Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CI Might Goes 12 A333 And 6-8 744(LOI)  
User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 5 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2347 times:

Another dramatic U-turn for China airlines order.

Due to the current Taiwan's difficulties for official political relationship, China Airlines is Likely to order 12 A330-300, and sign the Letter of Intent (LOI) with Boeing for 6 to 8 B747-400.

Internal source from China Airlines days ago says that CI has officially readjusted it's order and has decided to "go ahead" with the order.

The new adjustment will see CI playing the "number game". China Airlines will order small number of Airbus instead of a large number, CI will switch some of the costs for Airbus order to Boeing's Long-haul, high capacity jet. If CI gives green light for this, the total order cost will cost additional billions of US Dollars.

Despite, US used it's political pressure to introduce 777 to CI, CI is not willing to buy 777. With the alternative of 744LOI, this will meet China Airlines' goal of reducing fleet type to 3 (738, 744, 330/340), and not letting Boeing dissapointed.

China Airlines was suppose to order 16 A330-300 in July, for replacing 12 A300 from 2004. Due to the political pressure from EU and US, it was postponed.

CI's CEO says that the postpone of the aircraft order is due to the market condition, including possible scheduled link between Taiwan and Russia, Korea, China. Plus current European route may see some changes in the future, as a result, CI will not rule out any possibilities for "re-adjusting" it's order.

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 5 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2316 times:

Another related report saying that Boeing received a notice from CI for 15 B777-200ER plus 6 744ER (or QXLR).

However, EU recently agreed several bills to support Taiwan politically, which causes Taiwan deciding to "turn back" to Airbus.

The version of the 744 that CI prepares to sign LOI is not clear in Chinese, because "...另加至少六架波音747-400長程高運量客機。" It's either ER or QXLR.

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8288 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (13 years 5 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2288 times:

The more I think about it the more I think CI is better off with the A330-300.

The reason is simple: the A333 has enough range to fly from TPE to most destinations in eastern Asia (NRT, KIX, ICN, HKG, MNL, SIN). And the support Airbus already has in place for the A300B4-600 fleet can be used to support the A333.

User currently offlineBA319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8732 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (13 years 5 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2273 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Don't forget they have the A343 in service so the pilots can fly both A333 & A343's,another cost saving.

I have noticed that CI have 3 738's avaliable for sale,anybody know the reason behind this?

Thanks and Rgds


User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 5 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2242 times:

Those 738 could goes to Mandarin Airlines, their subsidiary, as F100 is expected to leave Mandarin's fleet soon.

User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 5 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2194 times:

How about letting CI order the aircraft they WANT to order ?

User currently offlineB777 From Canada, joined Sep 1999, 371 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 5 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2186 times:

Hkgspotter1, you echo my sentiments but unfortunately, a huge portion of CI is government owned so you will see a lot of arm twisting before the final decision is made.

User currently offlineSpaceman From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (13 years 5 months 5 days ago) and read 2159 times:

Taiwan government is in the process of privatizing CI, so in the future there will be less political pressure on CI to purchase aircraft. With CI's dismal safety record optiaining ETOP might be difficult. CI also likes its long haul fleet with 4 engines because that what the customers want.

User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9468 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (13 years 5 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2096 times:

where did you get that from????

User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 5 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2083 times:

As always, I get these info from either UDN News http://www.udn.com or Chinatimeshttp://news.chiantimes.com.

User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 5 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2074 times:

4 engines is what many people want. Look at VS !!

User currently offlineAerokiwi From New Zealand, joined Jul 2000, 2996 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (13 years 5 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2051 times:

Four engines is what people want?!

What a load of rubbish! China Airlines is weighing up between A330s and B777s. Both of which are TWIN-engine aircraft. Four engines have nothing to do with this order.

Hkgspotter1: What do you mean "look at VS"? Virgin received their A340s during the severe economic downturn (ie. recession) during the early 1990s, at a hugely discounted rate. Subsequently, instead of changing fleet types altogether (to the 777), they may as well stick with the Airbus. It has nothing to do with 4 versus twin engine planes.

User currently offlineAirbus_A340 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2000, 1567 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (13 years 5 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1982 times:

"4 engines, 4 long haul" written on VS's engines. and Branson stated he prefered 4 engines aircraft, it's rather well known, and it's in his biography 'Losing My Virginity'


People. They make an airline. www.cathaypacific.com
User currently offlineWingman From Seychelles, joined May 1999, 2742 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (13 years 5 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1920 times:

If you're talking about "many people" as those associated with aircraft purchase decision-making, then one can see that in terms of decisions which pit twins against quads, just the opposite is true. Since this competition is pretty much limited to the 340 series vs. the 777 series, a quick look at the order/delivery book reveals that the 340 lags behind the 777 by nearly 500 copies.

So the comment should be re-written to say "two engines is what people really want...except for a few people that prefer quads like VS".

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus/Boeing: CI Orders 12 A333, 6-8 B744 posted Tue Sep 24 2002 01:43:59 by Bigo747
A350 To Cost US$12 Bn And To Be Composite posted Sat Nov 4 2006 16:46:58 by NYC777
History Of Qantas' Second Hand 763's And 744's posted Thu Aug 24 2006 18:46:23 by B742
777-200LR Vs -200ER And 744 posted Mon Oct 17 2005 23:28:45 by DesertRat
Wanna Fly The 346 And 744? posted Fri Feb 11 2005 00:15:11 by Pe@rson
AirTran Ships 743, And 744 posted Mon Oct 25 2004 20:56:23 by BR715-A1-30
Crew Rests On NW A333 And A332 posted Wed Aug 11 2004 19:48:41 by Transtar
Star - Air Canada Goes For CRJs And ERJs posted Fri Dec 19 2003 12:06:33 by Backfire
Movie-clips From The Jumpseat (A333 And MD-90) posted Tue Oct 7 2003 15:26:35 by Mikkel777
SIA Issues New RFP For A310 And 744 Replacements posted Wed Feb 26 2003 21:26:10 by Ex_SQer