Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
If The Ansett April Grounding Did Not Take Place..  
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1802 times:

I understand that it was the April Grounding which put Ansett Australia in a worse Financial Situation. However, Ansett was very sick before the April grounding.

If the Ansett April Grounding did not take place, would Ansett be flying now? I doubt it......

Comments?

By the way, is Ansett Australia's brand name still up for sale? Although no one might want it.

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4537 posts, RR: 41
Reply 1, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1762 times:

Well, Ansett had the bad luck (although some people will tell you it was more to do with political pressure being exerted on CASA, in deference to another Australian airline) of having groundings over the busy Christmas and Easter periods. This doubtless had a very negative effect on their bottom line. Perhaps had the groundings not occured, they would have had enough cash to last longer, perhaps long enough to allow the Air New Zealand group to secure capital. However, the post September 11 downturn, and the effects of the domestic price war, surely would have still been crippling. Simple answer - who knows?

Of course, it is all academic - the April groundings did happen, and the whole thing turned to custard.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1746 times:

I wonder why no one was interested to take over Ansett. It could be profitable in the long run.

User currently offlineRyanair!!! From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 4749 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1716 times:

The reason no one wanted Ansett was because the airline was so sick it would only take a miracle to save it.


Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1711 times:

Even without the April grounding?

User currently offlineGo Canada! From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 2955 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1695 times:

It could be profitable in the long run.

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Im sorry united, i know you liked ansett but its time to let go, it wouldnt have been successful with or without the april grounding, it simply speeded up the process.



It is amazing what can be accomplised when nobody takes the credit
User currently offlineRyanair From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 654 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1698 times:

The whole 767 affair was very bad for the AN brand. It was a key factor, but remove it and the Air New Zealand Group would still have gone bust.

User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1665 times:

Maybe....

I doubt AN can survive even without the April grounding.  Smile

What if PWC remained the administrator of Ansett? Would Ansett been saved? It seems that PWC was a lot more serious.


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1666 times:

Just a pure speculation........If the April grounding did not take place, Air New Zealand could have had enough time to raise money for Ansett. Comments?

Please do not run this into an Air New Zealand VS Ansett war.  Smile


User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1667 times:

Go_Canada: The whole 767 grounding is the major factor that turns Ansett dramatically.

Publics and the travellers lose their cofidence on Ansett Australia because of the B767 grounding, plus the news of AN flying "unhealthy" 767 for 3000hrs.

September 11 is just another factor that directly hits Ansett.


User currently offlineAamd11 From UK - Wales, joined Nov 2001, 1059 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1661 times:

Its known fact that the 767 grounding was just another nail in the coffin of AN, along with Spetember 11th, and the general travel slump.

They all played a large role in killing the airline, the price wars fought by AN, QF and Virgin [and at one point Impulse] hurt AN too.

Only if Impule and Virgin did not enter the market, only if the groundings didnt occur, would Ansett be in a better position to turn around its fortunes for the better.

I cant remember the exact grounding details, was it only 762s or were 763s involved too? and how many 763s did AN bring in to cover the grounded 767s?
i can recall AC and Canadian aircraft being flown in Australia, but how many a/c in total??

Regards,
A^A MD-11


User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 11, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1658 times:

I remember AN brought in one SQ744 to "assist"... the SQ 744 from SYD i think would do a domestic flight to MEL and back for Ansett Australia.....

Other than that, I think one AC763 was involved...

For the groundings, all 767s were involved.. I think it was discovered that they fixed 767-200 flaps on the 767-300 or something like that.. and lots of maintenance cover up...



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 12, posted (11 years 11 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1658 times:

Ansett has been sick for a long time.........

Ansett might not be able to survive even without the April Grounding. They were very sick before the grounding. 9.11 has nothing to do with the collapse of Ansett since they were dying before that. Besides, AN did not fly to USA.

And if I remember correctly, AN was moved into administration before 9.11


User currently offlineMx5_boy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1628 times:

Guys,

Interestingly the AN brand is still available for purchase and *someone* has registration with ASIC pending for the business name:

"Ansett Airlines of Australia"

There is still a lot of good brand faith with AN.

mb


User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1587 times:

Impulse and Virgin Blue only played a small role to kill Ansett. But it shouldn't be considered as a factor for Ansett's demise. They were tiny babies at that time.

It's the public's confidence towards Ansett Australia that killed AN.


User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4537 posts, RR: 41
Reply 15, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1590 times:

Bigo747 - I think you are underestimating the effect that the fare war sparked by these two carriers had on Ansett. It was no coincidence that Ansett's problems began snowballing from the second half of 2000. Ansett would still have been in difficulties if the AN/QF duopoly had have been maintained, but it would have been somewhat healthier.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9160 posts, RR: 15
Reply 16, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1571 times:

Someone should have bought the airline..........Indeed there is a future for it.

Let's just hope that Ansett will return as a larger/more successful airline in the future.


User currently offlineRyanair!!! From Australia, joined Mar 2002, 4749 posts, RR: 26
Reply 17, posted (11 years 11 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1565 times:

United Airline,

you do not seem to understand the extend of Ansett's internal "cancer". When the administrators took over, they were "appalled" at the state of the airline's books. Simply because there was no money left. Singapore Airlines, while many argued, may have saved the airline but was blocked by ANZ, wasn't too keen towards the end because Ansett was already run to the ground by the former owners.

Someone could have saved the airline by buying it? True, someone with a lot of balls. But looking at the timing (travel slump, worldwide recession, 911...), many reasons contributed to why the airline industry was a battered one. What's more to invest in a sick airline at a time when all the major carriers were suffering? Not a wise decision, even I can imagine.

So you see, we would never know if Ansett could be saved... Move on matey.



Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
If The Ansett Groundings Did Not Take Place....... posted Sat Sep 4 2004 11:53:19 by United Airline
What If TWA Did Not Take Over Ozark? posted Mon May 15 2006 15:48:17 by 7E72004
9/11 Flights That Did Not Take Off posted Tue Sep 13 2005 00:30:24 by Clickhappy
When Did Ansett's B 767 Grounding Take Place? posted Wed Feb 6 2002 06:11:27 by United Airline
Airbus, Why Not Take On The 777? posted Sun Jul 2 2006 06:26:10 by Tangowhisky
How Can You Order If The Design Is Not Clear? posted Wed Apr 26 2006 13:23:24 by Art
What If The A380 Had NOT Been Built posted Sat Nov 19 2005 22:59:17 by BoomBoom
Would US Take Any NW Or TZ A/C If The Worst Occurs posted Sat Sep 3 2005 21:03:29 by Jdwfloyd
Will The 787 Take Place Of Other Boeings? posted Tue Feb 15 2005 04:18:42 by B747PILOT
Which Of The ATR42s Did WCA Take From Aces? posted Thu Jul 29 2004 20:40:53 by RCS763av