variet at SJC, though!

Aaron G.



User currently offlineILOVEA340 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 2100 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1608 times:

There is not a chance that HKG-SFO will connect on to SJC. Depending on the clearance you get its a 10-20min flight. They would be much better off starting a bus service. The idea of flying a 747 SFO-SJC is just crazy. REally, how many people do you expect would sit for a hour at SFO just to take a 10min connector flight which takes only 30min in a car
 Smile


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9191 posts, RR: 15
Reply 15, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1585 times:

The B 777s that CX have are NON-ER versions and they cannot fly from HKG to SFO.

It will interesting if they deploy the B 747-400 for HKG-SJC but I certainly doubt they will. It is not economical at all! They simply can't fill up a B 744 for this route. HKG-SFO, yes. But not SJC. Perhaps an A 340-300.....


User currently offlineRyu2 From Taiwan, joined Aug 2002, 494 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1577 times:

How about AA flying SJC-HKG with 777?

User currently offlineB-HXB From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 745 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1559 times:

Cathay flies daily to SFO, not twice daily. I wouldn't see the point of flying SJC/HKG given, as someone pointed out, it's a 30 minute drive. It would be like Cathay suddenly deciding to start flying from Newark as well as JFK.

User currently offlineCx flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6626 posts, RR: 55
Reply 18, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1542 times:

SJC/HKG is a 30 minute drive?! What kind of car do you have!! LOL!!

Cathay are planning to go double daily SFO in the future, so it could well be that we go to SJC from there, however, I have not even heard rumours of this from within....then again, I am Cathay staff, so don't expect me to be told anything by management in advance!


User currently offline9V-SPK From Hong Kong, joined Aug 2001, 1646 posts, RR: 6
Reply 19, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1518 times:

I also don't see the point of flying SJC. Unless they have a stop between HKG - SJC or it just doesn't seem right. Well take it as example SQ serves EWR and JFK but via Amsterdam and Frankfurt respectively, so they're aiming different markets.

There's quite a high demand for HKG - SFO, it's not strange to see CX go double daily. But what would UA or SQ re-act if this does happen?

Best Regards



User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9191 posts, RR: 15
Reply 20, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1494 times:

9V-SPK,

UA had a DOUBLE daily flight to SFO back in 1996/1997 before the introduction of the HKG-ORD route. They were UA 805/806 and UA 835/836.

They PLANNED to restart their second daily flight to San Francisco in Summer 1999. It was on the schedule but they never took off. I booked a flight on UA 835 and I was forced to switch to 805 instead.



User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1421 times:

JFK-EWR and SFO-SJC seems like different case to me.

JFK service is mostly aimed as those passengers in the New York and Manhattan Area.

EWR service is mostly aimed as those passengers who don't live within downtown New York/Manhattan area.

SFO/SJC seems to be a really close area geographically, despite SJC is very close to the Silicon Valley. But since SFO/SJC does not like New York, I 'm not sure whether there'll be market to maintain both SFO and SJC.


User currently offlineSjc>sfo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1418 times:

ILOVEA340-
SJC to SFO is no where near a 30 minute car ride. It's thirty minutes from PA up to SFO, and a good 15 down to SJC, and that's with zero traffic. Realistically, it's 40 minutes with no traffic (never happens) and at least an hour at any reasonable guess.

Still though, a connection from SFO-SJC is completely ludacris.


User currently offlineLGB Photos From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1393 times:

What is sjchkg? Ohhhh you mean SJC-HKG service......

User currently offlineChiawei From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 945 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1369 times:

I totally disagree with the assesment made here. SJC-to asia will work.

Majority of business traveling and foriegn population are concerntrated in south and east bay. From fremont it takes me about 1 hour to get to SFO where SJC can be reached in 20 minutes.

CI currently has free bus rides for pax in the southbay to SFO. I think SJC-TPE, SJC-HKG, SJC-Shanghai would be great for business travellers. I for one would be much happier if I can leave from SJC instead of SFO.

The only problem that I had with AA on SJC-TPE run was the stupid custom that requires you to claim your bag twice plus a 30 minute ride around the airport.



25 Sllevin : I tend to agree with Chiawei; I think it's entirely possible that CX, rather than adding a second SFO-HKG run, might add an SJC-HKG run. The two airpo
26 RayChuang : I think once the new Federal Inspection Service facilities at SJC are in place, I wouldn't be surprised that CX starts a SJC-HKG service using the A34
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CX "Considers" Sjchkg posted Wed Aug 21 2002 17:33:27 by Aa777flyer
CX Management:"Sign Or You're Fired" posted Thu Jul 26 2001 07:05:24 by CX flyboy
CX Pilots Extend "L.I.A"|Action Costs $12.8mi/week posted Thu Jul 19 2001 00:42:46 by Singapore_Air
CX "B-" Registration posted Sun Nov 5 2000 18:49:26 by AFa340-300E
"D" At Atlanta? posted Sun Oct 1 2006 23:33:41 by SW733
MKE Concourse "C" Expansion posted Fri Sep 8 2006 00:16:19 by Phxtravelboy
Flying Blue Mileage For AF "Z" Class posted Thu Aug 31 2006 11:24:27 by Marcus380
Why Do All Canadian Airport Codes Start With "y"? posted Sun Jul 2 2006 17:05:56 by NZ8800
Finally, Some Pix Of DL"s "refreshed" BizE! posted Wed Jun 14 2006 20:39:17 by RwSEA
"T" Tail Questions posted Fri May 19 2006 22:04:16 by 7E72004