Bigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (12 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1900 times:
Another dramatic U-turn for China airlines order.
Due to the current Taiwan's difficulties for official political relationship, China Airlines is Likely to order 12 A330-300, and sign the Letter of Intent (LOI) with Boeing for 6 to 8 B747-400.
Internal source from China Airlines days ago says that CI has officially readjusted it's order and has decided to "go ahead" with the order.
The new adjustment will see CI playing the "number game". China Airlines will order small number of Airbus instead of a large number, CI will switch some of the costs for Airbus order to Boeing's Long-haul, high capacity jet. If CI gives green light for this, the total order cost will cost additional billions of US Dollars.
Despite, US used it's political pressure to introduce 777 to CI, CI is not willing to buy 777. With the alternative of 744LOI, this will meet China Airlines' goal of reducing fleet type to 3 (738, 744, 330/340), and not letting Boeing dissapointed.
China Airlines was suppose to order 16 A330-300 in July, for replacing 12 A300 from 2004. Due to the political pressure from EU and US, it was postponed.
CI's CEO says that the postpone of the aircraft order is due to the market condition, including possible scheduled link between Taiwan and Russia, Korea, China. Plus current European route may see some changes in the future, as a result, CI will not rule out any possibilities for "re-adjusting" it's order.
RayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8151 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (12 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1841 times:
The more I think about it the more I think CI is better off with the A330-300.
The reason is simple: the A333 has enough range to fly from TPE to most destinations in eastern Asia (NRT, KIX, ICN, HKG, MNL, SIN). And the support Airbus already has in place for the A300B4-600 fleet can be used to support the A333.
Spaceman From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1712 times:
Taiwan government is in the process of privatizing CI, so in the future there will be less political pressure on CI to purchase aircraft. With CI's dismal safety record optiaining ETOP might be difficult. CI also likes its long haul fleet with 4 engines because that what the customers want.
Aerokiwi From New Zealand, joined Jul 2000, 2823 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (12 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1604 times:
Four engines is what people want?!
What a load of rubbish! China Airlines is weighing up between A330s and B777s. Both of which are TWIN-engine aircraft. Four engines have nothing to do with this order.
Hkgspotter1: What do you mean "look at VS"? Virgin received their A340s during the severe economic downturn (ie. recession) during the early 1990s, at a hugely discounted rate. Subsequently, instead of changing fleet types altogether (to the 777), they may as well stick with the Airbus. It has nothing to do with 4 versus twin engine planes.
Wingman From Seychelles, joined May 1999, 2487 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (12 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1473 times:
If you're talking about "many people" as those associated with aircraft purchase decision-making, then one can see that in terms of decisions which pit twins against quads, just the opposite is true. Since this competition is pretty much limited to the 340 series vs. the 777 series, a quick look at the order/delivery book reveals that the 340 lags behind the 777 by nearly 500 copies.
So the comment should be re-written to say "two engines is what people really want...except for a few people that prefer quads like VS".