Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SIA Sabotages Qantas Capital Raising  
User currently offlineQANTASpower From Australia, joined Aug 2002, 516 posts, RR: 7
Posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1824 times:

Can I just say how absolutely disgusted I am with the sabotage of QF's retail capital raising by SIA. They have leaked to the media stories about starting a proposed third airline and have sent QF's shares below $4. This is well below the offer price of $4.20. This has undermined the retail capital raising. No one minds fair competition but this is way out of line.

SHAME SIA SHAME



36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1805 times:

Source of your info or is this just your opinion?


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineQANTASpower From Australia, joined Aug 2002, 516 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1797 times:

SIA this morning via their spokesman stated that we have recently sent "teams" of our people to Australia to look at the domestic market.

Why now SIA. Ansett went under 1 year ago. Or is this some sort of pay back for QF's so called interference in attempts to increase the shareholding in ANZ.

No wonder just about every other country in the world would never allow a foreign carrier such as SIA to set up operations.

The constant threat of SIA entering this market is undermining the ability of QF to raise funds for growth. A problem SIA would never encounter being a protected monopoly.


User currently offlineMarara From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 678 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1787 times:

business is business i guess.

And most of the info had been floating around long before QF halted its shares



I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. Jerome K Jerome
User currently offlineJsmith From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1776 times:

QFP

I can't believe you make reference to 'fair competition' and 'Qantas' in the same paragraph. What a joke. Since when have Qantas been interested in fair competition?


User currently offlineMarara From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 678 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1775 times:

I would hardly call SIA a protected monopoly, SIA competes with product (mainly) SIN is one of the most open Airports in the world with many carriers competing against it on nearly all routes especially with neighbours such as MH, QF, TG, CX im sure the competition is intense. QF/BA even have their 'sub-hub' in SIN.


I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. Jerome K Jerome
User currently offlineQANTASpower From Australia, joined Aug 2002, 516 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 1759 times:

And what about QF Marara. How many carriers compete with it on the European routes? Every single one of the Asian carriers because we in Australia are at the end of the line. Maybe you should sit back and have a think about how many carriers SIA for example compete with out of their home country with on say London flights with how many QF compete with. SIA compete with BA & QF for direct flights. QF on the the other hand has to compete with every single Asian & Middle Eastern carrier.

User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 1741 times:

I wasn't aware that Singapore Airlines Group had any shareholding in QF and then sold some shares which would have made the QF share price decrease.

Long live Anzett.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineBBD From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 62 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 1738 times:

I suspect that the scenario advanced by QANTASpower is probably closer to the real intentions of SQ than actually wanting to enter the market directly. Certainly their conduct to date, and, in particular, their comments on these rumours, has served to further fuel them and keep them going.
If this is, indeed, the case, then I think it comes under the "all is fair in love and war" category.
One can argue than QF used similar tactics towards SQ/NZ during the battle with AN, and are still using similar tactics against NZ in their campaign to convince of the benefits of QF taking a stakeholding in NZ.
Indeed, from my perception of Geoff Dixon, he could actually be enjoying the battle.


User currently offlineTullamarine From Australia, joined Aug 1999, 1569 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 1717 times:

Qantas are big boys and I'm sure they can cope. If investors think $4.20 is a good buy then they'll go for it. If not, QF will have to wait but given the institutional enthusiasm the other week, any shortfall could easily be made up via another institutional placement.

Who knows if SQ meant to inflict damage on QF? If they meant to, they should have acted a couple of weeks ago and lowered the book build price.

The Australian sharemarket has slipped over the past week and the continuing problems in the US economy means that QF's international ops will take even longer to come back. All these things are weighing on the share price. I somehow doubt the re-run of a story thats been around for 10 months is the only cause of the QF slump.



717,721/2,732/3/4/5/7/8/9,742/3/4,752/3,762/3,772,W,A310,320,321,332,333,388,DC9,DC10,F28,F100,142,143,E90,CR2,D82/3/4,S
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Reply 10, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1705 times:

"Or is this some sort of pay back for QF's so called interference in attempts to increase the shareholding in ANZ."

Wouldn't you agree that QF's actions could also be sabotaging SIA's attempts of increasing it's stake in ANZ?



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineSkystar From Australia, joined Jan 2000, 1363 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1701 times:

What do you mean when you write,

"Long live Anzett"

Are you purposely misspelling Ansett or are you referring to the airliners.net character, and if so, why?

Cheers,

Justin


User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 12, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1657 times:

I juz re-read what QantasPower has said... Just wondering how a 2-3 month old rumour could sabotage Qantas? Perhaps we should say that Qantas is wanting to Sabotage Star Alliance by buying into Air NZ, and forcing ANZ out of Star?

Qantaspower:
Monopoly eh? Who has the Monopoly in Australia? Please, I dont mean any offence, but you do seem to be the Qantas version of Singapore_Air.



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineQANTASpower From Australia, joined Aug 2002, 516 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

Tsentsan

The rumour is old but for some reason SIA has been inflaming it over the past fews days. This is the major reason that the share price is now lower than the offer price. Why? Wouldn't it be in the interests of SIA to keep it very quite so QF & DJ would not be able to work on and respond to this threat.

Further QF is not a monopoly in AUS. DJ operates on the majority of the major routes. Similar domestic structures are evident in many countries such as Canada, France and Germany.

I don't want to come across as QF's No.1 fan however I am concerned as an Australian about QF being undermined by SIA via Govt regulation which allows them to enter this market. I don't think it is in the national interest to allow this to happen. SIA could very easily de-stabilise the industry here which is in no ones interest.

I have nothing against SIA however I do have concerns about Aust companies which are disadvantaged via Govt regulation which is at odds with other countries rules & regulations.

Regards




User currently offlineSQ772 From Singapore, joined Nov 2001, 1792 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1585 times:

Then your topic should read as "Australian govt regulation sabotages QF capital raising". No?




There's always a better way to fly...
User currently offlineAviasian From Singapore, joined Jan 2001, 1486 posts, RR: 14
Reply 15, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1574 times:

It is hardly accurate to say that another airline's entry into the Australian market is in no one's interest . . . I am certain consumers will value having yet another choice, even if it is not no-frill and low-fare.

KC Sim
Bangkok


User currently offlineMx5_boy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1574 times:

QFPower says:

"""Further QF is not a monopoly in AUS. DJ operates on the majority of the major routes. Similar domestic structures are evident in many countries such as Canada, France and Germany."""

Mate, what are you smoking? I think 85% of the domestic market which QF never had before is most definitely a monopoly.

QFpower says:

"""I don't want to come across as QF's No.1 fan however I am concerned as an Australian about QF being undermined by SIA via Govt regulation which allows them to enter this market. I don't think it is in the national interest to allow this to happen. SIA could very easily de-stabilise the industry here which is in no ones interest."""

Welcome to the cut throat world and new era of Australian aviation. Every other sector industries has had to suffer it. The fact of the matter is that QF need some sort of competition to keep the standards reasonable. The two airline policy was cosy but it was always AN that were the innovaters and exceptionally so. No QF can pull whatever stunts they like.

National interest is out the window these days mate. In the ever changeing world we all have to be leaner and meaner. Unfortunately corporate and shareholder greed will rule the day.

You are QF's no#1 fan and I remember that from meeting you but the reality is that Geoffy D was more than happy to have to foreign investment cap reveiwed which would have allowed QF to be virtually foreign owned.

Do you not read the media?

Cheers buddy!

mb

Kick a clown, burn a clown, don't let them ruin your day.





User currently offlineRmm From Australia, joined Feb 2001, 524 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

QANTASpower wrote,

Further QF is not a monopoly in AUS. DJ operates on the majority of the major routes.

On paper maybe, but if allowed, QF could crush DJ tomorrow.

In relation to foreign sell off's, unfortunately our governments only ever seem to see the short term gain, not the long term impact.

I have nothing against SIA however I do have concerns about Aust companies which are disadvantaged via Govt regulation which is at odds with other countries rules & regulations.

Disadvantage's - do you mean QF not being able to secure more foreign capital or SIA be able to launch local services?

Rmm




User currently offlineAir Taiwan From Australia, joined Dec 1999, 1518 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1547 times:

On Singapore-London,

Qantas/ BA has 4 daily flights
SIA has 3 daily flights.

On Singapore-Bangkok
SIA has 6 daily flights
Thai has 7 daily flights
+ 5 daily flights from other airlines

On Singapore-Sydney
SIA has 2 daily 747 and 1 daily 777 flight
QF/BA has 3 daily 747 flights

SIA protected? I don't think so.

Also, if Qantas can operate domestic New Zealand flights, why can't SIA operate domestic Australian flights? By all means the NZ market is much smaller than the Aust one. Is QF trying to "destablise" NZ's market?

And ask the general public, I'm sure they don't want monopoly and high fares + reduced service!

QantasPower, you must have a lot of shares in Qantas?

cheers!
Jimmy


User currently offlineMilesDependent From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 856 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1497 times:

I am sure the QF deal is under-written by several investment bank. So, in that regard, wouldn't the comments by SIA be an attack on Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley or whoever!!

MD


User currently offlineBeno From Australia, joined Aug 2002, 428 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1474 times:

I would like to share my views on government ownership of airlines some of you may agree and some may strongly disagree and I respect your opinion as you should respect mine. All airlines around the world should not have any intervention or help from governments, a lot of U.S airlines should be left to die or be taken over by stronger competitors. In the Asia/Pacific region Air New Zealand should have been left to sort out its own problems instead of taking a government had out because is not the N.Z tax payers fault that ANZ was in such a hurry to by an airline they could not afford or run.

And in response to a lot of comments about Qantas having a monopoly and having 85% of the Australian market. Since Ansett has gone never has QF abused its market power or risen fares to unfair levels. I can still fly SYD-MEL and SYD-BNE for $134 return so as far as I am concerned Qantas can continue to dominate if they keep offering these fares.

I also agree with QANTASpower about SQ spreading rumors about entering the domestic market, I think they are worried about QFs commitment to spend 13 billion to become the most powerful airline in Asia/Pacific.

Regards

Ben.


User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 21, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1449 times:

Sigh... why do you guys always say that SQ is spreading rumours about QF???

Why dont you all say QF is spreading rumours when they announced they want to buy into SIA????



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Reply 22, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1440 times:

"Why dont you all say QF is spreading rumours when they announced they want to buy into SIA" Because a lot of people who like SIA are afraid of causing a possible argument.

"Please, I dont mean any offence, but you do seem to be the Qantas version of Singapore_Air." Well I take offense to that Tsentsan.

SkyStar: I am not referring to anything in particular however I feel it is necessary to say that. I hope that didn't offend you.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Reply 23, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1396 times:

I did some research:

"Singapore Airlines may revive collapsed Australian airline Ansett as part of a push into the Australian aviation market, local media reported on Tuesday.

The Nine Network said a proposal to resurrect Ansett would be put to the Singapore Airlines board on September 11." - Reuters

"Reports of a proposed new Ansett fleet of 24 Airbuses surfaced after Sydney Airports Corporation confirmed it had been in discussions with Singapore, and followed months of speculation that the airline intended to launch a domestic carrier in Australia." - NZ Herald.

""For the whole of this calendar year I have considered SIA's arrival here to be somewhere between very likely and inevitable," said Harbison, who is managing director of the Centre for Asia-Pacific Aviation." - AFP / Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation.

""We believe their assessment was very serious and very measured," Gibbs told Sydney's Daily Telegraph." - AFP / Sydney Airport Corp. Ltd.

""We came away from these discussions with the belief that they were very serious about their analysis of starting a new airline in Australia."" - Asia Pulse / Peter Gibbs - Sydney Airport Corp. Ltd.





Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineTsentsan From Singapore, joined Jan 2002, 2016 posts, RR: 15
Reply 24, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1382 times:

Singapore_Air,

Apologies if you took offence. As said, no offence was meant. Just putting a point that you're pro-SIA, and QantasPower is pro-Qantas. Just 2 opposite sides of the coin thats all.



NO URLS in signature
25 Aerokiwi : What a ridiculous little outburst from QANTASpower. You're concerned that a foreign airline is having an influence on the Australian domestic market v
26 Bigo747 : Few words to say. "I Don't Get It." All I know is that if SIA really wants to bring Ansett back, they should've brought Ansett back a long time ago, n
27 'Longreach' : Ok lets say that SQ start up. Who do you think will win the battle? I can imagine the advertising now. Do you think a foreign owned Australian icon wo
28 Post contains images Singapore_Air : "Do you think a foreign owned Australian icon would pull the numbers" Why would it not? Because it's not Australian?
29 Luftaom : Get off your high horse... QF gets as good as they give ... you obviously dont recall the QF counter bids for Hazelton as soon as AN launched a takeov
30 Dynkrisolo : Bigo747/Jim: SIA wanted to buy 50% of Ansett from News Corp. ANZ didn't allow them to do so. Later, SIA wanted to increase its ANZ shares partly to re
31 Go Canada! : Business is business, qantas arent crying over this, share prices go up as well as down for a number of reasons, however it isnt the be all and end al
32 B727-200 : All I can say is that I hope you didn't own the bat and ball when you went down the local oval for a hit with your school mates QANTASplower.....
33 Air Taiwan : Singapore_Air, Compared to many Asians, Australians are a patriotic bunch when it comes to buying things/ services, and you'd see a lot of ad's with t
34 Bigo747 : I don't know why you still have this false impession. Because I see things from the other side, so I have different view than yours. If SIA is really
35 QANTASpower : Go Canada, The idea that BA control Qantas today is ridiculous. In fact BA have never controlled Qantas. The fact that BA continue to reduce their sha
36 Luftaom : BA hold exactly the same number of shares as they did when they bought 25% from the Australian government. The fact that more shares have been issued
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Qantas Wants Equity Partner | SIA Talk Rekindled posted Wed Sep 25 2002 08:46:09 by Singapore_Air
Article:Virgin-SIA 'most Likely Qantas Competitor' posted Thu Mar 7 2002 09:07:32 by Singapore_Air
L.News - ANZ Not Seek Further Capital From SIA posted Sat Oct 6 2001 04:01:50 by 9v-spk
Qantas May Launch No-frills Airline In Wake Of SIA posted Thu Jun 21 2001 12:32:05 by QantasAirways
Qantas To Challenge SIA posted Wed Jun 20 2001 12:39:56 by Wirraway
Qantas Slams SIA posted Tue Jun 19 2001 14:11:54 by Wirraway
Qantas Jumbo - Engine Explosion Over Sydney? posted Sat Feb 3 2007 02:17:04 by KiwiTEAL
APA Supports Qantas Fleet Expansion Program posted Thu Feb 1 2007 09:00:56 by Zeke
Qantas & The 747-8i posted Wed Jan 31 2007 06:42:53 by Trentin
Qantas IFE Not Working = Stressed Cabin Crew posted Sun Jan 28 2007 06:17:35 by B787