Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BAA (UK) Could Shelve LHR T5 If Fees Not Increased  
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13753 posts, RR: 18
Posted (13 years 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1449 times:

British Airports Authority PLC could shelve the proposed Terminal 5 development at London Heathrow Airport if it is not allowed to raise landing charges, BAA CEO Mike Hodgkinson is reportedly saying.

The £2 500 000 000 / US$3 801 250 000 6 year late terminal could be shelved if landing fees are not allowed to be doubled.

Faliure to build the Terminal would be a total catastrophe for the UK's largest airline and 16 000 jobs could be endangered.

More information at the Annanova / AFX website

Information was gathered from the above hyperlinked webpage. Full information can be viewed by clicking the above hyperlink. Currency conversion from United Kingdom Pounds to US Dollars courtesy of the Singapore Airlines Currency Converter

Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13753 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1431 times:

'In these circumstances according to the Government's own estimates, airports will become more and more crowded and fares could rise as much as £100 a passenger,' Mr. Hodgkinson said.

'It is inconceivable that the terminal would not be built. The regulator would not allow it. I just don't believe that BAA does not have the resources. If the charges are raised, we will have to pass on any increase to passengers, who will suffer. Unlike BAA we do not make a profit. They should cut their costs," said Andrew Cahn, British Airways Government and International Affairs.

'We are still considering the whole issue. We will not make the final decision until the end of January,' said the UK's Civil Aviation Authority.

More information at the Daily Mail / This Is Money website

Quotes were gathered from the above hyperlinked webpage. Full information can be viewed by clicking the above hyperlink

Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12956 posts, RR: 34
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1426 times:

Children throwing tantrums to get what they want; it's not at all unusual. Dire predictions and thinly veiled threats, "if we don't get our way". The CAA responded correctly. It will take the decision, the likelihood being that there will be a compromise - a fee increase, but not as much as BA feared or the CAA wanted. And believe it, T5 will be built. Or else . . .

More interesting news in today's UK papers is that BA is approaching householders in Sipson (a soon to be ex-village between the M4 and A4, where the new third runway will be built), to offer them compensation for the construction of the new runway through their front rooms. It's possible that other airlines may follow suit.

("So, does that mean we'll need to dig up the begonias?", "er, yes, madam, and the front lawn and basically the whole house between the front hedge and the garden shed - but all for a good cause"!)

User currently offlineJsnww81 From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2231 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1410 times:

How long will the new third runway be? Will it be spaced wide enough apart from 9L-27R to allow parallel operations?

User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 1375 times:

LHR access is so much in demand that I shouldn't think BAA will have difficulty finding willing customers to fill up the gates on a fifth terminal. It only took four airlines to finance JFK T1.

User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 25277 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 1338 times:

I believe T5 was intended for BA/oneWorld use.

When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 1333 times:

LHR could probabrly fill another 4 terminals-but they need another runway to do this and LHR doesnt have much room left.

User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 18
Reply 7, posted (13 years 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1308 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Even if LHR is approved another runway, it will be a good few years away. T5 will increase capacity to around 80 million pax a year for LHR. Still don't see any additional room for a third runway at LHR?

In Arsene we trust!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA To Australia Will NOT Use LHR T5 posted Tue Apr 18 2006 18:38:52 by TLVFred
Baggage Problems At LHR T5 posted Sun Jun 28 2009 08:22:08 by SeansasLCY
''Flash Mob'' Hundreds Protest Inside LHR T5 posted Sat Jan 17 2009 08:28:42 by OA260
LHR T5 - How's It Coping? posted Sat Oct 25 2008 08:49:12 by Aware
Why Increase Fees Not Fares? posted Mon Jun 30 2008 13:07:50 by Pmg1704
BBC: LHR T5 Int Arrivals "unchecked" posted Sun May 11 2008 08:36:47 by Jamesontheroad
LHR T5- Finally Running Smoothly? posted Thu Apr 10 2008 12:51:37 by A350
LHR T5: Automated Baggage Sorting System Fails posted Sat Apr 5 2008 03:51:07 by SINGAPORE_AIR
LHR-T5-Baggage Handlers At Fault? posted Tue Apr 1 2008 14:03:55 by TonyBurr
Question About LHR T5 Picture In AW&ST posted Mon Mar 31 2008 17:14:55 by 787seattle