Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is The 757 Fading?  
User currently offlineLubcha132 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 2776 posts, RR: 7
Posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2644 times:

I have seen a lot of sad news about my favorite plane recently. BA is retiring theirs, El Al seems to have returned one or two, and (i still have no idea what's up with this) NW is not happy with the 753. The worst news is that there will be no more Condor colored 757s but tom cook is still flying them i guess. What's going on?!

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gregory Bajor
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Europix


J. Lu

26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16248 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2624 times:

The 757 is suffering from an order shortage. Apparently the backlog is now only about 30 aircraft.

Perhaps this will push Boeing to develop the 752ER and a long range 753.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineCerulean From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2617 times:

Well the 757 IS early 1980's technology. So perhaps that may have something to do with it, even though 757 production didn't really start to take off until the late 80's/early 90's, making them fairly adolescent by airliner standards.

Like any other time there's a shift in a fleet, they just may not fit in with those airlines' current needs.

But it's not like those planes are going to disappear into oblivion. Some new start or charter carrier will pick them up.


User currently offlineKjet12 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 975 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2605 times:

What is the source for NW not being happy with their 753s? I have heard people talk about it on the forum but I havent seen a source.

Kris



AA - Doing what we do best.
User currently offlineLubcha132 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 2776 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2566 times:

same with me Kris, i've only seen the pictures.

User currently offlineHAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2560 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2533 times:

And the pictures everyone is making a big deal of are nothing. The one with the masking paper over the new NW 753 was just Boeing doing some work on the windows before delivery. There is NOTHING wrong with the 753, and I think there are just some people making something out of nothing. NW is not returning the new planes, and are very happy with them. This comes from a senior NW 757 pilot I talked to in SEA the other day.

HAL



One smooth landing is skill. Two in a row is luck. Three in a row and someone is lying.
User currently offlineLubcha132 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 2776 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2506 times:

HAL you made my day Big grin the 753 is one of my favorite planes and i'm glad that they are found to be good aircraft.

User currently offlineMatt767 From Canada, joined Jun 2001, 36 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2405 times:

BA is NOT retiring their 757's they are only retiring their 1st 757's to sell to DHL for freighter conversion.According to BA's website they have 36 757's with 2 on operating leases and 1 on a "other lease". Average age is 11.1years. I think they are retiring the 757's with the older engines and selling them to DHL for freighter conversion. the engines are RB211-535C's and keeping the more efficint RB211-535E4 engines.

El al could be returning those 1-2 757's to the lessor because of the current conditions.

NW is happy with their 757-300's!


Matt


User currently offlineJAL From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 5085 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2379 times:

The 757 is indeed suffering from a shortage of orders, wonder what Boeing will do.
NW is happy with their 757-300!!!!!!!



Work Hard But Play Harder
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5771 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 2267 times:

Dude- you all must have missed the Northwest 757-351 topic.
They may or may not be happy with them- that's not the point. The point is that the new Pratt and Whitney engine- never before fitted on a 753- is not able to maintain cabin pressurization at proper levels at certain altitudes. If I remember correctly, when climbing between 23000 feet through 29000 feet, the cabin pressure drops.

They are fixing them- NW is not returning them, from what I gather. They ARE returning them in the sense that they are flying back to Boeing to be repaired/modified. They are NOT returning in the sense of "thirty day money back guarantee, if you have a receipt."

Randall


User currently offlineAamd11 From UK - Wales, joined Nov 2001, 1059 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (11 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2218 times:

Actually, BA is retiring all but 9 of their 757s.
All in the G-BIK* range are to be rid of,
all in the G-BMR* range as well [both of these sets have the C engines, the less powerful, more fuel thirsty and older engines]
and then they are keeping either the G-BPE* fleet or G-CPE* fleet, probably a combination of both, some of the G-CPE fleet was only delievered in 1998 i believe.
G-CPEP is with Air2000 at this point, not sure if its a lease or it was sold to the airline.
They are all to be replaced with A320s and a couple of A321s, and the 9 757s left will be used on the Shuttle servie within the UK, and a few shorthaul Euro routes.

by the way, of the aircraft, they have/had 19 with the newer E engines, and the rest of the 53 were C type.
And currently there are only 18 757s left in the fleet [source:http://www.avnclub.demon.co.uk/fleetstats.htm]

A^A MD-11


User currently offlineJjbiv From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2089 times:

ATA is loving them...

joe


User currently offlineJetBlueRules From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1978 times:

I ahte to be the bearer, or perhaps reminder, of more bad news, but US Airways is also retiring their 752's in favor of A321 aircraft. A good deal of their 757's came from Eastern so it is near time, but I'm going to miss the 757 in US Airways colors. There really is nothing that looks quite as good as a 757 on approach with gear down....I will miss it.

~Brett Big thumbs up


User currently offlineMilemaster From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1064 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1967 times:

As long as airports with high demand and short runways exist (like SNA), there will always be a need for 757's.


User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5480 posts, RR: 15
Reply 14, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1951 times:

This is 4-5 out of several 757 operators. United, Delta, and American have large fleets of them and seem to be happy.

Anybody know the status of Iberia?

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineTrickijedi From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3266 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1937 times:

As many reasons as we can come up with for its demise, the 757 will be around for a long while. This plane is a workhorse and airlines like it because of its flexibility in being able to fly the long and short haul trips.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim Samples




Its better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than be in the air wishing you were on the ground. Fly safe!
User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1888 times:

I must say, the shortage of orders Boeing is seeing for the 757/767 series is quite similar to the shortage of orders for the 737 classics about 10 years ago before they released the NG's. I think there is need of a new 757/767NG family. Improved range & fuel economy, commonality w/ 777 & 737NG, etc.

User currently offlineUal777contrail From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1871 times:

you are basing you idea or thought on the fact european comapies dont want or need the 757's?
they are airbus crazy, of coarse they dont want the 757.
the 757-200 imho is an awesome airplane, when you see that slender beauty comin down the alley on short finals into EGE with a light snow fall you will stand in awe.

the performance of this plane is amazing, it will infact be around for some time.
IMO

also, i am not slamming airbus. i am a big fan of the A320. i like the product, so go easy on me for the comment. it wasnt a slam.


ual 777 contrail



User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1866 times:

One thing is for sure, the -300 is doing nothing for the sales.

User currently offlineHAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2560 posts, RR: 53
Reply 19, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1825 times:

May I remind all of you that there is a lot of economic ugliness in the world today. Nobody is ordering much of anything from anybody right now. Yes, there are a few orders here and there, but nothing like what happened in the last 10 years. Picking out one type like the 757 because orders are slow is ignoring the burning forest for the match on the ground.

ALL types of aircraft are slowing down their production rates. What the world needs is some stability, and some economic recovery before the assembly lines start back up to anywhere near their old levels again. And in this market, do you think any manufacturer would spend the Billions of dollars (or Euros) required to develop a new plane, or even a NG derivative of an existing type? If they did, they'd be nuts (and out of a job in a heartbeat).

I'd suspect that many of you commenting on this subject are young enough to not really remember other economic slowdowns from the past. This is a cycle, just like the one in the early 60's, the early 70's, the early 80's, and the early 90's (see a pattern here?????). There will be a recovery, the aircraft manufacturers will have new aircraft in development eventually, and the airlines will buy new planes. Until then, don't be so quick to write off planes because of slow sales in the last year or so.

Patience got us this far, and will help get us where we are going.

HAL



One smooth landing is skill. Two in a row is luck. Three in a row and someone is lying.
User currently offlineTullamarine From Australia, joined Aug 1999, 1557 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1807 times:

The 757 is a great plane but the reason for its continued production is probably diminishing. Both Airbus and Boeing have developed their A32X and 737NG families to the extent that they can almost carry out all of the duties previously the exclusive domain of the 757 when it came to narrowbodies.

Admittedly, neither the 739 or the A321 has the 757's range but then again few 757s travel over their maximum range as narrowbodies are unpopular on long-haul and planes such as the 763 or A332 are deemed better solutions for these missions.

The 757 is unlikely to attract many orders in the short term as most of the major US carriers, who comprise the largest group of 757 customers, are financially strapped. It is unlikely that any airline that does not already operate the 757 would adopt the 757 as a new type. The family concept offerred by the 737 and A320 is far more attractive.




717,721/2,732/3/4/5/7/8/9,742/3/4,752/3,762/3,772,W,A310,320,321,332,333,388,DC9,DC10,F28,F100,142,143,E90,CR2,D82/3/4,S
User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1770 times:

Which Boeings are doing well ?

Good

737-700
737-800
767-300

OK

777-200
777-300
747-400

BAD

717-200
737-600
737-900
757-200
757-300
767-400


User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1754 times:

The 757 is a great looking aircraft and i hope it stays in service for a long time yet. These days there are too many "boring" aircraft types being operated by the airlines i.e 737. The NG 737 is great but from a spotting point of view they are just as boring as watching a 737-300. The 757 looks very sleek especially in AA colours- it's just a shame we don't operate any here in Australia.

User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1732 times:

HkgSpotter's list seems to be based on the raw # of orders. It is also important to look at competitive factors. This is how I'd put each plane's CURRENT standing

The 767-300 has gotten orders but not nearly as many as the A-330. The A-330 has been chosen most times it has been pitted against the 767. For passenger airlines outside those with large established fleets(read, US carriers), the A-330 is most often the plane of choice. So I would put this one in the OK category. Maybe even BAD. Same thing for the 767-400.

The 737-600 and 737-900 are relatively niche-market airplanes that did not cost allot to develop. . Boeing never expected to sell all that many of them. These I'd put in OK also.

737-700 and 800 is getting orders but so are its airbus competitors at about the same rate. They, also, I would put in OK.

777 is doing GOOD. Comparisons are tougher with this one, but it has gotten allot more orders than the A-340. Even if you count many A-330 orders as choices against the 777, the twin-engined Boeing's order book looks good. Many airlines (Air France comes to mind) with a political preference for Airbus have ordered this plane anyway.

747-400 - current orders are indeed OK but the outlook is very shakey - 777 and A-380 will squeeze it out with time.

757-200,300 - agree, they are'nt doing to well now. But they have a really good following with charter and freight operators. They can't seem to get enough of them - this could keep the line open for a good long time. Remember the A-300/A-310....

717-200 - agree, this orphan's days are numbered unless either Northwest buys a large batch or Boeing takes a bet and builds the 717-300. The new Embraer planes could be its undoing.

In short 737-about even with the competition.
767- loosing ground, weaker than it appears
757 - retreating to a niche market, but a large niche market (cargo, charter).
747- Getting squeezed out with time.
777- Doing great and getting better all the time.
717- Just not doing well. An orphan.
But I'm no pro. Anyone in the industry have anything to say?



User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7565 posts, RR: 28
Reply 24, posted (11 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1575 times:

Thank you HAL, you are right on the money with your comments. It is very short-sighted to look at the current market where most airlines are ordering NOTHING. Wait until everything shakes out hopefully before too long.

I'm curious to see what will happen in the next 5 years or so, assuming air travel demand picks back up and beyond where it was in the past in past years and grows beyond that. What will happen when the masses start flying again. Face it, sometime air travel will pick up back to where it was, considering the world population is growing and becoming increasingly more global. What is going to happen??? The majority of deliveries these days are RJ's, are we going to have an over abundance of RJ's in a few years and not enough mainline aircraft to cover routes. How are the glut of RJ's going to be handled at capacity constrained airport. Something is going to have to give someday and airlines will need airplanes larger than an ERJ or CRJ.


25 Heavymetal : Admittedly, neither the 739 or the A321 has the 757's range but then again few 757s travel over their maximum range as narrowbodies are unpopular on l
26 Cba : Not only does the 757 have more range capabilities than the 739 & A321, but its performance is also better. Could a fully loaded 739 or A321 make it o
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane? posted Sat Dec 2 2006 14:01:43 by AbleToFly
Is The 757 Being Reborn Or Just Being Used Better? posted Thu Jun 1 2006 16:22:48 by BHXDTW
Is The 757 Really Convenient? posted Mon Aug 22 2005 17:07:07 by EWRlovr
Is The 757-200 Heavy Or Not? posted Tue Apr 22 2003 21:00:57 by *HighFlyah*
Is The 757 Cabin The Same Width As The 737? posted Wed Jul 31 2002 07:15:38 by ChautauquaFA
Is The 757 Split Into More Than 1 Section? posted Sun Mar 4 2001 14:02:08 by LGW
Is The 737-900ER Extra Door Same As A 757 Door 3? posted Mon Aug 14 2006 18:35:04 by Speedmarque
What Is The Longest Scheduled 757 Flight? posted Tue Jul 5 2005 12:01:17 by Cslusarc
What Is The Longest Commercial 757 Service? posted Mon Mar 14 2005 17:49:28 by Samair
Is CO Operating The 757 From HKG? posted Thu Oct 14 2004 16:54:02 by SN-MD11