Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
FAA & Congess, Investigating Airbus And AF296  
User currently offlineDeltaAir From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1094 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1776 times:

In the first crash of a new 'Fly-By-Wire' aircraft, the Airbus A320-100 impacted trees while performing a fly-by at an airshow and burst into flames. The crew, and Air France maintenance officials, have all been sentenced to probation for manslaughter; the Captain has been imprisoned. Evidence, including photographs, has now been exposed that an Airbus official at the scene switched the Digital Flight Data Recorder before the court hearing. The FAA and U.S. Government are now getting invloved with the investigation and possible problems. It is a crime to tamper with any evidence at a crash site, espically the FDR or CRV.

Added:
Congress is looking into the situation and the possibilty of charges being flied against Airbus and Air France employees, fining of both Air France and Airbus, and possible sanctions against Airbus and France.

For More: http://www.airdisaster.com/investigations/af296/af296.html

Or For the Offical Report Reguarding the Boxes:
http://www.snpl.com/habsheim.html




6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1655 times:

What does congress have to do with this? Didn't happen in the US, wasn't a US airline or airplane, ...

Maybe some of the individuals charged or killed are americans?


User currently offlineDeltaAir From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1094 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1649 times:

I am not sure to be honest. I think more of it is that Airbus broke the law to make an aircraft successful.

User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9523 posts, RR: 42
Reply 3, posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1644 times:

It may be that the US can take action against any airline flying there if they've been involved in something that hinders international co-operation in flight safety issues.

As a devout fence-sitter in the regular debates, I'll be outraged if the rumours turn out to be fact. I've heard the rumours before.

There was a programme on TV the other day in the UK which also pointed out that there were 40 foot high trees at the end of the runway which the pilot would not have seen, and thus may have forgotten about, while demonstrating the high angle of attack in the slow go-around.

Whatever the actual cause of the crash, switching data recorders just isn't on and it's the kind of thing you just don't expect in a civilised country.


User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8894 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1626 times:

Still, the FAA and Congress shouldn't be involved with this. After all, they have other things to worry about (election year for all of the house, a third of the Senate, and the President.)

Jeff


User currently offlinePilot1113 From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2333 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1622 times:

All I can say is finally...

No government entity holds on to a DFDR or a CVR for 8 days, requiring a court order to get them back, then ultimately requiring that country's highest police officer to get them back. That is unless that government has some interest in the crash.

- Neil Harrison


User currently offlineMagyar From Hungary, joined Feb 2000, 599 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (14 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1609 times:

The FAA and Congress is not involved in the investigation, or
at least the websites mentioned by DeltaAir do not indicate
that. As far as I understood the Captain of AF296 is trying
to overturn his sentence (he was blamed for everything) and
a swiss forensic institute showed that the DFDR and CVR
has been manipulated. Also they show a photo of someone
carrying DFDR/CVR-like objects at the crash site.

If this is true (and I can readily believe it is) than it was a
coordinated cover up by French Gov./Airbus/Air France/
Snectma(I think they were the engine manufacturers).

Janos


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why I Love Boeing & Airbus (and What I Don't Like) posted Sun Mar 5 2006 22:40:44 by JAAlbert
Airbus And Boeing Product Strategy posted Wed Oct 25 2006 20:52:57 by Katekebo
Airbus And The A345, Boeing And The 772LR posted Wed Oct 18 2006 17:36:21 by Dangould2000
More Private Jets Ordered From Airbus And Boeing posted Wed Oct 18 2006 16:47:20 by Manni
Airbus And Their Jet Lag Zapper posted Fri Aug 25 2006 15:23:24 by Clickhappy
Engine Commonalities Between Airbus And Boeings? posted Tue Aug 15 2006 04:00:31 by JAM747
Airbus And Boeing On Their Way To Iran? posted Tue Jun 6 2006 17:14:25 by PM
Airbus And Boeing Orders posted Wed May 10 2006 05:52:39 by Kaitak744
How Do Airbus And Boeing Get Financed? posted Thu Apr 27 2006 09:39:35 by RootsAir
Fuel Burn Of Airbus And Boeing? posted Tue Apr 25 2006 04:39:13 by MaxQ2351