Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MD 88's Taxi On 1 Engine  
User currently offlineRick From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 129 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1538 times:

I fly on a lot of Delta Airlines MD 88's, love em', and over the last few years, I have noticed that they only use 1 engine to taxi. The plane pushes back from the gate and the flight crew starts 1 engine, then about 3/4 of the way out to the runway, I hear a slight popping sound as the 2nd engine fires up. I heard some years ago that airlines did this to save fuel with the old DC9's and 727's, but would they really be saving that much fuel with the newer model planes?

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1481 times:

Okay, consider this.

Yes, it's a fuel-saving measure, more recently implemented by American Airlines as part of their "let's not go bankrupt" scheme.

Here's what's to consider though.

The MD-88 is no longer a terribly efficient airplane. It was, in it's early day, more efficient than the DC-9s and 727s it replaced. But now, we have high bypass ratio 737s and A320s that are quite a bit more efficient than the Pratt JT8d-217's on the MD-80s. Even the -219s are not as efficient.

It not only reduces fuel, it also reduces the number of hours put on the engine. That reduces maintenance costs. Think, if they save ten minutes of running per taxi time, that's two taxi's per flight... if the plane makes 5 flights a day (which is a smaller number than I would expect) that's an entire hour of jet engine running you have cut out.

It really does save money. Now think- on a fleet of 400 MD-80s that American has, or even just the 150 (?) that Delta runs, that's quite a bit of fuel saved every day. That's maybe 400 hours per day (at one hour reduction per aircraft) saved!

Long live the MD-80.

Randy


User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8894 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1429 times:

This has been a Delta policy used on all of its flights for a while. It was created by a Delta Express captain who thought this would be a way to save fuel as well as creating faster turnaround times.

Jeff


User currently offlineCaptain.md-11 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 704 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1413 times:

I had a jump seat ride in a British Midland DC-9 about 7 years ago, and the Captain chose to taxi using one engine only.


Twins,twins, everywhere.... but where are the three holers?
User currently offlineRedngold From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 6907 posts, RR: 45
Reply 4, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1408 times:

Many airlines/aircraft taxi on 1 engine. It's just harder to see with jet engines as opposed to props.

redngold



Up, up and away!
User currently offlineMarcus From Mexico, joined Apr 2001, 1779 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1400 times:

Does this apply only to airliners whose engines are close to the centerline like the DC-9/MD/717 and 727's?


Kids!....we are going to the happiest place on earth...TIJUANA! signed: Krusty the Clown
User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7450 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1361 times:

When I flew on a Canadiar last month,the f/a announced that it would be a little warm in the cabin until they started the #2 engine near the runway.


'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineATA L1011 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1378 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1341 times:

Well DL alot of times use to do the L1011 like that start one engine up during taxi with 2. Alot of this was alos due to the fact that the 1011-1/100 is very slow to spool up.


Treat others as you expect to be treated!
User currently offlineSquigee From Canada, joined May 2001, 652 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1327 times:

DC-10 pilots are told that they can leave the second (middle) engine off until they approach the runway to save fuel and mx costs.


Someday, we'll look back at this, laugh nervously, and then change the subject.
User currently offlineGotAirbus From Singapore, joined May 2001, 851 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1286 times:

Question i was meaning to ask for a long time

Wouldn't it be hard if most airliners (especially turboprops) taxi only on one engine. That engine alone would veer the aircraft off the taxiway and the pilot had to compensate using the tiller wheel?

(gotAirbus?)-(Got commonality?)-(Have A Nice Day!)



(gotAIRBUS?) - (Got Commonality?) - (Have A Nice Flight!)
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1225 times:

On the CRJ, I know that they tend to taxi on one engine because two engine taxiing tends to be too fast, and they have to ride the brakes. On bigger aircraft, I assume it's mainly for fuel savings.

Steve


User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7450 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1212 times:

That makes sense...I remeber when I flew American^Eagle in '94 on a Shorts 360 , they didn't start the port engine til we were near the runway.


'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineDalmd88 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2534 posts, RR: 14
Reply 12, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1123 times:

Taxing on one engine saves fuel and wear on the engine but not time. Operating time on engines doesn't start until the plane takes off. You only record flight time not block to block. Maintenance runs also don't count as use hours or engine cycles.

As a side note Delta recently posted a memo to the mechanics about excessive use of the apu's. These hours and cycles do count and the fuel use adds up. Using the apu's to power lights while working or cabin cleaning is using up the warranty time on some of the apu's in the 777 and 767 fleet.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29791 posts, RR: 58
Reply 13, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1109 times:

A lot of times it is easier to maintain a slow taxi if you aren't fighting the idle thrust that is put out by all of your engines.

A lot of airlines will shut down the right hand motor. That way the engine has time to stop spinning before they are parked, makes it a wee bit safer for the ground crew that is going to be working around it since the luggage bins are on that side.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineLMML 14/32 From Malta, joined Jan 2001, 2565 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1052 times:

So this can also be done after landing too this time by shutting down one engine after landing. There is one problem with starting on the taxiway: you have no ground engineer to monitor the exterior and if there is a fuel leak there is nobody to tell you about it.

User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1049 times:

On newer aircraft such as the 717, If there is a fuel leak, they will be able to see it on the EICAS. Now I think the MD88s have that too, but you do have a point with the DC9s.

User currently offlineThirtyEcho From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 1643 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1030 times:

This has been a common practice for a long time in aviation, going back to DC3s, 4s, 6s and 7s. In the recips, it was more common taxiing in than taxiing out as the outbound taxi time was sometimes used to warm the engines and perform mag checks, set fuel flows, etc. My uncle was a B24 pilot and they usually taxied out on 2 inboard engines as it cut fuel usage on the ground.

User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1007 times:

I've only got a few hours in DC-3's, but I gotta say that I can't picture doing much taxiing on just one engine...

Steve


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL Business Class On MD-88? posted Sat May 27 2006 02:33:31 by Jhooper
Delta Shuttle On The MD-88 posted Thu Nov 24 2005 18:43:21 by RJpieces
DL To Start MD-88 Service To PHF On January 31 posted Sun Jan 2 2005 23:31:36 by IslipWN
SkyTeam Logo On Delta's MD-88/90s posted Thu May 13 2004 21:47:59 by WidgetBoi
Delta Air Lines Tests Security Devices On MD-88 posted Tue Oct 30 2001 06:37:28 by DeltaSFO
?A380 Delays Effect On Engine Makers? posted Tue Oct 3 2006 20:14:33 by Mush
Delta - Why The MD-88 Over The 737-400? posted Fri Jul 28 2006 22:25:39 by 1337Delta764
Refurbished Delta MD-88 Question posted Wed Jul 12 2006 16:05:45 by 1337Delta764
Finnair's Last MD-80 Flight On 3rd Of July posted Wed Jun 28 2006 22:26:44 by Andaman
DL MD-88 Accident In 1996 posted Wed Mar 15 2006 19:00:49 by Lindy