Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
When Will Aerolineas Return To Lax?  
User currently offlineL-1011-500 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 368 posts, RR: 2
Posted (12 years 1 month 6 hours ago) and read 2437 times:

Hello all -

I know that in early 2001, Aerolineas Argentinas (AR) suspended service to LAX, no doubt due to their financial problems that were rampant at the time. Now that they have been seemingly resuscitated and are flying to JFK and MIA as well as within Europe again, when will LAX be added onto the route map again?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mark Abbott



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © AirNikon



Thanks -

L-1011-500

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJgore From Argentina, joined Feb 2002, 550 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 month 6 hours ago) and read 2388 times:

I don't certainly know.
As far as i know, Aerolineas Argentinas is recovering from its finantial problems, and they just opened up a hub in spain to serve europe's comuter flights.
Based on this recent step they did in europe, i might think that they will return to lax shortly. Don't get me wrong , i'm not sure.
If you want, ask 747SKIPPER, he's a 747 Captain from Aerolineas Argentinas. May be he has further details.

jgore  Smile


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9169 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 5 hours ago) and read 2377 times:

Based on what they did in Europe, I think they MIGHT return to LAX shortly. There is a market. But whether or not it is the right time for them to return to LAX is another issue. They are still recovering from their Financial Problems.

User currently offlineLima From Argentina, joined May 1999, 1122 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2348 times:

If you can read Spanish, on www.salvemosaerolineas.com.ar there are a cuople of recent articles where the CEO (Mata) announced plans to return to LAX in 2003.

The flight would be with an intermediate stop to profit from fifth freedom rights. I guess the stop might be Lima, as it was traditionally have been. Let's hope.


User currently offlineArgento From Argentina, joined Feb 2000, 230 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2313 times:

I do not have any notice here in Buenos Aires.
For many years the route was EZE-LIM-MEX-LAX with the only Aerolineas 747-SP,back in the 80s.
In late 90s the route was non-stop with the A340-200.
I think it is not the first stop to reopen,but it is an excellent west coast destination and Asian connection.


User currently offlinePlaneguy From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 333 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2290 times:

Aerolineas? I'm waiting for Southern Winds to come over here.

User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32782 posts, RR: 72
Reply 6, posted (12 years 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2291 times:

Aerolineas Argentinas cannot add service to the US now that they are a category II country. This has put daily service to JFK and MIA, which was to begin in two weeks, on hold. It has also put on hold M80 service from Miami to points in the Caribbean, Mexico, and Canada, as well as plans to return to LAX. Because they fly wet-leased 767-300ERs from Air Atlanta, Southern Winds can add US service, as they did last week with the launch of COR-EZE-MIA. However, thier two 763s are busy flying to Miami and, starting next week, Madrid. They need more planes before they go on with expansion plans, which include Cordoba-Miami/Madrid, as well as Buenos Aires-LAX/JFK. And of course, before any of that, they need to hope thier recently launched MIA and soon-to-be-launched MAD service does well.


a.
User currently offlineJj From Algeria, joined Jun 2001, 1227 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2277 times:

I never understood why we were put in Cat 2. It was more than a safety measure, a political one.

However, the FAA recently evaluated Aerolinea's maintenance hangars in EZE, and approved them to do up to D checks if I'm not mistaken. So why shouldn't they allow AR to fly to LAX, when they're sure the maintenance is good? Interestingly, AR has just added another frequency to JFK!

Who understands this?.... I hope we do return to LAX sooner than later.

jj


User currently onlineLatinPlane From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 2724 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (12 years 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2268 times:


Lan Chile has taken away the market AR left open after they left LAX. AR had flown here since the early 80s (or late70s?) flying in pretty much all of the Argentinian and Peruvian community that now resides in California. The brief resumption of AR's services into LAX between 2000-2001, was not very popular and registered low load-factors due to competition from LAN, which offered better service, daily schedules, and a consistent product (even if it meant an extra stop in SCL).

In my opinion, (and if there is a way out of Category ll for Argentina) AR might want to restart services to LAX flying their old EZE-LIM-MEX-LAX route. Although it's a route with many stops, it would compare with LAN's: LAX-LIM-SCL (stransfer of plane) SCL-EZE. AR would benefit from 5th freedom rights to/from Peru, as those are not hard to get, and add MEX to its route network. The only problem would be trying to get 5th freedom rights on the LAX-MEX sector, which are not so easy to get.



 Smile LatinPlane


User currently offlineLanPeru From Peru, joined Jun 2001, 645 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (12 years 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2248 times:

Actually LatinPlane, there is no change of aircraft.

User currently onlineLatinPlane From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 2724 posts, RR: 14
Reply 10, posted (12 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2245 times:



LanPeru:

Really? I'm pretty sure that the passengers have to disembark at SCL in order to clean and prepare the aircraft considering the very long flight.


 Smile LatinPlane


User currently offlineLan_Fanatic From Chile, joined Sep 2001, 1071 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (12 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2239 times:

LatinPlane:

Maybe they have to disembark due to cleaning reasons, but the aircraft is the same (A340-300)


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
When Will Frontier Return To The NE? posted Fri Aug 22 2003 21:52:53 by JumboBumbo
When Will QF Return Its 767's To BA? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 16:22:40 by 8herveg
When Will AC Return Service To MSY? posted Wed Feb 8 2006 03:46:57 by Simairlinenet
When Will EK Fly DXB-LAX? posted Fri Oct 20 2006 02:10:05 by Boeingfever777
When Will SA Need To Renew It's Fleet? posted Mon Oct 2 2006 05:42:15 by JAM747
Alaska Emergency Return To LAX posted Mon Sep 18 2006 02:26:55 by HAL
KLM Will Not Return To Beirut posted Wed Aug 23 2006 14:07:29 by KL911
Will WestJet Return To SAN This Summer? posted Wed May 17 2006 19:04:40 by Lindy Field
When Will Song Begin To Reconfigure Their Planes? posted Thu Feb 23 2006 05:20:51 by DL4EVR
When Will Primaris Launch JFK - LAX/SFO posted Mon Dec 19 2005 22:30:48 by Amirs